Cargando…

Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used CT and MR images of te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Posiewnik, Michał, Piotrowski, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079232
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.112518
_version_ 1784634836753842176
author Posiewnik, Michał
Piotrowski, Tomasz
author_facet Posiewnik, Michał
Piotrowski, Tomasz
author_sort Posiewnik, Michał
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume – CTV) on CT (CTV(CT)) and MR (CTV(MR)) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method. RESULTS: The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTV(CT) volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (p = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients’ bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8768054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87680542022-01-24 Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy Posiewnik, Michał Piotrowski, Tomasz Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume – CTV) on CT (CTV(CT)) and MR (CTV(MR)) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method. RESULTS: The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTV(CT) volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (p = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients’ bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution. Termedia Publishing House 2022-01-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8768054/ /pubmed/35079232 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.112518 Text en Copyright © 2021 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Posiewnik, Michał
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_short Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
title_sort validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of mr-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079232
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.112518
work_keys_str_mv AT posiewnikmichał validationofthedosimetricandgeometricaccuracyofmronlytreatmentplanningsolutionforprostatecancerradiotherapy
AT piotrowskitomasz validationofthedosimetricandgeometricaccuracyofmronlytreatmentplanningsolutionforprostatecancerradiotherapy