Cargando…

An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: We developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Junjie, Yan, Derui, Bai, Lu, Geng, Ruirui, Zhao, Xulun, Li, Huijun, Dong, Yongfei, Cao, Jianping, Tang, Zaixiang, Liu, Song-bai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.816053
_version_ 1784635365822300160
author Shen, Junjie
Yan, Derui
Bai, Lu
Geng, Ruirui
Zhao, Xulun
Li, Huijun
Dong, Yongfei
Cao, Jianping
Tang, Zaixiang
Liu, Song-bai
author_facet Shen, Junjie
Yan, Derui
Bai, Lu
Geng, Ruirui
Zhao, Xulun
Li, Huijun
Dong, Yongfei
Cao, Jianping
Tang, Zaixiang
Liu, Song-bai
author_sort Shen, Junjie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment responsiveness. WGCNA was used to identify the most relevant modules to radiotherapy response. Based on the module genes, Cox regression model was used to build survival prognosis signature to distinguish the benefit group of radiotherapy. An external validation was also performed. RESULTS: In the developed dataset, MEbrown module with 534 genes was identified by WGCNA, which was most correlated to the radiotherapy response of patients. A number of 11 hub genes were selected to build the survival prognosis signature. Patients that were divided into radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group based on the signature risk score had varied survival benefit. In developed dataset, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUC of the signature were 0.814 (CI95%: 0.742–0.905), 0.781 (CI95%: 0.682–0.880), and 0.762 (CI95%: 0.626–0.897), respectively. In validation dataset, the 3- and 5-year AUC of the signature were 0.706 (CI95%: 0.523–0.889) and 0.743 (CI95%: 0.595–0.891). The signature had higher predictive power than clinical factors alone and had more clinical prognosis efficiency. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the identified genes were mainly enriched in immune-related processes. Further immune estimated analysis showed the difference in distribution of immune micro-environment between radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group. CONCLUSIONS: The 11-gene signature may reflect differences in tumor immune micro-environment that underlie the differential response to radiation therapy and could guide clinical-decision making related to radiation in breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87704132022-01-21 An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients Shen, Junjie Yan, Derui Bai, Lu Geng, Ruirui Zhao, Xulun Li, Huijun Dong, Yongfei Cao, Jianping Tang, Zaixiang Liu, Song-bai Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: We developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment responsiveness. WGCNA was used to identify the most relevant modules to radiotherapy response. Based on the module genes, Cox regression model was used to build survival prognosis signature to distinguish the benefit group of radiotherapy. An external validation was also performed. RESULTS: In the developed dataset, MEbrown module with 534 genes was identified by WGCNA, which was most correlated to the radiotherapy response of patients. A number of 11 hub genes were selected to build the survival prognosis signature. Patients that were divided into radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group based on the signature risk score had varied survival benefit. In developed dataset, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUC of the signature were 0.814 (CI95%: 0.742–0.905), 0.781 (CI95%: 0.682–0.880), and 0.762 (CI95%: 0.626–0.897), respectively. In validation dataset, the 3- and 5-year AUC of the signature were 0.706 (CI95%: 0.523–0.889) and 0.743 (CI95%: 0.595–0.891). The signature had higher predictive power than clinical factors alone and had more clinical prognosis efficiency. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the identified genes were mainly enriched in immune-related processes. Further immune estimated analysis showed the difference in distribution of immune micro-environment between radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group. CONCLUSIONS: The 11-gene signature may reflect differences in tumor immune micro-environment that underlie the differential response to radiation therapy and could guide clinical-decision making related to radiation in breast cancer patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8770413/ /pubmed/35071020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.816053 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shen, Yan, Bai, Geng, Zhao, Li, Dong, Cao, Tang and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shen, Junjie
Yan, Derui
Bai, Lu
Geng, Ruirui
Zhao, Xulun
Li, Huijun
Dong, Yongfei
Cao, Jianping
Tang, Zaixiang
Liu, Song-bai
An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title_full An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title_fullStr An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title_short An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients
title_sort 11-gene signature based on treatment responsiveness predicts radiation therapy survival benefit among breast cancer patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.816053
work_keys_str_mv AT shenjunjie an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT yanderui an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT bailu an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT gengruirui an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT zhaoxulun an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT lihuijun an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT dongyongfei an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT caojianping an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT tangzaixiang an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT liusongbai an11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT shenjunjie 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT yanderui 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT bailu 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT gengruirui 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT zhaoxulun 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT lihuijun 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT dongyongfei 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT caojianping 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT tangzaixiang 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients
AT liusongbai 11genesignaturebasedontreatmentresponsivenesspredictsradiationtherapysurvivalbenefitamongbreastcancerpatients