Cargando…

Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project

AIMS: Our first aim was to first find out how confident general practitioners were about referring in to the Gloucester Recovery Team and managing psychotropic medications. Our second aim was to then improve general practitioner's self-rated scores of confidence in managing psychotropic medicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rackley, Emily, King, Rosemary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770756/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.568
_version_ 1784635436013977600
author Rackley, Emily
King, Rosemary
author_facet Rackley, Emily
King, Rosemary
author_sort Rackley, Emily
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Our first aim was to first find out how confident general practitioners were about referring in to the Gloucester Recovery Team and managing psychotropic medications. Our second aim was to then improve general practitioner's self-rated scores of confidence in managing psychotropic medication whilst also improving general practitioner's satisfaction with waiting times for patient's referred to the Gloucester Recovery Team. METHOD: We planned to introduce an email address for GPs to use to seek medication and diagnostic advice for patients known to and not known to the Recovery Team. We initially introduced this for the ‘Team 2’ catchment area consisting of five practices within Gloucester. These were then read and replied to by the Team 2 consultant, Dr Ikram, as appropriate. A further survey was then sent out.. These results provided both quantitative ordinal data through a likert scale, which was then transformed into binomial data, such as those scoring ‘extremely confident’ ‘very confident’ ‘somewhat confident’ vs ‘not so confident’ and ‘not confident at all’ which is then compared using relative risk. RESULT: Our response rate for our initial survey was 8 general practitioners, and for our follow-up survey 1 general practitioner and 2 nurse prescribers. Confidence in continuing psychotropic medications increased from 7 out of the 8 (78%) stating somewhat confident to extremely confident to 3 out of the 3 (100%) after the introduction of the email; a relative change of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.48 p = 0.318). Confidence in initiating psychotropic medications increased from 4 out of the 8 (50%) stating somewhat confident to extremely confident to 2 out of the 3 (66%) after the introduction of the email; a relative change of 1.33 (95% confidence interval 0.46-3.84 p = 0.594). CONCLUSION: Analysing the qualitative data showed the email address was used for a variety of requests and advice including: 1) A capacity assessment, 2) Initiating medications for depression and anxiety, 3) Medications during pregnancy, 4) Medication for those with Intellectual Disability, 5) Switching medication, 6) Medications for poor sleep and 7) Mood stabilising medication. This change appeared to be well received, however the response rate was very low which makes full analysis difficult. We also included nurse practitioners working in primary mental health in our second survey, whereas the initial survey was only sent to GPs. This initiative was also only started for 5 of the GP practices within Gloucester, and there may be a different knowledge base/confidence amongst the other practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87707562022-01-31 Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project Rackley, Emily King, Rosemary BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: Our first aim was to first find out how confident general practitioners were about referring in to the Gloucester Recovery Team and managing psychotropic medications. Our second aim was to then improve general practitioner's self-rated scores of confidence in managing psychotropic medication whilst also improving general practitioner's satisfaction with waiting times for patient's referred to the Gloucester Recovery Team. METHOD: We planned to introduce an email address for GPs to use to seek medication and diagnostic advice for patients known to and not known to the Recovery Team. We initially introduced this for the ‘Team 2’ catchment area consisting of five practices within Gloucester. These were then read and replied to by the Team 2 consultant, Dr Ikram, as appropriate. A further survey was then sent out.. These results provided both quantitative ordinal data through a likert scale, which was then transformed into binomial data, such as those scoring ‘extremely confident’ ‘very confident’ ‘somewhat confident’ vs ‘not so confident’ and ‘not confident at all’ which is then compared using relative risk. RESULT: Our response rate for our initial survey was 8 general practitioners, and for our follow-up survey 1 general practitioner and 2 nurse prescribers. Confidence in continuing psychotropic medications increased from 7 out of the 8 (78%) stating somewhat confident to extremely confident to 3 out of the 3 (100%) after the introduction of the email; a relative change of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.48 p = 0.318). Confidence in initiating psychotropic medications increased from 4 out of the 8 (50%) stating somewhat confident to extremely confident to 2 out of the 3 (66%) after the introduction of the email; a relative change of 1.33 (95% confidence interval 0.46-3.84 p = 0.594). CONCLUSION: Analysing the qualitative data showed the email address was used for a variety of requests and advice including: 1) A capacity assessment, 2) Initiating medications for depression and anxiety, 3) Medications during pregnancy, 4) Medication for those with Intellectual Disability, 5) Switching medication, 6) Medications for poor sleep and 7) Mood stabilising medication. This change appeared to be well received, however the response rate was very low which makes full analysis difficult. We also included nurse practitioners working in primary mental health in our second survey, whereas the initial survey was only sent to GPs. This initiative was also only started for 5 of the GP practices within Gloucester, and there may be a different knowledge base/confidence amongst the other practices. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8770756/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.568 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Rackley, Emily
King, Rosemary
Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title_full Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title_fullStr Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title_full_unstemmed Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title_short Remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
title_sort remote psychotropic medication advice for general practitioners: a quality improvement project
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770756/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.568
work_keys_str_mv AT rackleyemily remotepsychotropicmedicationadviceforgeneralpractitionersaqualityimprovementproject
AT kingrosemary remotepsychotropicmedicationadviceforgeneralpractitionersaqualityimprovementproject