Cargando…

Distress management in cancer patients: Guideline adaption based on CAN-IMPLEMENT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to adapt relevant clinical practice guidelines for distress management in cancer patients based on A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT), and develop Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines in the context of the research site. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Liang, Yang, Yang, Hu, Yan, Lu, Zhenqi, Zhang, Xiaoju, Huang, Mingzhu, Li, Yuanyuan, Zhu, Fuzhong, Wang, Yang, Huang, Zhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Nursing Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8766781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.12.005
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to adapt relevant clinical practice guidelines for distress management in cancer patients based on A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT), and develop Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines in the context of the research site. METHODS: According to CAN-IMPLEMENT, the symptoms of cancer patients in Shanghai were investigated, and a work plan was formulated to adapt cancer-related distress management guidelines. The relevant clinical practice guidelines for distress management in cancer patients were searched, screened and assessed, the contents of the included clinical practice guidelines were screened, extracted and integrated, and the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was developed. After peer review, the Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines was finally formed. RESULTS: The physical symptom distress score was higher than the psychological symptom distress score among cancer patients in Shanghai. Two clinical practice guidelines related to distress management in cancer patients were included after searching, screening, assessment and selection systematically. The domain scores of the draft Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines on Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) were 73.75%–87.50%, respectively. The scores of most recommendations on feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness were at least 90%. The final guidelines included 13 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the draft Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines based on two included guidelines was well-accepted. The final Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines needs to be further verified in clinical practice for feasibility, suitability and effectiveness.