Cargando…

An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: We developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Junjie, Yan, Derui, Bai, Lu, Geng, Ruirui, Zhao, Xulun, Li, Huijun, Dong, Yongfei, Cao, Jianping, Tang, Zaixiang, Liu, Song-bai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.816053
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment responsiveness. WGCNA was used to identify the most relevant modules to radiotherapy response. Based on the module genes, Cox regression model was used to build survival prognosis signature to distinguish the benefit group of radiotherapy. An external validation was also performed. RESULTS: In the developed dataset, MEbrown module with 534 genes was identified by WGCNA, which was most correlated to the radiotherapy response of patients. A number of 11 hub genes were selected to build the survival prognosis signature. Patients that were divided into radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group based on the signature risk score had varied survival benefit. In developed dataset, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUC of the signature were 0.814 (CI95%: 0.742–0.905), 0.781 (CI95%: 0.682–0.880), and 0.762 (CI95%: 0.626–0.897), respectively. In validation dataset, the 3- and 5-year AUC of the signature were 0.706 (CI95%: 0.523–0.889) and 0.743 (CI95%: 0.595–0.891). The signature had higher predictive power than clinical factors alone and had more clinical prognosis efficiency. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the identified genes were mainly enriched in immune-related processes. Further immune estimated analysis showed the difference in distribution of immune micro-environment between radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group. CONCLUSIONS: The 11-gene signature may reflect differences in tumor immune micro-environment that underlie the differential response to radiation therapy and could guide clinical-decision making related to radiation in breast cancer patients.