Cargando…

Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules

The objective of this study was to conduct a reliability analysis on photovoltaic (PV) modules from the oldest PV installation site in Pakistan. Four sets of modules; Type A & B (30 years old), Type C (10 years old), and Type D (35 years old) were identified for this analysis. It has been observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noman, Muhammad, Tu, Shanshan, Ahmad, Shahab, Zafar, Fahad Ullah, Khan, Haseeb Ahmad, Rehman, Sadaqat Ur, Waqas, Muhammad, Khan, Adnan Daud, Rehman, Obaid ur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261066
_version_ 1784635108468195328
author Noman, Muhammad
Tu, Shanshan
Ahmad, Shahab
Zafar, Fahad Ullah
Khan, Haseeb Ahmad
Rehman, Sadaqat Ur
Waqas, Muhammad
Khan, Adnan Daud
Rehman, Obaid ur
author_facet Noman, Muhammad
Tu, Shanshan
Ahmad, Shahab
Zafar, Fahad Ullah
Khan, Haseeb Ahmad
Rehman, Sadaqat Ur
Waqas, Muhammad
Khan, Adnan Daud
Rehman, Obaid ur
author_sort Noman, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to conduct a reliability analysis on photovoltaic (PV) modules from the oldest PV installation site in Pakistan. Four sets of modules; Type A & B (30 years old), Type C (10 years old), and Type D (35 years old) were identified for this analysis. It has been observed that modules have shown degradation after working for a good number of years in the field. Comparing with nameplate data (available for Type B & C only), a drop of 28.68% and 2.99 percentage points (pp) was observed in the output power (Pmax) and efficiency (Eff.) respectively for Type B, while a drop of 22.21% and 4.05 pp was observed in Pmax and Eff. respectively for Type C. A greater drop in I(SC) and Pmax was observed in Type B, which is attributed to severe browning of EVA in them. While the greater drop in Pmax, in case of Type C, is attributed to the poor quality of materials used. Amongst the different defects observed, the junction box defects which include cracking and embrittlement, etc., and backsheet defects which include discoloration, delamination and cracking, etc. were found in all four types of modules. Other defects include browning of EVA, observed in Type B and D, and corrosion of frame and electrical wires, found in Type A, B, and D. This first-ever study will provide valuable information in understanding the degradation mechanism and henceforth, improving the long term reliability of PV modules in the humid-subtropical conditions of Pakistan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87693272022-01-20 Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules Noman, Muhammad Tu, Shanshan Ahmad, Shahab Zafar, Fahad Ullah Khan, Haseeb Ahmad Rehman, Sadaqat Ur Waqas, Muhammad Khan, Adnan Daud Rehman, Obaid ur PLoS One Research Article The objective of this study was to conduct a reliability analysis on photovoltaic (PV) modules from the oldest PV installation site in Pakistan. Four sets of modules; Type A & B (30 years old), Type C (10 years old), and Type D (35 years old) were identified for this analysis. It has been observed that modules have shown degradation after working for a good number of years in the field. Comparing with nameplate data (available for Type B & C only), a drop of 28.68% and 2.99 percentage points (pp) was observed in the output power (Pmax) and efficiency (Eff.) respectively for Type B, while a drop of 22.21% and 4.05 pp was observed in Pmax and Eff. respectively for Type C. A greater drop in I(SC) and Pmax was observed in Type B, which is attributed to severe browning of EVA in them. While the greater drop in Pmax, in case of Type C, is attributed to the poor quality of materials used. Amongst the different defects observed, the junction box defects which include cracking and embrittlement, etc., and backsheet defects which include discoloration, delamination and cracking, etc. were found in all four types of modules. Other defects include browning of EVA, observed in Type B and D, and corrosion of frame and electrical wires, found in Type A, B, and D. This first-ever study will provide valuable information in understanding the degradation mechanism and henceforth, improving the long term reliability of PV modules in the humid-subtropical conditions of Pakistan. Public Library of Science 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8769327/ /pubmed/35045084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261066 Text en © 2022 Noman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Noman, Muhammad
Tu, Shanshan
Ahmad, Shahab
Zafar, Fahad Ullah
Khan, Haseeb Ahmad
Rehman, Sadaqat Ur
Waqas, Muhammad
Khan, Adnan Daud
Rehman, Obaid ur
Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title_full Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title_fullStr Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title_short Assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged PV modules
title_sort assessing the reliability and degradation of 10–35 years field-aged pv modules
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261066
work_keys_str_mv AT nomanmuhammad assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT tushanshan assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT ahmadshahab assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT zafarfahadullah assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT khanhaseebahmad assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT rehmansadaqatur assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT waqasmuhammad assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT khanadnandaud assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules
AT rehmanobaidur assessingthereliabilityanddegradationof1035yearsfieldagedpvmodules