Cargando…

The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery ski...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misganaw, Equlinet, Yigzaw, Tegbar, Tezera, Robel, Gelitew, Awoke, Gedamu, Shewatatek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068943
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933
_version_ 1784635042812657664
author Misganaw, Equlinet
Yigzaw, Tegbar
Tezera, Robel
Gelitew, Awoke
Gedamu, Shewatatek
author_facet Misganaw, Equlinet
Yigzaw, Tegbar
Tezera, Robel
Gelitew, Awoke
Gedamu, Shewatatek
author_sort Misganaw, Equlinet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery skills. Despite the fact that some academic programs followed the conventional educational strategy, a significant number of academic programs adopted a new educational strategy for curriculum development: Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Elective, and Systematic (SPICES) model. More empirical evidence, however, is required to determine whether the new curricular approach is effective in improving students’ clinical reasoning. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new educational strategy for curriculum development improves the clinical reasoning ability of midwifery students when compared to a peer institution that follows a traditional curriculum. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical reasoning skills of midwifery students who completed the new curricular approach versus students who completed a traditional curriculum. A Script Concordance Test (SCT) was used to collect data. The mean SCT score and an independent two-sample t-test were calculated to see if the two groups differed significantly in terms of clinical reasoning skills in managing Post-Partum hemorrhage (PPH). RESULTS: A total of 77 final-year midwifery students participated (38 from the new and 39 from the traditional curriculum approach). Midwifery students who completed the new and conventional curriculum approaches had mean clinical reasoning SCT scores of 0.7 (SD = 0.35) and 0.53 (SD = 0.37), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall mean SCT score between the two study groups in terms of clinical reasoning skills (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our study found that the new SPICES model curricular approach is promising in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills of Midwifery students in managing PPH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87690522022-01-20 The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study Misganaw, Equlinet Yigzaw, Tegbar Tezera, Robel Gelitew, Awoke Gedamu, Shewatatek Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery skills. Despite the fact that some academic programs followed the conventional educational strategy, a significant number of academic programs adopted a new educational strategy for curriculum development: Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Elective, and Systematic (SPICES) model. More empirical evidence, however, is required to determine whether the new curricular approach is effective in improving students’ clinical reasoning. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new educational strategy for curriculum development improves the clinical reasoning ability of midwifery students when compared to a peer institution that follows a traditional curriculum. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical reasoning skills of midwifery students who completed the new curricular approach versus students who completed a traditional curriculum. A Script Concordance Test (SCT) was used to collect data. The mean SCT score and an independent two-sample t-test were calculated to see if the two groups differed significantly in terms of clinical reasoning skills in managing Post-Partum hemorrhage (PPH). RESULTS: A total of 77 final-year midwifery students participated (38 from the new and 39 from the traditional curriculum approach). Midwifery students who completed the new and conventional curriculum approaches had mean clinical reasoning SCT scores of 0.7 (SD = 0.35) and 0.53 (SD = 0.37), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall mean SCT score between the two study groups in terms of clinical reasoning skills (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our study found that the new SPICES model curricular approach is promising in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills of Midwifery students in managing PPH. Dove 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8769052/ /pubmed/35068943 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933 Text en © 2022 Misganaw et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Misganaw, Equlinet
Yigzaw, Tegbar
Tezera, Robel
Gelitew, Awoke
Gedamu, Shewatatek
The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_short The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students’ Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort promise of the new educational strategy for curriculum development (spices) model on the development of students’ clinical reasoning ability. a comparative cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35068943
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S344933
work_keys_str_mv AT misganawequlinet thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT yigzawtegbar thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT tezerarobel thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT gelitewawoke thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT gedamushewatatek thepromiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT misganawequlinet promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT yigzawtegbar promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT tezerarobel promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT gelitewawoke promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT gedamushewatatek promiseoftheneweducationalstrategyforcurriculumdevelopmentspicesmodelonthedevelopmentofstudentsclinicalreasoningabilityacomparativecrosssectionalstudy