Cargando…

Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia

AIMS: This audit aimed to assess to what extent patients being referred for assessment of memory problems were receiving appropriate screening for reversible causes. We considered the blood tests recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). BACKGROUND: Research into ‘reversi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herbert, Kim, Richardson, Elspeth, Daly, Adam, Carswell, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770158/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.254
_version_ 1784635304928346112
author Herbert, Kim
Richardson, Elspeth
Daly, Adam
Carswell, Christine
author_facet Herbert, Kim
Richardson, Elspeth
Daly, Adam
Carswell, Christine
author_sort Herbert, Kim
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This audit aimed to assess to what extent patients being referred for assessment of memory problems were receiving appropriate screening for reversible causes. We considered the blood tests recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). BACKGROUND: Research into ‘reversible dementias’ identified numerous common underlying causes. As a result of this NICE complied comprehensive guidance on investigations which should be performed in the initial stages of assessing patients with memory problems, ideally at a primary care level. These investigations are also crucial at the point of secondary care assessment in order to make a confident diagnosis. METHOD: Details of patients referred by their GP to the Older Adult CMHT with memory problems over a one month period were collected. We then used the local laboratory database to note whether each of the eight recommended blood tests had been performed in the preceding 6 months. We measured this against an agreed standard of 95%. After the first cycle of data collection we prepared business-card sized ‘aide memoirs’ for GPs that could serve as a quick reminder. These were sent out to all GPs in the area along with a letter outlining the audit findings. RESULT: Overall 31 patients were included in the first cycle. 15 patients had all 8 dementia blood screens (48%), 13 (42%) had some of the recommended tests and 3 patients had no screening tests at all (10%). On average patients had 76.6% of the recommended bloods completed. The most commonly completed tests were Full Blood Count (FBC) and Urea & Electrolytes (U&Es), with blood Glucose being the most frequently omitted. In cycle 2, 20 patients were included. Of these patients, 10 had the full complement of screening bloods (50%); 8 had some tests completed (40%) and 2 patients had no screening tests complete (10%). On average 76% of tests were completed. There was an improvement in the rate of completion of both Glucose and Liver Function Tests from cycle1. CONCLUSION: This audit demonstrated that current practice does not meet the national standard in general. Our intervention produced a modest improvement in the proportion of patients who received a full complement of dementia screening tests, as well as increasing the rate of patients receiving a blood glucose as part of their screening. It would likely be beneficial to consider further intervention and a 3rd audit cycle in due course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87701582022-01-31 Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia Herbert, Kim Richardson, Elspeth Daly, Adam Carswell, Christine BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: This audit aimed to assess to what extent patients being referred for assessment of memory problems were receiving appropriate screening for reversible causes. We considered the blood tests recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). BACKGROUND: Research into ‘reversible dementias’ identified numerous common underlying causes. As a result of this NICE complied comprehensive guidance on investigations which should be performed in the initial stages of assessing patients with memory problems, ideally at a primary care level. These investigations are also crucial at the point of secondary care assessment in order to make a confident diagnosis. METHOD: Details of patients referred by their GP to the Older Adult CMHT with memory problems over a one month period were collected. We then used the local laboratory database to note whether each of the eight recommended blood tests had been performed in the preceding 6 months. We measured this against an agreed standard of 95%. After the first cycle of data collection we prepared business-card sized ‘aide memoirs’ for GPs that could serve as a quick reminder. These were sent out to all GPs in the area along with a letter outlining the audit findings. RESULT: Overall 31 patients were included in the first cycle. 15 patients had all 8 dementia blood screens (48%), 13 (42%) had some of the recommended tests and 3 patients had no screening tests at all (10%). On average patients had 76.6% of the recommended bloods completed. The most commonly completed tests were Full Blood Count (FBC) and Urea & Electrolytes (U&Es), with blood Glucose being the most frequently omitted. In cycle 2, 20 patients were included. Of these patients, 10 had the full complement of screening bloods (50%); 8 had some tests completed (40%) and 2 patients had no screening tests complete (10%). On average 76% of tests were completed. There was an improvement in the rate of completion of both Glucose and Liver Function Tests from cycle1. CONCLUSION: This audit demonstrated that current practice does not meet the national standard in general. Our intervention produced a modest improvement in the proportion of patients who received a full complement of dementia screening tests, as well as increasing the rate of patients receiving a blood glucose as part of their screening. It would likely be beneficial to consider further intervention and a 3rd audit cycle in due course. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770158/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.254 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Audit
Herbert, Kim
Richardson, Elspeth
Daly, Adam
Carswell, Christine
Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title_full Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title_fullStr Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title_full_unstemmed Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title_short Dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
title_sort dementia screening: an audit of screening for reversible causes of dementia
topic Audit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770158/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.254
work_keys_str_mv AT herbertkim dementiascreeninganauditofscreeningforreversiblecausesofdementia
AT richardsonelspeth dementiascreeninganauditofscreeningforreversiblecausesofdementia
AT dalyadam dementiascreeninganauditofscreeningforreversiblecausesofdementia
AT carswellchristine dementiascreeninganauditofscreeningforreversiblecausesofdementia