Cargando…

Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey

BACKGROUND: Personal-protective equipment (PPE)-preparedness, defined as adherence to guidelines, healthcare worker (HCW) training, procuring PPE stocks and responding appropriately to suspected cases, is crucial to prevent HCW-infections. OBJECTIVES: To perform a follow-up survey to assess changes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gullapalli, Navya, Lim, Zheng Jie, Ramanathan, Kollengode, Bihari, Shailesh, Haji, Jumana, Shekar, Kiran, Wong, Wai Tat, Rajamani, Arvind, Subramaniam, Ashwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33965312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.02.007
_version_ 1784635198380441600
author Gullapalli, Navya
Lim, Zheng Jie
Ramanathan, Kollengode
Bihari, Shailesh
Haji, Jumana
Shekar, Kiran
Wong, Wai Tat
Rajamani, Arvind
Subramaniam, Ashwin
author_facet Gullapalli, Navya
Lim, Zheng Jie
Ramanathan, Kollengode
Bihari, Shailesh
Haji, Jumana
Shekar, Kiran
Wong, Wai Tat
Rajamani, Arvind
Subramaniam, Ashwin
author_sort Gullapalli, Navya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personal-protective equipment (PPE)-preparedness, defined as adherence to guidelines, healthcare worker (HCW) training, procuring PPE stocks and responding appropriately to suspected cases, is crucial to prevent HCW-infections. OBJECTIVES: To perform a follow-up survey to assess changes in PPE-preparedness across six Asia-Pacific countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A prospective follow-up cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted between 10/08/2020 to 01/09/ 2020, five months after the initial Phase 1 survey. The survey was sent to the same 231 intensivists across the six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, Philippines, and Singapore) that participated in Phase 1. The main outcome measure was to identify any changes in PPE-preparedness between Phases 1 and 2. FINDINGS: Phase 2 had responses from 132 ICUs (57%). Compared to Phase 1 respondents reported increased use of PPE-based practices such as powered air-purifying respirator (40.2% vs. 6.1%), N95-masks at all times (86.4% vs. 53.7%) and double-gloving (87.9% vs. 42.9%). The reported awareness of PPE stocks (85.6% vs. 51.9%), mandatory showering policies following PPE-breach (31.1% vs. 6.9%) and safety perception amongst HCWs (60.6% vs. 28.4%) improved significantly during Phase 2. Despite reported statistically similar adoption rate of the buddy system in both phases (42.4% vs. 37.2%), there was a reported reduction in donning/doffing training in Phase 2 (44.3% vs. 60.2%). There were no reported differences HCW training in other areas, such as tracheal intubation, intra-hospital transport and safe waste disposal, between the 2 phases. CONCLUSIONS: Overall reported PPE-preparedness improved between the two survey periods, particularly in PPE use, PPE inventory and HCW perceptions of safety. However, the uptake of HCW training and implementation of low-cost safety measures continued to be low and the awareness of PPE breach management policies were suboptimal. Therefore, the key areas for improvement should focus on regular HCW training, implementing low-cost buddy-system and increasing awareness of PPE-breach management protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87696562022-01-20 Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey Gullapalli, Navya Lim, Zheng Jie Ramanathan, Kollengode Bihari, Shailesh Haji, Jumana Shekar, Kiran Wong, Wai Tat Rajamani, Arvind Subramaniam, Ashwin Aust Crit Care Research Paper BACKGROUND: Personal-protective equipment (PPE)-preparedness, defined as adherence to guidelines, healthcare worker (HCW) training, procuring PPE stocks and responding appropriately to suspected cases, is crucial to prevent HCW-infections. OBJECTIVES: To perform a follow-up survey to assess changes in PPE-preparedness across six Asia-Pacific countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A prospective follow-up cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted between 10/08/2020 to 01/09/ 2020, five months after the initial Phase 1 survey. The survey was sent to the same 231 intensivists across the six Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, Philippines, and Singapore) that participated in Phase 1. The main outcome measure was to identify any changes in PPE-preparedness between Phases 1 and 2. FINDINGS: Phase 2 had responses from 132 ICUs (57%). Compared to Phase 1 respondents reported increased use of PPE-based practices such as powered air-purifying respirator (40.2% vs. 6.1%), N95-masks at all times (86.4% vs. 53.7%) and double-gloving (87.9% vs. 42.9%). The reported awareness of PPE stocks (85.6% vs. 51.9%), mandatory showering policies following PPE-breach (31.1% vs. 6.9%) and safety perception amongst HCWs (60.6% vs. 28.4%) improved significantly during Phase 2. Despite reported statistically similar adoption rate of the buddy system in both phases (42.4% vs. 37.2%), there was a reported reduction in donning/doffing training in Phase 2 (44.3% vs. 60.2%). There were no reported differences HCW training in other areas, such as tracheal intubation, intra-hospital transport and safe waste disposal, between the 2 phases. CONCLUSIONS: Overall reported PPE-preparedness improved between the two survey periods, particularly in PPE use, PPE inventory and HCW perceptions of safety. However, the uptake of HCW training and implementation of low-cost safety measures continued to be low and the awareness of PPE breach management policies were suboptimal. Therefore, the key areas for improvement should focus on regular HCW training, implementing low-cost buddy-system and increasing awareness of PPE-breach management protocols. Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-01 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8769656/ /pubmed/33965312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.02.007 Text en © 2021 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gullapalli, Navya
Lim, Zheng Jie
Ramanathan, Kollengode
Bihari, Shailesh
Haji, Jumana
Shekar, Kiran
Wong, Wai Tat
Rajamani, Arvind
Subramaniam, Ashwin
Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title_full Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title_fullStr Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title_full_unstemmed Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title_short Personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An Asia-Pacific follow-up survey
title_sort personal protective equipment preparedness in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: an asia-pacific follow-up survey
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33965312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT gullapallinavya personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT limzhengjie personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT ramanathankollengode personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT biharishailesh personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT hajijumana personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT shekarkiran personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT wongwaitat personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT rajamaniarvind personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey
AT subramaniamashwin personalprotectiveequipmentpreparednessinintensivecareunitsduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicanasiapacificfollowupsurvey