Cargando…
Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews
AIMS: To improve the quality and consistency of medical seclusion reviews at St Charles Hospital and across the Trust. To ensure at least 80% compliance with minimum standards for seclusion review documentation by the end of December 2020. To increase doctors' mean perceived competence and conf...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770043/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.437 |
_version_ | 1784635278785249280 |
---|---|
author | Shalaby, Mostafa Rahman, Mehtab |
author_facet | Shalaby, Mostafa Rahman, Mehtab |
author_sort | Shalaby, Mostafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To improve the quality and consistency of medical seclusion reviews at St Charles Hospital and across the Trust. To ensure at least 80% compliance with minimum standards for seclusion review documentation by the end of December 2020. To increase doctors' mean perceived competence and confidence scores to 4.5/5 by the end of December 2020. METHOD: : A lack of consistent local or national guidance for junior doctors undertaking seclusion reviews. The quality and scope of these reviews is not consistent. There may be a need to ensure that there is more standardization and to improve junior doctors' confidence – and therefore patient safety and experience – overall. The following interventions were used to improve the quality of seclusion reviews at the hospital: Minimum standard guidelines. Presenting in Restrictive interventions meeting. Feedback from PICU consultants for guidelines. Changing guidelines. Guidelines teaching (Early November). Re-audit and new survey (Early November). Simulation training (Mid November). Seclusion teaching video (Early December- to be ready for Induction). Re-audit and new survey (Beginning of April). RESULT: Surveys were conducted before and after quality improvement interventions were put in place. The average confidence levels of junior doctors increased from 38.5% to 87% following these interventions. CONCLUSION: Revision of seclusion guidelines, junior doctor teaching and simulation training are effective interventions to improve junior doctor confidence levels in conducting seclusion reviews. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8770043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87700432022-01-31 Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews Shalaby, Mostafa Rahman, Mehtab BJPsych Open Education and Training AIMS: To improve the quality and consistency of medical seclusion reviews at St Charles Hospital and across the Trust. To ensure at least 80% compliance with minimum standards for seclusion review documentation by the end of December 2020. To increase doctors' mean perceived competence and confidence scores to 4.5/5 by the end of December 2020. METHOD: : A lack of consistent local or national guidance for junior doctors undertaking seclusion reviews. The quality and scope of these reviews is not consistent. There may be a need to ensure that there is more standardization and to improve junior doctors' confidence – and therefore patient safety and experience – overall. The following interventions were used to improve the quality of seclusion reviews at the hospital: Minimum standard guidelines. Presenting in Restrictive interventions meeting. Feedback from PICU consultants for guidelines. Changing guidelines. Guidelines teaching (Early November). Re-audit and new survey (Early November). Simulation training (Mid November). Seclusion teaching video (Early December- to be ready for Induction). Re-audit and new survey (Beginning of April). RESULT: Surveys were conducted before and after quality improvement interventions were put in place. The average confidence levels of junior doctors increased from 38.5% to 87% following these interventions. CONCLUSION: Revision of seclusion guidelines, junior doctor teaching and simulation training are effective interventions to improve junior doctor confidence levels in conducting seclusion reviews. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770043/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.437 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Education and Training Shalaby, Mostafa Rahman, Mehtab Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title | Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title_full | Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title_fullStr | Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title_short | Improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
title_sort | improving the confidence and competence of junior doctors in conducting seclusion reviews |
topic | Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770043/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shalabymostafa improvingtheconfidenceandcompetenceofjuniordoctorsinconductingseclusionreviews AT rahmanmehtab improvingtheconfidenceandcompetenceofjuniordoctorsinconductingseclusionreviews |