Cargando…

A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic

AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mudiyanselage, Irangani, Belgamwar, Madhvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770086/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565
_version_ 1784635289147277312
author Mudiyanselage, Irangani
Belgamwar, Madhvi
author_facet Mudiyanselage, Irangani
Belgamwar, Madhvi
author_sort Mudiyanselage, Irangani
collection PubMed
description AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doctors who have changed their practice to include writing letters directly to patients have more patient centred consultations and experience smoother handovers with other members of their multidisciplinary teams. (Rayner et al, BMJ 2020) The aim of the study was to obtain patient's views to improve the quality of clinical letters sent to them, hence the level of communication and standards of care. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and posted to collect information from patients attending one of the South County Mental Health outpatient clinic in Derbyshire. 50 random patients were selected between March to November 2020. Patients were asked to provide suggestions to improve the quality of their clinic letters written directly to them and copies sent to their GPs. RESULT: Out of 50 patients 48% (n = 24) responded. Majority of patients (92%) expressed their wish to receive their clinic letters written directly to them and 79% preferred to be addressed as a second person in the letters. More than half (54%, N = 13) of them would like to have letter by post. Majority of them (92%, N = 22) wished to have their letter within a week of their consultations. Patients attending clinics felt that the communication could be better improved through writing clearly: a) reflection of what was discussed during the consultation b) updated diagnosis c) a clear follow-up plan d) current level of support e) medication change f) emergency contact numbers g) actions to be carried out by their GP and further referrals should there be any. CONCLUSION: Patients in community prefer to have their clinic letters directly addressing them in second person. It was noted that the letters needed to reflect accurately on what was discussed during the consultation in order to have patient centered consultations. This in turn would improve communication and thus rapport, trust and overall therapeutic relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87700862022-01-31 A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic Mudiyanselage, Irangani Belgamwar, Madhvi BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doctors who have changed their practice to include writing letters directly to patients have more patient centred consultations and experience smoother handovers with other members of their multidisciplinary teams. (Rayner et al, BMJ 2020) The aim of the study was to obtain patient's views to improve the quality of clinical letters sent to them, hence the level of communication and standards of care. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and posted to collect information from patients attending one of the South County Mental Health outpatient clinic in Derbyshire. 50 random patients were selected between March to November 2020. Patients were asked to provide suggestions to improve the quality of their clinic letters written directly to them and copies sent to their GPs. RESULT: Out of 50 patients 48% (n = 24) responded. Majority of patients (92%) expressed their wish to receive their clinic letters written directly to them and 79% preferred to be addressed as a second person in the letters. More than half (54%, N = 13) of them would like to have letter by post. Majority of them (92%, N = 22) wished to have their letter within a week of their consultations. Patients attending clinics felt that the communication could be better improved through writing clearly: a) reflection of what was discussed during the consultation b) updated diagnosis c) a clear follow-up plan d) current level of support e) medication change f) emergency contact numbers g) actions to be carried out by their GP and further referrals should there be any. CONCLUSION: Patients in community prefer to have their clinic letters directly addressing them in second person. It was noted that the letters needed to reflect accurately on what was discussed during the consultation in order to have patient centered consultations. This in turn would improve communication and thus rapport, trust and overall therapeutic relationship. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770086/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Mudiyanselage, Irangani
Belgamwar, Madhvi
A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title_full A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title_fullStr A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title_full_unstemmed A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title_short A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
title_sort study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770086/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565
work_keys_str_mv AT mudiyanselageirangani astudytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic
AT belgamwarmadhvi astudytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic
AT mudiyanselageirangani studytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic
AT belgamwarmadhvi studytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic