Cargando…
Preponderance of right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients with inflammatory heart disease
INTRODUCTION: Recently published data suggests that inflammatory heart disease (IHD) is far more prevalent in COVID-19 patients than initially expected. Specifically, there have been reports of greater than expected right ventricular (RV) involvement in the post COVID-19 recovery period. However, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8767584/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0139 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Recently published data suggests that inflammatory heart disease (IHD) is far more prevalent in COVID-19 patients than initially expected. Specifically, there have been reports of greater than expected right ventricular (RV) involvement in the post COVID-19 recovery period. However, there are no published data comparing RV dysfunction in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patient cohorts with IHD. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess and compare the prevalence of RV hypokinesis in 2 patient cohorts: patients with COVID-19 related IHD and patients with non-COVID-19 related IHD, based on cardiac MRI findings (CMR). METHODS: An institutional cardiac imaging database was queried for all patients with IHD documented by CMR. Inflammatory heart disease was defined as pericarditis and/or myocarditis using the recently modified Lake Louise criteria, including T1 and T2 relaxation mapping. The prevalence of IHD was evaluated in 2 separate patient cohorts, subjects with COVID-19 related IHD and subjects with non-COVID-19 related IHD. Further assessment of these 2 patients cohorts included the presence of RV hypokinesis. A two-tailed Z-test was used for statistical comparison of the presence of IHD and the presence of RV hypokinesis in these 2 patient cohorts. RESULTS: 62 COVID patients and 6782 non-COVID patients were identified in the imaging database. 53 of the 62 COVID patients (85.5%) had evidence of IHD on CMR study. In contrast, 1273 of the 6782 patients (18.8%) had documented IHD detected by CMR. There was a statistically significant difference between the incidence of IHD in the 2 patient groups (p-value <0.ehab724.01391). Furthermore, of the 53 COVID patients with IHD, 30 (56.6%) showed evidence of RV hypokinesis on CMR. Of the 1273 non-COVID patients with IHD, only 126 (9.9%) showed evidence of RV hypokinesis on CMR. There was a statistically significant difference between the incidence of RV hypokinesis among the 2 groups (p-value <0.ehab724.01391). Details are provided in Figure 1. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the prevalence of IHD in COVID-19 patients is 4 times greater than in patients with a non-COVID etiology, based on CMR imaging findings. Furthermore, the occurrence of RV hypokinesis is 5 times greater in COVID-19 patients than in IHD patients with a non-COVID etiology, also based on CMR findings. These data suggest that CMR imaging is of value in detecting both IHD and RV dysfunction, which are often difficult to detect with other imaging modalities. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. |
---|