Cargando…
External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705 |
_version_ | 1784635020824018944 |
---|---|
author | Islim, Abdurrahman I Millward, Christopher P Piper, Rory J Fountain, Daniel M Mehta, Shaveta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Ali, Usama Koszdin, Shelli Diane Georgious, Theo Mills, Samantha J Brodbelt, Andrew R Mathew, Ryan K Santarius, Thomas Jenkinson, Michael D |
author_facet | Islim, Abdurrahman I Millward, Christopher P Piper, Rory J Fountain, Daniel M Mehta, Shaveta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Ali, Usama Koszdin, Shelli Diane Georgious, Theo Mills, Samantha J Brodbelt, Andrew R Mathew, Ryan K Santarius, Thomas Jenkinson, Michael D |
author_sort | Islim, Abdurrahman I |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma varies widely with active clinical-radiological monitoring being the most accepted method by clinicians. Duration of monitoring and time intervals for assessment, however, are not well defined. To this end, we have recently developed a statistical model of progression risk based on single-centre retrospective data. The model Incidental Meningioma: Prognostic Analysis Using Patient Comorbidity and MRI Tests (IMPACT) employs baseline clinical and imaging features to categorise the patient with an incidental meningioma into one of three risk groups: low, medium and high risk with a proposed active monitoring strategy based on the risk and temporal trajectory of progression, accounting for actuarial life expectancy. The primary aim of this study is to assess the external validity of this model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: IMPACT is a retrospective multicentre study which will aim to include 1500 patients with an incidental intracranial meningioma, powered to detect a 10% progression risk. Adult patients ≥16 years diagnosed with an incidental meningioma between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 will be included. Clinical and radiological data will be collected longitudinally until the patient reaches one of the study endpoints: intervention (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy), mortality or last date of follow-up. Data will be uploaded to an online Research Electronic Data Capture database with no unique identifiers. External validity of IMPACT will be tested using established statistical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local institutional approval at each participating centre will be required. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed articles and conferences and disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public using social media. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8768908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87689082022-02-04 External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study Islim, Abdurrahman I Millward, Christopher P Piper, Rory J Fountain, Daniel M Mehta, Shaveta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Ali, Usama Koszdin, Shelli Diane Georgious, Theo Mills, Samantha J Brodbelt, Andrew R Mathew, Ryan K Santarius, Thomas Jenkinson, Michael D BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma varies widely with active clinical-radiological monitoring being the most accepted method by clinicians. Duration of monitoring and time intervals for assessment, however, are not well defined. To this end, we have recently developed a statistical model of progression risk based on single-centre retrospective data. The model Incidental Meningioma: Prognostic Analysis Using Patient Comorbidity and MRI Tests (IMPACT) employs baseline clinical and imaging features to categorise the patient with an incidental meningioma into one of three risk groups: low, medium and high risk with a proposed active monitoring strategy based on the risk and temporal trajectory of progression, accounting for actuarial life expectancy. The primary aim of this study is to assess the external validity of this model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: IMPACT is a retrospective multicentre study which will aim to include 1500 patients with an incidental intracranial meningioma, powered to detect a 10% progression risk. Adult patients ≥16 years diagnosed with an incidental meningioma between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 will be included. Clinical and radiological data will be collected longitudinally until the patient reaches one of the study endpoints: intervention (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy), mortality or last date of follow-up. Data will be uploaded to an online Research Electronic Data Capture database with no unique identifiers. External validity of IMPACT will be tested using established statistical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local institutional approval at each participating centre will be required. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed articles and conferences and disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public using social media. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8768908/ /pubmed/35042706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Islim, Abdurrahman I Millward, Christopher P Piper, Rory J Fountain, Daniel M Mehta, Shaveta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Ali, Usama Koszdin, Shelli Diane Georgious, Theo Mills, Samantha J Brodbelt, Andrew R Mathew, Ryan K Santarius, Thomas Jenkinson, Michael D External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title | External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full | External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_short | External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | external validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – impact: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islimabdurrahmani externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT millwardchristopherp externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT piperroryj externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT fountaindanielm externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mehtashaveta externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kolamunnagedonaruwanthi externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT aliusama externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT koszdinshellidiane externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT georgioustheo externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT millssamanthaj externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT brodbeltandrewr externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mathewryank externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT santariusthomas externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT jenkinsonmichaeld externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy |