Cargando…

Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search

In invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), it is critical that the flow value is estimated correctly, as it is used as a trigger variable for ventilatory assistance. Furthermore, the numerical integration of the flow allows the calculation of the total volume per breath (tidal volume), which clinicia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3116307
_version_ 1784635040315998208
collection PubMed
description In invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), it is critical that the flow value is estimated correctly, as it is used as a trigger variable for ventilatory assistance. Furthermore, the numerical integration of the flow allows the calculation of the total volume per breath (tidal volume), which clinicians use to identify trauma or lung capacity in the patient. The current COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need to develop safe and efficient techniques for measuring this spirometry variable because many mechanical ventilators delivered to hospitals were unable to measure it directly. A good device to estimate flow is a D-lite sensor, which works by the Venturi effect, is cheap, reusable, and proximal to the patient. However, the regressions applied to the flow estimation model are limited for use in real conditions. This article presents a flow estimation method that uses a D-Lite device, a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) cell, and two pressure sensors as critical items. Our novel method adapts the dichotomous search algorithm instead of conventional regression algorithms to estimate flow using a D-lite sensor; this change in the standard procedure allowed us a fast calibration process, a good low-flow estimation, and low computational time for flow estimation. The method was validated experimentally to compute the tidal volume according to the measurement requirement error range of +/−10%. The consideration of FiO(2) percentage in the gas mixture and the good low-flow estimation make this novel method useful for real ventilation conditions. The flow calculations have been performed at different ambient conditions and compared with gas analyzers show an average relative error of up to 4.86%. Finally, we present an analysis of the error flow estimation considering the variation in each variable. Technical recommendations for applying this novel method to achieve IMV safely are presented, based on the capabilities of the embedded system used by developers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87690362022-03-03 Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search IEEE Trans Instrum Meas Article In invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), it is critical that the flow value is estimated correctly, as it is used as a trigger variable for ventilatory assistance. Furthermore, the numerical integration of the flow allows the calculation of the total volume per breath (tidal volume), which clinicians use to identify trauma or lung capacity in the patient. The current COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need to develop safe and efficient techniques for measuring this spirometry variable because many mechanical ventilators delivered to hospitals were unable to measure it directly. A good device to estimate flow is a D-lite sensor, which works by the Venturi effect, is cheap, reusable, and proximal to the patient. However, the regressions applied to the flow estimation model are limited for use in real conditions. This article presents a flow estimation method that uses a D-Lite device, a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) cell, and two pressure sensors as critical items. Our novel method adapts the dichotomous search algorithm instead of conventional regression algorithms to estimate flow using a D-lite sensor; this change in the standard procedure allowed us a fast calibration process, a good low-flow estimation, and low computational time for flow estimation. The method was validated experimentally to compute the tidal volume according to the measurement requirement error range of +/−10%. The consideration of FiO(2) percentage in the gas mixture and the good low-flow estimation make this novel method useful for real ventilation conditions. The flow calculations have been performed at different ambient conditions and compared with gas analyzers show an average relative error of up to 4.86%. Finally, we present an analysis of the error flow estimation considering the variation in each variable. Technical recommendations for applying this novel method to achieve IMV safely are presented, based on the capabilities of the embedded system used by developers. IEEE 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8769036/ /pubmed/35256870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3116307 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title_full Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title_fullStr Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title_full_unstemmed Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title_short Differential Pressure Spirometry for Mechanical Ventilation Using Dichotomic Search
title_sort differential pressure spirometry for mechanical ventilation using dichotomic search
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3116307
work_keys_str_mv AT differentialpressurespirometryformechanicalventilationusingdichotomicsearch
AT differentialpressurespirometryformechanicalventilationusingdichotomicsearch
AT differentialpressurespirometryformechanicalventilationusingdichotomicsearch