Cargando…

Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot

INTRODUCTION: Implementation researchers could draw from participatory research to engage patients (consumers of healthcare) in implementation processes and possibly reduce healthcare disparities. There is a little consumer involvement in healthcare implementation, partially because no formal guidan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodward, Eva N, Willging, Cathleen, Landes, Sara J, Hausmann, Leslie R M, Drummond, Karen L, Ounpraseuth, Songthip, Ball, Irenia A, Kirchner, JoAnn E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050107
_version_ 1784635023281881088
author Woodward, Eva N
Willging, Cathleen
Landes, Sara J
Hausmann, Leslie R M
Drummond, Karen L
Ounpraseuth, Songthip
Ball, Irenia A
Kirchner, JoAnn E
author_facet Woodward, Eva N
Willging, Cathleen
Landes, Sara J
Hausmann, Leslie R M
Drummond, Karen L
Ounpraseuth, Songthip
Ball, Irenia A
Kirchner, JoAnn E
author_sort Woodward, Eva N
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Implementation researchers could draw from participatory research to engage patients (consumers of healthcare) in implementation processes and possibly reduce healthcare disparities. There is a little consumer involvement in healthcare implementation, partially because no formal guidance exists. We will create and pilot a toolkit of methods to engage consumers from the US’ Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in selecting and tailoring implementation strategies. This toolkit, Consumer Voice, will provide guidance on what, when, where, how and why an implementer might engage consumers in implementing treatments. We will pilot the toolkit by implementing Safety Planning Intervention for suicide prevention with rural veterans, a population with suicide disparities. Safety Planning Intervention is effective for reducing suicidal behaviours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In Aim 1, we will use participatory approaches and user-centred design to develop Consumer Voice and its methods. In Aim 2, we will pilot Consumer Voice by implementing the Safety Planning Intervention in two clinics serving rural VHA patients. One site will receive a current implementation strategy (Implementation Facilitation) only; the second will receive Implementation Facilitation plus Consumer Voice. We will use mixed methods to assess feasibility and acceptability of Consumer Voice. We will compare sites on preliminary implementation (reach, adoption, fidelity) and clinical outcomes (depression severity, suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour). In Aim 3, we will evaluate Aim 2 outcomes at 20 months to assess sustained impact. We will gather qualitative data on sustainability of the Safety Planning Intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: These studies are overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. We plan to use traditional academic modalities of dissemination (eg, conferences, publications). We plan to disseminate findings through meetings with other trainers in implementation practice so they may adopt Consumer Voice. We plan to share results with local community boards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8768923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87689232022-02-04 Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot Woodward, Eva N Willging, Cathleen Landes, Sara J Hausmann, Leslie R M Drummond, Karen L Ounpraseuth, Songthip Ball, Irenia A Kirchner, JoAnn E BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Implementation researchers could draw from participatory research to engage patients (consumers of healthcare) in implementation processes and possibly reduce healthcare disparities. There is a little consumer involvement in healthcare implementation, partially because no formal guidance exists. We will create and pilot a toolkit of methods to engage consumers from the US’ Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in selecting and tailoring implementation strategies. This toolkit, Consumer Voice, will provide guidance on what, when, where, how and why an implementer might engage consumers in implementing treatments. We will pilot the toolkit by implementing Safety Planning Intervention for suicide prevention with rural veterans, a population with suicide disparities. Safety Planning Intervention is effective for reducing suicidal behaviours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In Aim 1, we will use participatory approaches and user-centred design to develop Consumer Voice and its methods. In Aim 2, we will pilot Consumer Voice by implementing the Safety Planning Intervention in two clinics serving rural VHA patients. One site will receive a current implementation strategy (Implementation Facilitation) only; the second will receive Implementation Facilitation plus Consumer Voice. We will use mixed methods to assess feasibility and acceptability of Consumer Voice. We will compare sites on preliminary implementation (reach, adoption, fidelity) and clinical outcomes (depression severity, suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour). In Aim 3, we will evaluate Aim 2 outcomes at 20 months to assess sustained impact. We will gather qualitative data on sustainability of the Safety Planning Intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: These studies are overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. We plan to use traditional academic modalities of dissemination (eg, conferences, publications). We plan to disseminate findings through meetings with other trainers in implementation practice so they may adopt Consumer Voice. We plan to share results with local community boards. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8768923/ /pubmed/35042705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050107 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Woodward, Eva N
Willging, Cathleen
Landes, Sara J
Hausmann, Leslie R M
Drummond, Karen L
Ounpraseuth, Songthip
Ball, Irenia A
Kirchner, JoAnn E
Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title_full Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title_fullStr Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title_full_unstemmed Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title_short Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot
title_sort determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type ii pilot
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35042705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050107
work_keys_str_mv AT woodwardevan determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT willgingcathleen determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT landessaraj determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT hausmannleslierm determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT drummondkarenl determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT ounpraseuthsongthip determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT ballireniaa determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot
AT kirchnerjoanne determiningfeasibilityofincorporatingconsumerengagementintoimplementationactivitiesstudyprotocolofahybrideffectivenessimplementationtypeiipilot