Cargando…

Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background: T4a gastric cancer (GC) is a subtype of advanced GC (AGC), which urgently needs a comprehensive grade method for better treatment strategy choosing. The purpose of this study was to develop two nomograms for predicting the prognosis of patients with T4a GC. Methods: A total of 1,129 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Zhiya, Zuo, Ziyi, Miao, Han, Ning, Zhijie, Deng, Youyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.767904
_version_ 1784634592612843520
author Hu, Zhiya
Zuo, Ziyi
Miao, Han
Ning, Zhijie
Deng, Youyuan
author_facet Hu, Zhiya
Zuo, Ziyi
Miao, Han
Ning, Zhijie
Deng, Youyuan
author_sort Hu, Zhiya
collection PubMed
description Background: T4a gastric cancer (GC) is a subtype of advanced GC (AGC), which urgently needs a comprehensive grade method for better treatment strategy choosing. The purpose of this study was to develop two nomograms for predicting the prognosis of patients with T4a GC. Methods: A total of 1,129 patients diagnosed as T4a GC between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) program database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for overall survival (OS) of the patients, whereas competing risk analyses were performed to find the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the patients. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to evaluate the nomograms. Results: Older age, larger tumor size, black race, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), more lymph node involvement, the absence of surgery, the absence of radiotherapy, and the absence of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. In the training cohort, the AUCs of the OS nomogram were 0.760, 0.743, and 0.723 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, whereas the AUCs of the CSS nomogram were 0.724, 0.703, and 0.713 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated that both nomograms can effectively predict OS and CSS, respectively. The abovementioned results were also confirmed in the validation cohort. Stratification of the patients into high- and low-risk groups highlighted the differences in prognosis between the two groups both in training and in validation cohorts. Conclusions: Age, tumor size, race, histologic type, N stage, surgery status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS in patients with T4a GC. Two nomograms based on the abovementioned variables were constructed to provide more accurate individual survival predictions for them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8766749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87667492022-01-20 Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study Hu, Zhiya Zuo, Ziyi Miao, Han Ning, Zhijie Deng, Youyuan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: T4a gastric cancer (GC) is a subtype of advanced GC (AGC), which urgently needs a comprehensive grade method for better treatment strategy choosing. The purpose of this study was to develop two nomograms for predicting the prognosis of patients with T4a GC. Methods: A total of 1,129 patients diagnosed as T4a GC between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) program database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for overall survival (OS) of the patients, whereas competing risk analyses were performed to find the independent predictors and to establish nomogram for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the patients. The area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to evaluate the nomograms. Results: Older age, larger tumor size, black race, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), more lymph node involvement, the absence of surgery, the absence of radiotherapy, and the absence of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. In the training cohort, the AUCs of the OS nomogram were 0.760, 0.743, and 0.723 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, whereas the AUCs of the CSS nomogram were 0.724, 0.703, and 0.713 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated that both nomograms can effectively predict OS and CSS, respectively. The abovementioned results were also confirmed in the validation cohort. Stratification of the patients into high- and low-risk groups highlighted the differences in prognosis between the two groups both in training and in validation cohorts. Conclusions: Age, tumor size, race, histologic type, N stage, surgery status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS in patients with T4a GC. Two nomograms based on the abovementioned variables were constructed to provide more accurate individual survival predictions for them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8766749/ /pubmed/35071261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.767904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Zuo, Miao, Ning and Deng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Hu, Zhiya
Zuo, Ziyi
Miao, Han
Ning, Zhijie
Deng, Youyuan
Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_full Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_short Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognosis of T4a Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study
title_sort incidence, risk factors and prognosis of t4a gastric cancer: a population-based study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.767904
work_keys_str_mv AT huzhiya incidenceriskfactorsandprognosisoft4agastriccancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT zuoziyi incidenceriskfactorsandprognosisoft4agastriccancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT miaohan incidenceriskfactorsandprognosisoft4agastriccancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT ningzhijie incidenceriskfactorsandprognosisoft4agastriccancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT dengyouyuan incidenceriskfactorsandprognosisoft4agastriccancerapopulationbasedstudy