Cargando…

On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’

AIMS: 1. To standardise the doctor handovers for on-call duties 2. To ensure there is documented evidence of handover taking place at the end of each shift BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the European working time directive the amount of hours that doctors are allowed to work has been reduced,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campling, Hannah, Aubrey-Jones, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769223/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.483
_version_ 1784635083328585728
author Campling, Hannah
Aubrey-Jones, Dominic
author_facet Campling, Hannah
Aubrey-Jones, Dominic
author_sort Campling, Hannah
collection PubMed
description AIMS: 1. To standardise the doctor handovers for on-call duties 2. To ensure there is documented evidence of handover taking place at the end of each shift BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the European working time directive the amount of hours that doctors are allowed to work has been reduced, resulting in increased handovers between teams. The National Patient Safety Committee and General Medical Council have recognised that this means we need to ensure handovers are as safe and robust as possible to ensure that patient safety is not compromised. A recent serious investigation report carried out at Chase Farm Hospital, London identified a lack of formalised handover between doctors as a contributing factor leading to patient harm. One of the recommendations of the report was for a Quality Improvement Project to be carried out in order to formalise handover. The handover procedure at Chase Farm Hospital for core trainee doctors 'on-call' prior to this QIP was not standardised and consisted of an informal, verbal handover. Frustrations had been raised by doctors and other staff members that this current method of handover was unreliable and unsafe. METHOD: We sent out a questionnaire about handover to all doctors on the on-call rota to help establish what intervention would be appropriate. We then performed a retrospective collection of documented handovers within a two month time period. Our intervention was to introduce an email handover procedure. Following a two month trial of this intervention, we resent the questionnaire and performed a second retrospective collection of handover documentation. RESULT: Prior to this QIP we found that 0% of on call handovers were being formally documented. After the introduction of our handover email 88% of handovers were being formally documented using the handover email. Satisfaction with the handover procedure went from 0% being very satisfied and only 33% being satisfied to 50% being satisfied and 50% being very satisfied. CONCLUSION: A standardised and documented handover procedure is crucial for patient safety and to allow doctors to communicate jobs effectively with each other. A secure email for handover is a successful way of formalising the handover process. Limitations include: Access to the handover email for new staff or locum staff. Ensuring that doctors who aren't on the on-call rota know how to use it to handover their ward jobs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87692232022-01-31 On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’ Campling, Hannah Aubrey-Jones, Dominic BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: 1. To standardise the doctor handovers for on-call duties 2. To ensure there is documented evidence of handover taking place at the end of each shift BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the European working time directive the amount of hours that doctors are allowed to work has been reduced, resulting in increased handovers between teams. The National Patient Safety Committee and General Medical Council have recognised that this means we need to ensure handovers are as safe and robust as possible to ensure that patient safety is not compromised. A recent serious investigation report carried out at Chase Farm Hospital, London identified a lack of formalised handover between doctors as a contributing factor leading to patient harm. One of the recommendations of the report was for a Quality Improvement Project to be carried out in order to formalise handover. The handover procedure at Chase Farm Hospital for core trainee doctors 'on-call' prior to this QIP was not standardised and consisted of an informal, verbal handover. Frustrations had been raised by doctors and other staff members that this current method of handover was unreliable and unsafe. METHOD: We sent out a questionnaire about handover to all doctors on the on-call rota to help establish what intervention would be appropriate. We then performed a retrospective collection of documented handovers within a two month time period. Our intervention was to introduce an email handover procedure. Following a two month trial of this intervention, we resent the questionnaire and performed a second retrospective collection of handover documentation. RESULT: Prior to this QIP we found that 0% of on call handovers were being formally documented. After the introduction of our handover email 88% of handovers were being formally documented using the handover email. Satisfaction with the handover procedure went from 0% being very satisfied and only 33% being satisfied to 50% being satisfied and 50% being very satisfied. CONCLUSION: A standardised and documented handover procedure is crucial for patient safety and to allow doctors to communicate jobs effectively with each other. A secure email for handover is a successful way of formalising the handover process. Limitations include: Access to the handover email for new staff or locum staff. Ensuring that doctors who aren't on the on-call rota know how to use it to handover their ward jobs. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8769223/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.483 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Campling, Hannah
Aubrey-Jones, Dominic
On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title_full On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title_fullStr On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title_full_unstemmed On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title_short On-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
title_sort on-call handover ‘– if it isn't documented then it didn't happen’
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769223/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.483
work_keys_str_mv AT camplinghannah oncallhandoverifitisntdocumentedthenitdidnthappen
AT aubreyjonesdominic oncallhandoverifitisntdocumentedthenitdidnthappen