Cargando…
Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine
The rock mass is one of the key parameters in engineering design. Accurate rock mass classification is also essential to ensure operational safety. Over the past decades, various models have been proposed to evaluate and predict rock mass. Among these models, artificial intelligence (AI) based model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05027-y |
_version_ | 1784634565584748544 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Jianhua Zhou, Tan Ma, Shaowei Yang, Dongjie Guo, Mengmeng Huang, Pengli |
author_facet | Hu, Jianhua Zhou, Tan Ma, Shaowei Yang, Dongjie Guo, Mengmeng Huang, Pengli |
author_sort | Hu, Jianhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rock mass is one of the key parameters in engineering design. Accurate rock mass classification is also essential to ensure operational safety. Over the past decades, various models have been proposed to evaluate and predict rock mass. Among these models, artificial intelligence (AI) based models are becoming more popular due to their outstanding prediction results and generalization ability for multiinfluential factors. In order to develop an easy-to-use rock mass classification model, support vector machine (SVM) techniques are adopted as the basic prediction tools, and three types of optimization algorithms, i.e., particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and grey wolf optimization (GWO), are implemented to improve the prediction classification and optimize the hyper-parameters. A database was assembled, consisting of 80 sets of real engineering data, involving four influencing factors. The three combined models are compared in accuracy, precision, recall, F(1) value and computational time. The results reveal that among three models, the GWO-SVC-based model shows the best classification performance by training. The accuracy of training and testing sets of GWO-SVC are 90.6250% (58/64) and 93.7500% (15/16), respectively. For Grades I, II, III, IV and V, the precision value is 1, 0.93, 0.90, 0.92, 0.83, the recall value is 1, 1, 0.93, 0.73, 0.83, and the F(1) value is 1, 0.96, 0.92, 0.81, 0.83, respectively. Sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the influence of input parameters on rock mass classification. It shows that the sensitive factor in rock mass quality is the RQD. Finally, the GWO-SVC is employed to assess the quality of rocks from the southeastern ore body of the Chambishi copper mine. Overall, the current study demonstrates the potential of using artificial intelligence methods in rock mass assessment, rendering far better results than the previous reports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8766606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87666062022-01-20 Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine Hu, Jianhua Zhou, Tan Ma, Shaowei Yang, Dongjie Guo, Mengmeng Huang, Pengli Sci Rep Article The rock mass is one of the key parameters in engineering design. Accurate rock mass classification is also essential to ensure operational safety. Over the past decades, various models have been proposed to evaluate and predict rock mass. Among these models, artificial intelligence (AI) based models are becoming more popular due to their outstanding prediction results and generalization ability for multiinfluential factors. In order to develop an easy-to-use rock mass classification model, support vector machine (SVM) techniques are adopted as the basic prediction tools, and three types of optimization algorithms, i.e., particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and grey wolf optimization (GWO), are implemented to improve the prediction classification and optimize the hyper-parameters. A database was assembled, consisting of 80 sets of real engineering data, involving four influencing factors. The three combined models are compared in accuracy, precision, recall, F(1) value and computational time. The results reveal that among three models, the GWO-SVC-based model shows the best classification performance by training. The accuracy of training and testing sets of GWO-SVC are 90.6250% (58/64) and 93.7500% (15/16), respectively. For Grades I, II, III, IV and V, the precision value is 1, 0.93, 0.90, 0.92, 0.83, the recall value is 1, 1, 0.93, 0.73, 0.83, and the F(1) value is 1, 0.96, 0.92, 0.81, 0.83, respectively. Sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the influence of input parameters on rock mass classification. It shows that the sensitive factor in rock mass quality is the RQD. Finally, the GWO-SVC is employed to assess the quality of rocks from the southeastern ore body of the Chambishi copper mine. Overall, the current study demonstrates the potential of using artificial intelligence methods in rock mass assessment, rendering far better results than the previous reports. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8766606/ /pubmed/35043000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05027-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hu, Jianhua Zhou, Tan Ma, Shaowei Yang, Dongjie Guo, Mengmeng Huang, Pengli Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title | Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title_full | Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title_fullStr | Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title_full_unstemmed | Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title_short | Rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of Chambishi copper mine |
title_sort | rock mass classification prediction model using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines: a case study of chambishi copper mine |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05027-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujianhua rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine AT zhoutan rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine AT mashaowei rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine AT yangdongjie rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine AT guomengmeng rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine AT huangpengli rockmassclassificationpredictionmodelusingheuristicalgorithmsandsupportvectormachinesacasestudyofchambishicoppermine |