Cargando…
A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity
AIMS: To audit the completion of Adults with Incapacity (AWI) documents (Assessment of Capacity, Section 47 Certificate of Incapacity and Treatment Plan) to ensure they met the legal standards required. We hypothesised that the forms were not all completed comprehensively, particularly with regards...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770225/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.255 |
_version_ | 1784635321166594048 |
---|---|
author | Hoggard, Tereza Holliday, Robin Julyan, Everett |
author_facet | Hoggard, Tereza Holliday, Robin Julyan, Everett |
author_sort | Hoggard, Tereza |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To audit the completion of Adults with Incapacity (AWI) documents (Assessment of Capacity, Section 47 Certificate of Incapacity and Treatment Plan) to ensure they met the legal standards required. We hypothesised that the forms were not all completed comprehensively, particularly with regards to the Treatment Plans. METHOD: In addition to being legal documents, AWI documents provide an important framework to guide clinicians when giving treatment and balancing patient safety with patient autonomy. Correctly completed documents help provide vulnerable patients with ethical and lawful treatment that allows them to be treated with respect and dignity. An audit was conducted across two Old Age Psychiatry wards at Ayrshire Central Hospital during October 2020. We assessed all AWI documents available on the wards (n = 20) using criteria based on the standards set by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland to ensure legal competence. RESULT: 95% of the forms were signed and dated, and the nature of the incapacity was given in 100% of the documents. On the other hand, 35% of the forms gave no indication of the presence or absence of a guardian. Only one of those identified as having a guardian was consulted with regards to the treatment plan. Another member of staff was consulted on the Treatment Plan in 45% of cases. 30% of the Treatment Plans were not precisely worded enough to be considered justifiable for treatment. In the Certificate of Incapacity, two out-of-date certificates were found, and staff were notified immediately. 45% of certificates were considered over-generalised with regards to the description under medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Overall, the forms were mostly signed and dated, with the nature of incapacity given. The two areas that appeared to be the most problematic were the issue of identifying and discussing plans with a guardian, and the specification of treatment covered by both the Certificate of Incapacity and the Treatment Plan. Discussion with members of the healthcare team found some confusion over how to complete the forms and many cited a lack of formal training as the main reason for their uncertainty. In addition, accessing clear information online or on the wards on how to complete the forms was challenging. We intend to improve the completion of these documents by implementing teaching and a guidance poster, based on the areas that we identified as being problematic, and completing the audit cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8770225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87702252022-01-31 A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity Hoggard, Tereza Holliday, Robin Julyan, Everett BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: To audit the completion of Adults with Incapacity (AWI) documents (Assessment of Capacity, Section 47 Certificate of Incapacity and Treatment Plan) to ensure they met the legal standards required. We hypothesised that the forms were not all completed comprehensively, particularly with regards to the Treatment Plans. METHOD: In addition to being legal documents, AWI documents provide an important framework to guide clinicians when giving treatment and balancing patient safety with patient autonomy. Correctly completed documents help provide vulnerable patients with ethical and lawful treatment that allows them to be treated with respect and dignity. An audit was conducted across two Old Age Psychiatry wards at Ayrshire Central Hospital during October 2020. We assessed all AWI documents available on the wards (n = 20) using criteria based on the standards set by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland to ensure legal competence. RESULT: 95% of the forms were signed and dated, and the nature of the incapacity was given in 100% of the documents. On the other hand, 35% of the forms gave no indication of the presence or absence of a guardian. Only one of those identified as having a guardian was consulted with regards to the treatment plan. Another member of staff was consulted on the Treatment Plan in 45% of cases. 30% of the Treatment Plans were not precisely worded enough to be considered justifiable for treatment. In the Certificate of Incapacity, two out-of-date certificates were found, and staff were notified immediately. 45% of certificates were considered over-generalised with regards to the description under medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Overall, the forms were mostly signed and dated, with the nature of incapacity given. The two areas that appeared to be the most problematic were the issue of identifying and discussing plans with a guardian, and the specification of treatment covered by both the Certificate of Incapacity and the Treatment Plan. Discussion with members of the healthcare team found some confusion over how to complete the forms and many cited a lack of formal training as the main reason for their uncertainty. In addition, accessing clear information online or on the wards on how to complete the forms was challenging. We intend to improve the completion of these documents by implementing teaching and a guidance poster, based on the areas that we identified as being problematic, and completing the audit cycle. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770225/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.255 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Audit Hoggard, Tereza Holliday, Robin Julyan, Everett A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title | A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title_full | A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title_fullStr | A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title_short | A review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
title_sort | review of documents assessing capacity and treatment needs to safeguard adults with incapacity |
topic | Audit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770225/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoggardtereza areviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity AT hollidayrobin areviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity AT julyaneverett areviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity AT hoggardtereza reviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity AT hollidayrobin reviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity AT julyaneverett reviewofdocumentsassessingcapacityandtreatmentneedstosafeguardadultswithincapacity |