Cargando…
A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic
AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doct...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770086/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565 |
_version_ | 1784635289147277312 |
---|---|
author | Mudiyanselage, Irangani Belgamwar, Madhvi |
author_facet | Mudiyanselage, Irangani Belgamwar, Madhvi |
author_sort | Mudiyanselage, Irangani |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doctors who have changed their practice to include writing letters directly to patients have more patient centred consultations and experience smoother handovers with other members of their multidisciplinary teams. (Rayner et al, BMJ 2020) The aim of the study was to obtain patient's views to improve the quality of clinical letters sent to them, hence the level of communication and standards of care. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and posted to collect information from patients attending one of the South County Mental Health outpatient clinic in Derbyshire. 50 random patients were selected between March to November 2020. Patients were asked to provide suggestions to improve the quality of their clinic letters written directly to them and copies sent to their GPs. RESULT: Out of 50 patients 48% (n = 24) responded. Majority of patients (92%) expressed their wish to receive their clinic letters written directly to them and 79% preferred to be addressed as a second person in the letters. More than half (54%, N = 13) of them would like to have letter by post. Majority of them (92%, N = 22) wished to have their letter within a week of their consultations. Patients attending clinics felt that the communication could be better improved through writing clearly: a) reflection of what was discussed during the consultation b) updated diagnosis c) a clear follow-up plan d) current level of support e) medication change f) emergency contact numbers g) actions to be carried out by their GP and further referrals should there be any. CONCLUSION: Patients in community prefer to have their clinic letters directly addressing them in second person. It was noted that the letters needed to reflect accurately on what was discussed during the consultation in order to have patient centered consultations. This in turn would improve communication and thus rapport, trust and overall therapeutic relationship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8770086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87700862022-01-31 A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic Mudiyanselage, Irangani Belgamwar, Madhvi BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: In many countries (including the UK and Australia) it is still common practice for hospital doctors to write letters to patients’ general practitioners (GPs) following outpatient consultations, and for patients to receive copies of these letters. However, experience suggests that hospital doctors who have changed their practice to include writing letters directly to patients have more patient centred consultations and experience smoother handovers with other members of their multidisciplinary teams. (Rayner et al, BMJ 2020) The aim of the study was to obtain patient's views to improve the quality of clinical letters sent to them, hence the level of communication and standards of care. METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and posted to collect information from patients attending one of the South County Mental Health outpatient clinic in Derbyshire. 50 random patients were selected between March to November 2020. Patients were asked to provide suggestions to improve the quality of their clinic letters written directly to them and copies sent to their GPs. RESULT: Out of 50 patients 48% (n = 24) responded. Majority of patients (92%) expressed their wish to receive their clinic letters written directly to them and 79% preferred to be addressed as a second person in the letters. More than half (54%, N = 13) of them would like to have letter by post. Majority of them (92%, N = 22) wished to have their letter within a week of their consultations. Patients attending clinics felt that the communication could be better improved through writing clearly: a) reflection of what was discussed during the consultation b) updated diagnosis c) a clear follow-up plan d) current level of support e) medication change f) emergency contact numbers g) actions to be carried out by their GP and further referrals should there be any. CONCLUSION: Patients in community prefer to have their clinic letters directly addressing them in second person. It was noted that the letters needed to reflect accurately on what was discussed during the consultation in order to have patient centered consultations. This in turn would improve communication and thus rapport, trust and overall therapeutic relationship. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770086/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Mudiyanselage, Irangani Belgamwar, Madhvi A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title | A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title_full | A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title_fullStr | A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title_short | A study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
title_sort | study to improve the quality of writing clinic letters to patients attending the outpatient clinic |
topic | Quality Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770086/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mudiyanselageirangani astudytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic AT belgamwarmadhvi astudytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic AT mudiyanselageirangani studytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic AT belgamwarmadhvi studytoimprovethequalityofwritingclinicletterstopatientsattendingtheoutpatientclinic |