Cargando…

PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit

AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to assess the adherence of a hospital psychiatric liaison team's documentation of assessments to the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) standards framework; to identify areas of improvement; to identify barriers to and improve adherence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Edie, Adams, Catherine, Maclaren, Thomas, Brown, Fergus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770219/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.589
_version_ 1784635319726899200
author Shaw, Edie
Adams, Catherine
Maclaren, Thomas
Brown, Fergus
author_facet Shaw, Edie
Adams, Catherine
Maclaren, Thomas
Brown, Fergus
author_sort Shaw, Edie
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to assess the adherence of a hospital psychiatric liaison team's documentation of assessments to the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) standards framework; to identify areas of improvement; to identify barriers to and improve adherence. METHOD: Data were extracted from 27 randomly selected patient assessments from 01/07/2020 to 31/08/2020 and then 27 assessments from 01/10/2020 to 30/11/2020 for re-audit. Quantitative data was collected by calculating the percentage of assessments which documented each specific aspect of PLAN standards. Qualitative data including attitudes specifically towards writing to patients was gathered from 1:1 discussions with members of staff. Interventions between rounds of audit: Presentation of results of 1st data collection to team in November 2020 followed by discussion Emailed instructions to create a template based on PLAN standards for assessments to staff Lobbied for Cerner access at liaison team office to facilitate use of above RESULT: Quantitative – overall improvements were seen in adherence to all aspects of documentation of assessments including collateral history (from 23% to 67%) past medical history (30% to 70%) and acknowledging the patient/carer perspective (46% to 74%). Some improvement was seen in offering written correspondence to patients (0% to 20%). Qualitative – the majority of comments regarding writing to patients were positive, with no staff members opposing the standard (“it is best practice”, “should become a habit”). However, some barriers were identified including increased workload (“requires more editing”, “could take a lot more time”). CONCLUSION: Team adherence to PLAN standards for documentation of assessments was improved through low intensity interventions. Overall adherence was high, however certain areas leave space for improvement. The audit facilitated conversations around writing to patients on discharge, both in the form of formal gathering of qualitative data and informal discussions between staff. Attitudes towards writing these letters were positive and some improvement was seen between audits. Ongoing audit activity aims to further improve adherence and monitor improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87702192022-01-31 PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit Shaw, Edie Adams, Catherine Maclaren, Thomas Brown, Fergus BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to assess the adherence of a hospital psychiatric liaison team's documentation of assessments to the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) standards framework; to identify areas of improvement; to identify barriers to and improve adherence. METHOD: Data were extracted from 27 randomly selected patient assessments from 01/07/2020 to 31/08/2020 and then 27 assessments from 01/10/2020 to 30/11/2020 for re-audit. Quantitative data was collected by calculating the percentage of assessments which documented each specific aspect of PLAN standards. Qualitative data including attitudes specifically towards writing to patients was gathered from 1:1 discussions with members of staff. Interventions between rounds of audit: Presentation of results of 1st data collection to team in November 2020 followed by discussion Emailed instructions to create a template based on PLAN standards for assessments to staff Lobbied for Cerner access at liaison team office to facilitate use of above RESULT: Quantitative – overall improvements were seen in adherence to all aspects of documentation of assessments including collateral history (from 23% to 67%) past medical history (30% to 70%) and acknowledging the patient/carer perspective (46% to 74%). Some improvement was seen in offering written correspondence to patients (0% to 20%). Qualitative – the majority of comments regarding writing to patients were positive, with no staff members opposing the standard (“it is best practice”, “should become a habit”). However, some barriers were identified including increased workload (“requires more editing”, “could take a lot more time”). CONCLUSION: Team adherence to PLAN standards for documentation of assessments was improved through low intensity interventions. Overall adherence was high, however certain areas leave space for improvement. The audit facilitated conversations around writing to patients on discharge, both in the form of formal gathering of qualitative data and informal discussions between staff. Attitudes towards writing these letters were positive and some improvement was seen between audits. Ongoing audit activity aims to further improve adherence and monitor improvements. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770219/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.589 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Shaw, Edie
Adams, Catherine
Maclaren, Thomas
Brown, Fergus
PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title_full PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title_fullStr PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title_full_unstemmed PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title_short PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
title_sort plan standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770219/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.589
work_keys_str_mv AT shawedie planstandardsandwritingtopatientsqualityimprovementbyaudit
AT adamscatherine planstandardsandwritingtopatientsqualityimprovementbyaudit
AT maclarenthomas planstandardsandwritingtopatientsqualityimprovementbyaudit
AT brownfergus planstandardsandwritingtopatientsqualityimprovementbyaudit