Cargando…

Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure

Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goñi, Francisco J., Barton, Keith, Dias, José António, Diestelhorst, Michael, Garcia-Feijoo, Julián, Hommer, Anton, Kodjikian, Laurent, Nicolò, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00427-1
_version_ 1784635443595182080
author Goñi, Francisco J.
Barton, Keith
Dias, José António
Diestelhorst, Michael
Garcia-Feijoo, Julián
Hommer, Anton
Kodjikian, Laurent
Nicolò, Massimo
author_facet Goñi, Francisco J.
Barton, Keith
Dias, José António
Diestelhorst, Michael
Garcia-Feijoo, Julián
Hommer, Anton
Kodjikian, Laurent
Nicolò, Massimo
author_sort Goñi, Francisco J.
collection PubMed
description Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitoring is rigorous enough to detect and resolve any potential problems at the earliest opportunity without it also being overburdensome for patients who have the lowest risk of developing an IOP rise. We have developed dynamic algorithms that: (1) tailor the frequency and extent of monitoring according to individual susceptibility and current IOP and (2) assist retina specialists in deciding when they should consider a referral to a glaucoma specialist. One algorithm is for patients with a relatively low susceptibility to developing an IOP rise (those whose baseline IOP is < 22 mmHg and who do not have a history of IOP events). Depending on their first post-implantation IOP check, the algorithm classifies them as: low risk if IOP remains < 22 mmHg; medium risk if IOP is 22–25 mmHg and any rise from baseline is < 10 mmHg; or high risk if IOP is > 25 mmHg or any rise from baseline is ≥ 10 mmHg. Thereafter, the algorithm guides on the frequency and extent of monitoring required in each of these groups and, if IOP rises or falls during treatment, patients may move up or down the risk groups accordingly. A different algorithm is provided for patients who are more susceptible to developing an IOP rise (those with a baseline IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg or a prior history of an IOP event). These patients need monitoring more closely so this algorithm has only medium- or high-risk classifications. These algorithms update the previous monitoring guidance by Goñi et al. (Goñi et al. in Ophthalmol Ther 5:47–61, 2016). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8770785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87707852022-02-02 Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure Goñi, Francisco J. Barton, Keith Dias, José António Diestelhorst, Michael Garcia-Feijoo, Julián Hommer, Anton Kodjikian, Laurent Nicolò, Massimo Ophthalmol Ther Commentary Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitoring is rigorous enough to detect and resolve any potential problems at the earliest opportunity without it also being overburdensome for patients who have the lowest risk of developing an IOP rise. We have developed dynamic algorithms that: (1) tailor the frequency and extent of monitoring according to individual susceptibility and current IOP and (2) assist retina specialists in deciding when they should consider a referral to a glaucoma specialist. One algorithm is for patients with a relatively low susceptibility to developing an IOP rise (those whose baseline IOP is < 22 mmHg and who do not have a history of IOP events). Depending on their first post-implantation IOP check, the algorithm classifies them as: low risk if IOP remains < 22 mmHg; medium risk if IOP is 22–25 mmHg and any rise from baseline is < 10 mmHg; or high risk if IOP is > 25 mmHg or any rise from baseline is ≥ 10 mmHg. Thereafter, the algorithm guides on the frequency and extent of monitoring required in each of these groups and, if IOP rises or falls during treatment, patients may move up or down the risk groups accordingly. A different algorithm is provided for patients who are more susceptible to developing an IOP rise (those with a baseline IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg or a prior history of an IOP event). These patients need monitoring more closely so this algorithm has only medium- or high-risk classifications. These algorithms update the previous monitoring guidance by Goñi et al. (Goñi et al. in Ophthalmol Ther 5:47–61, 2016). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Healthcare 2022-01-05 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8770785/ /pubmed/34993882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00427-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Commentary
Goñi, Francisco J.
Barton, Keith
Dias, José António
Diestelhorst, Michael
Garcia-Feijoo, Julián
Hommer, Anton
Kodjikian, Laurent
Nicolò, Massimo
Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title_full Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title_fullStr Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title_short Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure
title_sort intravitreal corticosteroid implantation in diabetic macular edema: updated european consensus guidance on monitoring and managing intraocular pressure
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00427-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gonifranciscoj intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT bartonkeith intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT diasjoseantonio intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT diestelhorstmichael intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT garciafeijoojulian intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT hommeranton intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT kodjikianlaurent intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure
AT nicolomassimo intravitrealcorticosteroidimplantationindiabeticmacularedemaupdatedeuropeanconsensusguidanceonmonitoringandmanagingintraocularpressure