Cargando…

Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across the Richmond Neurodevelopmental Service (NDS). Stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability, autism or both with psychotropics (STOM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dissanayake, Anushka, Davey, Nicholas, Patel, Rupal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769994/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.242
_version_ 1784635266876571648
author Dissanayake, Anushka
Davey, Nicholas
Patel, Rupal
author_facet Dissanayake, Anushka
Davey, Nicholas
Patel, Rupal
author_sort Dissanayake, Anushka
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across the Richmond Neurodevelopmental Service (NDS). Stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability, autism or both with psychotropics (STOMP) aims to reduce the potential harm of inappropriate use of psychotropic medications. We aimed to evaluate our prescribing practices in keeping with STOMP and the NICE guidelines. METHOD: We collected information from our clinical records on patients that met the inclusion criteria (≥18 years + diagnosis of ID and autism) from October-November 2019. We gathered the following: age, sex, severity of ID, psychiatric diagnoses, psychotropic medication, presence of challenging behaviours, involvement of positive behaviour support (PBS) and documentation of a PBS plan. RESULT: 32 patients met our criteria (3:1 Male-Female ratio with an age range of 20-74 (Median 33 years old)). All 32 patients showed evidence of challenging behaviours. In the cohort, mild ID represented 18.8% (n = 6), moderate ID 40.6% (n = 13) and severe ID 40.6% (n = 13). 17 patients (53%) had a PBS plan in place. For those without a PBS plan (47%, n = 15), a referral to behavioural analysis had been considered/requested in 67% (n = 10). 31 patients were on psychotropic medication and 84% (n = 26) had an indication documented in the notes although every patient had had a medication review in the last 6 months. 67.7% (n = 21) of the prescriptions were for challenging behaviours. The average number of medications prescribed was 2 (median 2, mean 2.41) but this was reduced to 1 (median 1, mean 1.76) when additional psychiatric diagnoses and epilepsy were excluded. CONCLUSION: Prescriptions are regularly reviewed in keeping with STOMP guidance but there is more scope for utilising behaviour analysis input as well as the need to improve documentation of the rationale for psychotropic medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8769994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87699942022-01-31 Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services Dissanayake, Anushka Davey, Nicholas Patel, Rupal BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across the Richmond Neurodevelopmental Service (NDS). Stopping over-medication of people with a learning disability, autism or both with psychotropics (STOMP) aims to reduce the potential harm of inappropriate use of psychotropic medications. We aimed to evaluate our prescribing practices in keeping with STOMP and the NICE guidelines. METHOD: We collected information from our clinical records on patients that met the inclusion criteria (≥18 years + diagnosis of ID and autism) from October-November 2019. We gathered the following: age, sex, severity of ID, psychiatric diagnoses, psychotropic medication, presence of challenging behaviours, involvement of positive behaviour support (PBS) and documentation of a PBS plan. RESULT: 32 patients met our criteria (3:1 Male-Female ratio with an age range of 20-74 (Median 33 years old)). All 32 patients showed evidence of challenging behaviours. In the cohort, mild ID represented 18.8% (n = 6), moderate ID 40.6% (n = 13) and severe ID 40.6% (n = 13). 17 patients (53%) had a PBS plan in place. For those without a PBS plan (47%, n = 15), a referral to behavioural analysis had been considered/requested in 67% (n = 10). 31 patients were on psychotropic medication and 84% (n = 26) had an indication documented in the notes although every patient had had a medication review in the last 6 months. 67.7% (n = 21) of the prescriptions were for challenging behaviours. The average number of medications prescribed was 2 (median 2, mean 2.41) but this was reduced to 1 (median 1, mean 1.76) when additional psychiatric diagnoses and epilepsy were excluded. CONCLUSION: Prescriptions are regularly reviewed in keeping with STOMP guidance but there is more scope for utilising behaviour analysis input as well as the need to improve documentation of the rationale for psychotropic medications. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8769994/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.242 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Audit
Dissanayake, Anushka
Davey, Nicholas
Patel, Rupal
Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title_full Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title_fullStr Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title_full_unstemmed Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title_short Psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in Richmond Neurodevelpmental Services
title_sort psychotropic prescribing practices in adults with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder in richmond neurodevelpmental services
topic Audit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769994/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.242
work_keys_str_mv AT dissanayakeanushka psychotropicprescribingpracticesinadultswithintellectualdisabilityandautismspectrumdisorderinrichmondneurodevelpmentalservices
AT daveynicholas psychotropicprescribingpracticesinadultswithintellectualdisabilityandautismspectrumdisorderinrichmondneurodevelpmentalservices
AT patelrupal psychotropicprescribingpracticesinadultswithintellectualdisabilityandautismspectrumdisorderinrichmondneurodevelpmentalservices