Cargando…

Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth

OBJECTIVE: There is limited research surrounding facilitated early discharge (FD) and Home Treatment Teams (HTTs). This study aimed to compare patients who received FD with patients who were discharged without FD to identify whether there were significant differences in terms of social demographics,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firdosi, Mudasir, Hubbeling, Allerdiena, Kapoor, Twaisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.336
_version_ 1784635397868879872
author Firdosi, Mudasir
Hubbeling, Allerdiena
Kapoor, Twaisha
author_facet Firdosi, Mudasir
Hubbeling, Allerdiena
Kapoor, Twaisha
author_sort Firdosi, Mudasir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is limited research surrounding facilitated early discharge (FD) and Home Treatment Teams (HTTs). This study aimed to compare patients who received FD with patients who were discharged without FD to identify whether there were significant differences in terms of social demographics, illness characteristics, health outcome and treatment duration. Using this data we furthermore aimed to provide proposals to help advance the effectiveness of FD, as well as suggesting concepts of where future research should lie. CASE REPORT: A randomised sample of patients who received FD and patients who were discharged without FD was obtained from a South London Hospital. This was manually narrowed down to patients specifically treated by the Wandsworth Home Treatment Team (WHTT). Socio-demographic and clinical data were then attained from the patients’ electronic records to compare and statistically analyse between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Patients who received FD from the WHTT were found to have significantly less previous psychiatric admissions compared to those who were discharged without FD (p = 0.032). All other variables were found to have no association with FD. CONCLUSION: Having a high number of previous psychiatric admissions seems to be an aspect that decreases the chance of being allocated FD. This variable can be seen as an indicator of severity of illness and a challenging social environment; it could therefore be valuable to take this variable into consideration when allocating FD. Furthermore, total treatment duration was found to not be significantly different for FD and non-FD patients, thus supporting the use of CRHTTs as an equivalent alternative for inpatient admission, however, national scale research should be conducted to strengthen and expand on these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87705452022-01-31 Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth Firdosi, Mudasir Hubbeling, Allerdiena Kapoor, Twaisha BJPsych Open Case Study OBJECTIVE: There is limited research surrounding facilitated early discharge (FD) and Home Treatment Teams (HTTs). This study aimed to compare patients who received FD with patients who were discharged without FD to identify whether there were significant differences in terms of social demographics, illness characteristics, health outcome and treatment duration. Using this data we furthermore aimed to provide proposals to help advance the effectiveness of FD, as well as suggesting concepts of where future research should lie. CASE REPORT: A randomised sample of patients who received FD and patients who were discharged without FD was obtained from a South London Hospital. This was manually narrowed down to patients specifically treated by the Wandsworth Home Treatment Team (WHTT). Socio-demographic and clinical data were then attained from the patients’ electronic records to compare and statistically analyse between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Patients who received FD from the WHTT were found to have significantly less previous psychiatric admissions compared to those who were discharged without FD (p = 0.032). All other variables were found to have no association with FD. CONCLUSION: Having a high number of previous psychiatric admissions seems to be an aspect that decreases the chance of being allocated FD. This variable can be seen as an indicator of severity of illness and a challenging social environment; it could therefore be valuable to take this variable into consideration when allocating FD. Furthermore, total treatment duration was found to not be significantly different for FD and non-FD patients, thus supporting the use of CRHTTs as an equivalent alternative for inpatient admission, however, national scale research should be conducted to strengthen and expand on these findings. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770545/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.336 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Firdosi, Mudasir
Hubbeling, Allerdiena
Kapoor, Twaisha
Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title_full Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title_fullStr Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title_full_unstemmed Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title_short Facilitated early discharge in Wandsworth
title_sort facilitated early discharge in wandsworth
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.336
work_keys_str_mv AT firdosimudasir facilitatedearlydischargeinwandsworth
AT hubbelingallerdiena facilitatedearlydischargeinwandsworth
AT kapoortwaisha facilitatedearlydischargeinwandsworth