Cargando…

Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times

AIMS: To improve the one hour response times to referrals made to psychiatric Liaison in A&E without adding or changing available resources. METHOD: Response time data of referrals made to the Homerton University Hospital psychiatric liaison service was collected dating back from August 2016 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Svedberg, Kaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770456/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.595
_version_ 1784635376612147200
author Svedberg, Kaj
author_facet Svedberg, Kaj
author_sort Svedberg, Kaj
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To improve the one hour response times to referrals made to psychiatric Liaison in A&E without adding or changing available resources. METHOD: Response time data of referrals made to the Homerton University Hospital psychiatric liaison service was collected dating back from August 2016 to October 2019 (n = 10225). A nudge was introduced in the form of a large display showing referrals arriving in real time in the staff office. Data was then collected over a period of 5 weeks (n = 436) to measure if any change had occurred in response times. RESULT: Response times appear to follow a Poisson like distribution curve. The average referral was responded to within 6 minutes (n = 1577) prior to the nudge, and 6 minutes (n = 88) after. Prior to the nudge the 95% referral envelope fell within 134 minutes (n = 9728) and was 122 minutes (n = 414) after the intervention. Significant statistical difference is observed upon considering response in the first 240 minutes. CONCLUSION: Nudge interventions could be a useful resource-sparing method to improve services. The average referral to the HUH liaison team was quickly responded to within 6 minutes and yet hitting the 1 hour 95% target appears ever-elusive. Hitting targets of 95% responses within 1 hour may prove very difficult if we are not considering natural distributions, such as Poisson, occuring in the backgroung which ultimately may require a change in approaches to how we set performance targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87704562022-01-31 Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times Svedberg, Kaj BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: To improve the one hour response times to referrals made to psychiatric Liaison in A&E without adding or changing available resources. METHOD: Response time data of referrals made to the Homerton University Hospital psychiatric liaison service was collected dating back from August 2016 to October 2019 (n = 10225). A nudge was introduced in the form of a large display showing referrals arriving in real time in the staff office. Data was then collected over a period of 5 weeks (n = 436) to measure if any change had occurred in response times. RESULT: Response times appear to follow a Poisson like distribution curve. The average referral was responded to within 6 minutes (n = 1577) prior to the nudge, and 6 minutes (n = 88) after. Prior to the nudge the 95% referral envelope fell within 134 minutes (n = 9728) and was 122 minutes (n = 414) after the intervention. Significant statistical difference is observed upon considering response in the first 240 minutes. CONCLUSION: Nudge interventions could be a useful resource-sparing method to improve services. The average referral to the HUH liaison team was quickly responded to within 6 minutes and yet hitting the 1 hour 95% target appears ever-elusive. Hitting targets of 95% responses within 1 hour may prove very difficult if we are not considering natural distributions, such as Poisson, occuring in the backgroung which ultimately may require a change in approaches to how we set performance targets. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770456/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.595 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Svedberg, Kaj
Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title_full Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title_fullStr Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title_full_unstemmed Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title_short Why is hitting A&E time targets so hard?: using Nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
title_sort why is hitting a&e time targets so hard?: using nudge theory and modelling to improve response times
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770456/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.595
work_keys_str_mv AT svedbergkaj whyishittingaetimetargetssohardusingnudgetheoryandmodellingtoimproveresponsetimes