Cargando…

Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rendon, Juan L., Borrell-Vega, Jaume, Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C., Wang, Diana M., Roeth, Cory, Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud, Skoracki, Roman J., Harter, Ronald L., Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D., Humeidan, Michelle L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004010
_version_ 1784635050134863872
author Rendon, Juan L.
Borrell-Vega, Jaume
Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C.
Wang, Diana M.
Roeth, Cory
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
Skoracki, Roman J.
Harter, Ronald L.
Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
Humeidan, Michelle L.
author_facet Rendon, Juan L.
Borrell-Vega, Jaume
Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C.
Wang, Diana M.
Roeth, Cory
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
Skoracki, Roman J.
Harter, Ronald L.
Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
Humeidan, Michelle L.
author_sort Rendon, Juan L.
collection PubMed
description At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], P < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4–266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8–267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2–582.7), P < 0.001). Neither length of stay (P = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption (P = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. CONCLUSION: Compared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87690832022-01-20 Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Rendon, Juan L. Borrell-Vega, Jaume Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C. Wang, Diana M. Roeth, Cory Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud Skoracki, Roman J. Harter, Ronald L. Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D. Humeidan, Michelle L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], P < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4–266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8–267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2–582.7), P < 0.001). Neither length of stay (P = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption (P = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. CONCLUSION: Compared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8769083/ /pubmed/35070591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004010 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Rendon, Juan L.
Borrell-Vega, Jaume
Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C.
Wang, Diana M.
Roeth, Cory
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
Skoracki, Roman J.
Harter, Ronald L.
Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
Humeidan, Michelle L.
Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_short Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_sort evaluating the efficacy of two regional pain management modalities in autologous breast reconstruction
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004010
work_keys_str_mv AT rendonjuanl evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT borrellvegajaume evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT reyesjoshuapaoloc evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT wangdianam evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT roethcory evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT abdelrasoulmahmoud evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT skorackiromanj evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT harterronaldl evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT moffattbrucesusand evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction
AT humeidanmichellel evaluatingtheefficacyoftworegionalpainmanagementmodalitiesinautologousbreastreconstruction