Closure of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Austria in spring 2020 resulted in deteriorating physical exercise capacity: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Group-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has inevitably been disrupted by COVID-19-related public health measures, increasing the risk of deterioration in modifiable risk factors for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). PURPOSE: To examine the impact of CR closure during the first COVID-19-related national lockdown in Austria in spring 2020 on patients' maintenance of physical activity, physical fitness levels, and cardiovascular risk profile; and to describe the patient experience of lack of group-based CR training due to COVID-19. METHODS: This mixed-methods study recruited patients from an outpatient CR centre in Austria during summer 2020. Eligibility criteria were regular attendance at weekly group-based exercise training at the centre until the COVID-19-related lockdown in March 2020; pre-lockdown completion of a maximal cycle ergometer test; no contraindications for maximal exercise testing; and no new complaints limiting exercise performance. Participants underwent post-lockdown quantitative assessment of physical fitness (maximal cycle ergometer testing, submaximal cycle ergometer training session at individual pre-lockdown settings) and cardiovascular risk status. These were compared with pre-lockdown data from medical records. Participants gave qualitative interviews about their experience of maintaining exercise during lockdown. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and interpreted using framework analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (57%) of 49 eligible patients were recruited, 1 withdrew, and 27 completed all study procedures. Two participants were excluded from analysis of physical fitness data, due to subsequent diagnosis of new complaints limiting exercise performance. Mean (SD) age was 69 (7.4) years. Six (22%) were female. Median (IQR) time since first CVD event was 8 (5.5, 9) years. In maximal ergometer testing, 14 (56%) had deteriorated, 10 (40%) were unchanged, and 1 (4%) had improved post-lockdown. At group level, power was significantly reduced (maximal ergometer testing, submaximal ergometer training), whereas CVD risk factors remained unchanged from pre- to post-lockdown (table 1). Qualitative analysis corroborated the negative impact of the closure of CR classes (table 2). CONCLUSIONS: This patient cohort was heterogeneous with respect to physical activity levels and exercise capacity, yet overall motivated and experienced in exercise training, having regularly attended training sessions at the centre before the lockdown. Despite individually seeking out alternative exercise options during lockdown, group average exercise capacity deteriorated even in this motivated and exercise-conscious group. This highlights the importance of providing group-based opportunities for supervised high intensity training for patients who engage well in such a setting, and the detrimental impact of disruption to this type of CR service. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft COVID-19 Support Measure: Open Innovation in Science (OIS) Research Enrichment Fund