Cargando…

External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islim, Abdurrahman I, Millward, Christopher P, Piper, Rory J, Fountain, Daniel M, Mehta, Shaveta, Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi, Ali, Usama, Koszdin, Shelli Diane, Georgious, Theo, Mills, Samantha J, Brodbelt, Andrew R, Mathew, Ryan K, Santarius, Thomas, Jenkinson, Michael D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705
_version_ 1784635020824018944
author Islim, Abdurrahman I
Millward, Christopher P
Piper, Rory J
Fountain, Daniel M
Mehta, Shaveta
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Ali, Usama
Koszdin, Shelli Diane
Georgious, Theo
Mills, Samantha J
Brodbelt, Andrew R
Mathew, Ryan K
Santarius, Thomas
Jenkinson, Michael D
author_facet Islim, Abdurrahman I
Millward, Christopher P
Piper, Rory J
Fountain, Daniel M
Mehta, Shaveta
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Ali, Usama
Koszdin, Shelli Diane
Georgious, Theo
Mills, Samantha J
Brodbelt, Andrew R
Mathew, Ryan K
Santarius, Thomas
Jenkinson, Michael D
author_sort Islim, Abdurrahman I
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma varies widely with active clinical-radiological monitoring being the most accepted method by clinicians. Duration of monitoring and time intervals for assessment, however, are not well defined. To this end, we have recently developed a statistical model of progression risk based on single-centre retrospective data. The model Incidental Meningioma: Prognostic Analysis Using Patient Comorbidity and MRI Tests (IMPACT) employs baseline clinical and imaging features to categorise the patient with an incidental meningioma into one of three risk groups: low, medium and high risk with a proposed active monitoring strategy based on the risk and temporal trajectory of progression, accounting for actuarial life expectancy. The primary aim of this study is to assess the external validity of this model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: IMPACT is a retrospective multicentre study which will aim to include 1500 patients with an incidental intracranial meningioma, powered to detect a 10% progression risk. Adult patients ≥16 years diagnosed with an incidental meningioma between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 will be included. Clinical and radiological data will be collected longitudinally until the patient reaches one of the study endpoints: intervention (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy), mortality or last date of follow-up. Data will be uploaded to an online Research Electronic Data Capture database with no unique identifiers. External validity of IMPACT will be tested using established statistical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local institutional approval at each participating centre will be required. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed articles and conferences and disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public using social media.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8768908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87689082022-02-04 External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study Islim, Abdurrahman I Millward, Christopher P Piper, Rory J Fountain, Daniel M Mehta, Shaveta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Ali, Usama Koszdin, Shelli Diane Georgious, Theo Mills, Samantha J Brodbelt, Andrew R Mathew, Ryan K Santarius, Thomas Jenkinson, Michael D BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased use of CT and MRI, the prevalence of incidental findings on brain scans is increasing. Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumour, is a frequently encountered incidental finding, with an estimated prevalence of 3/1000. The management of incidental meningioma varies widely with active clinical-radiological monitoring being the most accepted method by clinicians. Duration of monitoring and time intervals for assessment, however, are not well defined. To this end, we have recently developed a statistical model of progression risk based on single-centre retrospective data. The model Incidental Meningioma: Prognostic Analysis Using Patient Comorbidity and MRI Tests (IMPACT) employs baseline clinical and imaging features to categorise the patient with an incidental meningioma into one of three risk groups: low, medium and high risk with a proposed active monitoring strategy based on the risk and temporal trajectory of progression, accounting for actuarial life expectancy. The primary aim of this study is to assess the external validity of this model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: IMPACT is a retrospective multicentre study which will aim to include 1500 patients with an incidental intracranial meningioma, powered to detect a 10% progression risk. Adult patients ≥16 years diagnosed with an incidental meningioma between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 will be included. Clinical and radiological data will be collected longitudinally until the patient reaches one of the study endpoints: intervention (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy), mortality or last date of follow-up. Data will be uploaded to an online Research Electronic Data Capture database with no unique identifiers. External validity of IMPACT will be tested using established statistical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Local institutional approval at each participating centre will be required. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed articles and conferences and disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public using social media. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8768908/ /pubmed/35042706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurology
Islim, Abdurrahman I
Millward, Christopher P
Piper, Rory J
Fountain, Daniel M
Mehta, Shaveta
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Ali, Usama
Koszdin, Shelli Diane
Georgious, Theo
Mills, Samantha J
Brodbelt, Andrew R
Mathew, Ryan K
Santarius, Thomas
Jenkinson, Michael D
External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title_full External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title_short External validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – IMPACT: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
title_sort external validation and recalibration of an incidental meningioma prognostic model – impact: protocol for an international multicentre retrospective cohort study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052705
work_keys_str_mv AT islimabdurrahmani externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT millwardchristopherp externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT piperroryj externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fountaindanielm externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mehtashaveta externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kolamunnagedonaruwanthi externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT aliusama externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT koszdinshellidiane externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT georgioustheo externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT millssamanthaj externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT brodbeltandrewr externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mathewryank externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT santariusthomas externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jenkinsonmichaeld externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT externalvalidationandrecalibrationofanincidentalmeningiomaprognosticmodelimpactprotocolforaninternationalmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy