Cargando…

Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients

AIMS: Project aim: To reduce the use of oral psychotropic PRN* medication on Ward 3 AMHIC (Acute Mental Health Inpatient Centre) by 20% by May 2020 (*PRN = Pro re nata/As required) On Ward 3, we identified a number of unintended negative consequences of PRN medication to both patients and staff. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Zoe, Morrow, Rachel, McGee, Meta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770062/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.561
_version_ 1784635283322437632
author Moore, Zoe
Morrow, Rachel
McGee, Meta
author_facet Moore, Zoe
Morrow, Rachel
McGee, Meta
author_sort Moore, Zoe
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Project aim: To reduce the use of oral psychotropic PRN* medication on Ward 3 AMHIC (Acute Mental Health Inpatient Centre) by 20% by May 2020 (*PRN = Pro re nata/As required) On Ward 3, we identified a number of unintended negative consequences of PRN medication to both patients and staff. These included issues with over-use, dependence and side effects; as well as loss of staff ownership and challenging interactions with patients, (including escalation to aggression). Following the success of our Child and Adolescent Mental Health Inpatient colleagues in this area, we decided to embark on a project to change practice within our ward. METHOD: In order to quantify the problem, we first collected baseline data on current use of psychotropic PRN medication. As a multidisciplinary project team, we then brainstormed potential contributory factors and displayed these visually as a driver diagram. 1. Safe prescribing. 2. Safe administration, 3. Safety culture. Project measures were also agreed as follows: Outcome: Number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered per week Balancing: Violent incidents; IM administrations of psychotropic medication Process: Time taken to complete interventions; Patient and staff satisfaction. Change ideas were selected and implemented sequentially, using Plan-Do-Study- Act methodology. 1. Weekly review of PRN prescribing. 2. Nursing administration sheet. Data were collected weekly and plotted on our run chart. RESULT: By the end of May 2020, we had exceeded our initial goal, reducing the weekly median number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered by over 30%. Our balancing measures remained stable and we gained useful insights and development ideas from a staff survey. Further change ideas were planned for implementation over the months that followed, however, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the project lost some momentum. CONCLUSION: Despite running into some difficulty over recent months, the team remain motivated to maintain and build upon our previous success. In the past few weeks, “Calm Cards”, (a patient-centred intervention promoting use of individualised alternative coping strategies), have been introduced. We hope that the outcomes of this intervention will be positive, both in terms of further reducing use of PRN medication and encouraging development of skills which can be utilised beyond the hospital environment. We also intend to share our learning with colleagues and explore the possibility of introducing the project to other wards within the hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87700622022-01-31 Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients Moore, Zoe Morrow, Rachel McGee, Meta BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: Project aim: To reduce the use of oral psychotropic PRN* medication on Ward 3 AMHIC (Acute Mental Health Inpatient Centre) by 20% by May 2020 (*PRN = Pro re nata/As required) On Ward 3, we identified a number of unintended negative consequences of PRN medication to both patients and staff. These included issues with over-use, dependence and side effects; as well as loss of staff ownership and challenging interactions with patients, (including escalation to aggression). Following the success of our Child and Adolescent Mental Health Inpatient colleagues in this area, we decided to embark on a project to change practice within our ward. METHOD: In order to quantify the problem, we first collected baseline data on current use of psychotropic PRN medication. As a multidisciplinary project team, we then brainstormed potential contributory factors and displayed these visually as a driver diagram. 1. Safe prescribing. 2. Safe administration, 3. Safety culture. Project measures were also agreed as follows: Outcome: Number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered per week Balancing: Violent incidents; IM administrations of psychotropic medication Process: Time taken to complete interventions; Patient and staff satisfaction. Change ideas were selected and implemented sequentially, using Plan-Do-Study- Act methodology. 1. Weekly review of PRN prescribing. 2. Nursing administration sheet. Data were collected weekly and plotted on our run chart. RESULT: By the end of May 2020, we had exceeded our initial goal, reducing the weekly median number of doses of oral psychotropic PRN medication administered by over 30%. Our balancing measures remained stable and we gained useful insights and development ideas from a staff survey. Further change ideas were planned for implementation over the months that followed, however, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the project lost some momentum. CONCLUSION: Despite running into some difficulty over recent months, the team remain motivated to maintain and build upon our previous success. In the past few weeks, “Calm Cards”, (a patient-centred intervention promoting use of individualised alternative coping strategies), have been introduced. We hope that the outcomes of this intervention will be positive, both in terms of further reducing use of PRN medication and encouraging development of skills which can be utilised beyond the hospital environment. We also intend to share our learning with colleagues and explore the possibility of introducing the project to other wards within the hospital. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770062/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.561 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Moore, Zoe
Morrow, Rachel
McGee, Meta
Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title_full Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title_fullStr Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title_short Reducing the use of oral psychotropic PRN medication in acute mental health inpatients
title_sort reducing the use of oral psychotropic prn medication in acute mental health inpatients
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770062/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.561
work_keys_str_mv AT moorezoe reducingtheuseoforalpsychotropicprnmedicationinacutementalhealthinpatients
AT morrowrachel reducingtheuseoforalpsychotropicprnmedicationinacutementalhealthinpatients
AT mcgeemeta reducingtheuseoforalpsychotropicprnmedicationinacutementalhealthinpatients