Cargando…
The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery ski...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068943 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933 |
_version_ | 1784635042812657664 |
---|---|
author | Misganaw, Equlinet Yigzaw, Tegbar Tezera, Robel Gelitew, Awoke Gedamu, Shewatatek |
author_facet | Misganaw, Equlinet Yigzaw, Tegbar Tezera, Robel Gelitew, Awoke Gedamu, Shewatatek |
author_sort | Misganaw, Equlinet |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery skills. Despite the fact that some academic programs followed the conventional educational strategy, a significant number of academic programs adopted a new educational strategy for curriculum development: Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Elective, and Systematic (SPICES) model. More empirical evidence, however, is required to determine whether the new curricular approach is effective in improving students’ clinical reasoning. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new educational strategy for curriculum development improves the clinical reasoning ability of midwifery students when compared to a peer institution that follows a traditional curriculum. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical reasoning skills of midwifery students who completed the new curricular approach versus students who completed a traditional curriculum. A Script Concordance Test (SCT) was used to collect data. The mean SCT score and an independent two-sample t-test were calculated to see if the two groups differed significantly in terms of clinical reasoning skills in managing Post-Partum hemorrhage (PPH). RESULTS: A total of 77 final-year midwifery students participated (38 from the new and 39 from the traditional curriculum approach). Midwifery students who completed the new and conventional curriculum approaches had mean clinical reasoning SCT scores of 0.7 (SD = 0.35) and 0.53 (SD = 0.37), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall mean SCT score between the two study groups in terms of clinical reasoning skills (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our study found that the new SPICES model curricular approach is promising in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills of Midwifery students in managing PPH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8769052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87690522022-01-20 The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study Misganaw, Equlinet Yigzaw, Tegbar Tezera, Robel Gelitew, Awoke Gedamu, Shewatatek Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery skills. Despite the fact that some academic programs followed the conventional educational strategy, a significant number of academic programs adopted a new educational strategy for curriculum development: Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Elective, and Systematic (SPICES) model. More empirical evidence, however, is required to determine whether the new curricular approach is effective in improving students’ clinical reasoning. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new educational strategy for curriculum development improves the clinical reasoning ability of midwifery students when compared to a peer institution that follows a traditional curriculum. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical reasoning skills of midwifery students who completed the new curricular approach versus students who completed a traditional curriculum. A Script Concordance Test (SCT) was used to collect data. The mean SCT score and an independent two-sample t-test were calculated to see if the two groups differed significantly in terms of clinical reasoning skills in managing Post-Partum hemorrhage (PPH). RESULTS: A total of 77 final-year midwifery students participated (38 from the new and 39 from the traditional curriculum approach). Midwifery students who completed the new and conventional curriculum approaches had mean clinical reasoning SCT scores of 0.7 (SD = 0.35) and 0.53 (SD = 0.37), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall mean SCT score between the two study groups in terms of clinical reasoning skills (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our study found that the new SPICES model curricular approach is promising in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills of Midwifery students in managing PPH. Dove 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8769052/ /pubmed/35068943 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933 Text en © 2022 Misganaw et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Misganaw, Equlinet Yigzaw, Tegbar Tezera, Robel Gelitew, Awoke Gedamu, Shewatatek The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title | The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | promise of the new educational strategy for curriculum development (spices) model on the development of students’ clinical reasoning ability. a comparative cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068943 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT misganawequlinet thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT yigzawtegbar thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT tezerarobel thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT gelitewawoke thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT gedamushewatatek thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT misganawequlinet promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT yigzawtegbar promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT tezerarobel promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT gelitewawoke promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy AT gedamushewatatek promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy |