Cargando…

Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The DNA-damage immune-response (DDIR) signature is an immune-driven gene expression signature retrospectively validated as predicting response to anthracycline-based therapy. This feasibility study prospectively evaluates the use of this assay to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkes, Eileen E., Savage, Kienan I., Lioe, Tong, Boyd, Clinton, Halliday, Sophia, Walker, Steven M., Lowry, Keith, Knight, Laura, Buckley, Niamh E., Grogan, Andrena, Logan, Gemma E., Clayton, Alison, Hurwitz, Jane, Kirk, Stephen J., Xu, Jiamei, Sidi, Fatima Abdullahi, Humphries, Matthew P., Bingham, Victoria, James, Jaqueline A., James, Colin R., Paul Harkin, D., Kennedy, Richard D., McIntosh, Stuart A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01599-0
_version_ 1784635405911457792
author Parkes, Eileen E.
Savage, Kienan I.
Lioe, Tong
Boyd, Clinton
Halliday, Sophia
Walker, Steven M.
Lowry, Keith
Knight, Laura
Buckley, Niamh E.
Grogan, Andrena
Logan, Gemma E.
Clayton, Alison
Hurwitz, Jane
Kirk, Stephen J.
Xu, Jiamei
Sidi, Fatima Abdullahi
Humphries, Matthew P.
Bingham, Victoria
James, Jaqueline A.
James, Colin R.
Paul Harkin, D.
Kennedy, Richard D.
McIntosh, Stuart A.
author_facet Parkes, Eileen E.
Savage, Kienan I.
Lioe, Tong
Boyd, Clinton
Halliday, Sophia
Walker, Steven M.
Lowry, Keith
Knight, Laura
Buckley, Niamh E.
Grogan, Andrena
Logan, Gemma E.
Clayton, Alison
Hurwitz, Jane
Kirk, Stephen J.
Xu, Jiamei
Sidi, Fatima Abdullahi
Humphries, Matthew P.
Bingham, Victoria
James, Jaqueline A.
James, Colin R.
Paul Harkin, D.
Kennedy, Richard D.
McIntosh, Stuart A.
author_sort Parkes, Eileen E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The DNA-damage immune-response (DDIR) signature is an immune-driven gene expression signature retrospectively validated as predicting response to anthracycline-based therapy. This feasibility study prospectively evaluates the use of this assay to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in early breast cancer. METHODS: This feasibility study assessed the integration of a novel biomarker into clinical workflows. Tumour samples were collected from patients receiving standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FEC + /−taxane and anti-HER2 therapy as appropriate) at baseline, mid- and post-chemotherapy. Baseline DDIR signature scores were correlated with pathological treatment response. RNA sequencing was used to assess chemotherapy/response-related changes in biologically linked gene signatures. RESULTS: DDIR signature reports were available within 14 days for 97.8% of 46 patients (13 TNBC, 16 HER2 + ve, 27 ER + HER2-ve). Positive scores predicted response to treatment (odds ratio 4.67 for RCB 0-1 disease (95% CI 1.13–15.09, P = 0.032)). DDIR positivity correlated with immune infiltration and upregulated immune-checkpoint gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the DDIR signature as predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy which can be integrated into clinical workflows, potentially identifying a subgroup with high sensitivity to anthracycline chemotherapy. Transcriptomic data suggest induction with anthracycline-containing regimens in immune restricted, “cold” tumours may be effective for immune priming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable (non-interventional study). CRUK Internal Database Number 14232.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87705942022-02-04 Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer Parkes, Eileen E. Savage, Kienan I. Lioe, Tong Boyd, Clinton Halliday, Sophia Walker, Steven M. Lowry, Keith Knight, Laura Buckley, Niamh E. Grogan, Andrena Logan, Gemma E. Clayton, Alison Hurwitz, Jane Kirk, Stephen J. Xu, Jiamei Sidi, Fatima Abdullahi Humphries, Matthew P. Bingham, Victoria James, Jaqueline A. James, Colin R. Paul Harkin, D. Kennedy, Richard D. McIntosh, Stuart A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The DNA-damage immune-response (DDIR) signature is an immune-driven gene expression signature retrospectively validated as predicting response to anthracycline-based therapy. This feasibility study prospectively evaluates the use of this assay to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in early breast cancer. METHODS: This feasibility study assessed the integration of a novel biomarker into clinical workflows. Tumour samples were collected from patients receiving standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FEC + /−taxane and anti-HER2 therapy as appropriate) at baseline, mid- and post-chemotherapy. Baseline DDIR signature scores were correlated with pathological treatment response. RNA sequencing was used to assess chemotherapy/response-related changes in biologically linked gene signatures. RESULTS: DDIR signature reports were available within 14 days for 97.8% of 46 patients (13 TNBC, 16 HER2 + ve, 27 ER + HER2-ve). Positive scores predicted response to treatment (odds ratio 4.67 for RCB 0-1 disease (95% CI 1.13–15.09, P = 0.032)). DDIR positivity correlated with immune infiltration and upregulated immune-checkpoint gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the DDIR signature as predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy which can be integrated into clinical workflows, potentially identifying a subgroup with high sensitivity to anthracycline chemotherapy. Transcriptomic data suggest induction with anthracycline-containing regimens in immune restricted, “cold” tumours may be effective for immune priming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable (non-interventional study). CRUK Internal Database Number 14232. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-02 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8770594/ /pubmed/34728791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01599-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Parkes, Eileen E.
Savage, Kienan I.
Lioe, Tong
Boyd, Clinton
Halliday, Sophia
Walker, Steven M.
Lowry, Keith
Knight, Laura
Buckley, Niamh E.
Grogan, Andrena
Logan, Gemma E.
Clayton, Alison
Hurwitz, Jane
Kirk, Stephen J.
Xu, Jiamei
Sidi, Fatima Abdullahi
Humphries, Matthew P.
Bingham, Victoria
James, Jaqueline A.
James, Colin R.
Paul Harkin, D.
Kennedy, Richard D.
McIntosh, Stuart A.
Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title_full Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title_fullStr Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title_short Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
title_sort activation of a cgas-sting-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01599-0
work_keys_str_mv AT parkeseileene activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT savagekienani activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT lioetong activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT boydclinton activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT hallidaysophia activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT walkerstevenm activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT lowrykeith activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT knightlaura activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT buckleyniamhe activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT groganandrena activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT logangemmae activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT claytonalison activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT hurwitzjane activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT kirkstephenj activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT xujiamei activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT sidifatimaabdullahi activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT humphriesmatthewp activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT binghamvictoria activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT jamesjaquelinea activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT jamescolinr activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT paulharkind activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT kennedyrichardd activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer
AT mcintoshstuarta activationofacgasstingmediatedimmuneresponsepredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinearlybreastcancer