Cargando…
Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients
PURPOSES: To evaluate inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair (MFR) and to identify relevant aggregating factors. METHODS: Using a prospective non-randomised comparative study design, we enrolled a cohort of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients undergoing MFR. The pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Masson SAS.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8767911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.006 |
_version_ | 1784634813800513536 |
---|---|
author | Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate Sirintawat, Nattapong Tangmanee, Chatpong Sukphopetch, Passanesh Meningaud, Jean-Paul Neff, Andreas |
author_facet | Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate Sirintawat, Nattapong Tangmanee, Chatpong Sukphopetch, Passanesh Meningaud, Jean-Paul Neff, Andreas |
author_sort | Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSES: To evaluate inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair (MFR) and to identify relevant aggregating factors. METHODS: Using a prospective non-randomised comparative study design, we enrolled a cohort of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients undergoing MFR. The predictor variables were osteofixation system (conventional titanium plates [CTiP] vs. ultrasound-assisted resorbable plates [USaRP]). The main outcomes were the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on four different surfaces. Other study variables were categorised into demographic, anatomical, and operative. Descriptive, bi- and multivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 11 patients (27.3% females, 63.6% right side, 72.7% displaced fractures) with a mean age of 52.7 ± 20.1 years (range, 19–85). Viral spread was, on average, 1.9 ± 0.4 m. from the operative field, including most oral and orbital retractors’ tips (81.8% and 72.7%) and no virus was found at 3 m from the operative field, but no significant difference was found between 2 osteofixation types. On binary adjustments, significantly broader contamination was linked to centrolateral MFR (P = 0.034; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 1.02), and displaced MFR > 45 min (P = 0.022; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: USaRP, albeit presumably heavily aerosol-producing, cause similar SARS-CoV-2 distribution to CTiP. Non-surgical operating room (OR) staff should stay ≥ 3 m from the operative field, if the patient is SARS-CoV-2-positive. Enoral and orbital instruments are a potential virus source, especially during displaced MFR > 45 min and/or centrolateral MFR, emphasising an importance of appropriate patient screening and OR organisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8767911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87679112022-01-19 Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate Sirintawat, Nattapong Tangmanee, Chatpong Sukphopetch, Passanesh Meningaud, Jean-Paul Neff, Andreas J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article PURPOSES: To evaluate inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair (MFR) and to identify relevant aggregating factors. METHODS: Using a prospective non-randomised comparative study design, we enrolled a cohort of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients undergoing MFR. The predictor variables were osteofixation system (conventional titanium plates [CTiP] vs. ultrasound-assisted resorbable plates [USaRP]). The main outcomes were the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on four different surfaces. Other study variables were categorised into demographic, anatomical, and operative. Descriptive, bi- and multivariate statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 11 patients (27.3% females, 63.6% right side, 72.7% displaced fractures) with a mean age of 52.7 ± 20.1 years (range, 19–85). Viral spread was, on average, 1.9 ± 0.4 m. from the operative field, including most oral and orbital retractors’ tips (81.8% and 72.7%) and no virus was found at 3 m from the operative field, but no significant difference was found between 2 osteofixation types. On binary adjustments, significantly broader contamination was linked to centrolateral MFR (P = 0.034; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 1.02), and displaced MFR > 45 min (P = 0.022; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: USaRP, albeit presumably heavily aerosol-producing, cause similar SARS-CoV-2 distribution to CTiP. Non-surgical operating room (OR) staff should stay ≥ 3 m from the operative field, if the patient is SARS-CoV-2-positive. Enoral and orbital instruments are a potential virus source, especially during displaced MFR > 45 min and/or centrolateral MFR, emphasising an importance of appropriate patient screening and OR organisation. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2022-10 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8767911/ /pubmed/35063683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.006 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate Sirintawat, Nattapong Tangmanee, Chatpong Sukphopetch, Passanesh Meningaud, Jean-Paul Neff, Andreas Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title | Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title_full | Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title_short | Inanimate surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | inanimate surface contamination of sars-cov-2 during midfacial fracture repair in asymptomatic covid-19 patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8767911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pitakarnnopporamate inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients AT sirintawatnattapong inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients AT tangmaneechatpong inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients AT sukphopetchpassanesh inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients AT meningaudjeanpaul inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients AT neffandreas inanimatesurfacecontaminationofsarscov2duringmidfacialfracturerepairinasymptomaticcovid19patients |