Cargando…
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21 |
_version_ | 1784635518425759744 |
---|---|
author | Kubihal, Vijay Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Rakesh Seth, Amlesh Kumar, Rajeev Kaushal, Seema Sarangi, Jayati Gupta, Ravikant Das, Chandan Jyoti |
author_facet | Kubihal, Vijay Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Rakesh Seth, Amlesh Kumar, Rajeev Kaushal, Seema Sarangi, Jayati Gupta, Ravikant Das, Chandan Jyoti |
author_sort | Kubihal, Vijay |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx rate contrast, K(ep) – efflux rate constant, ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient, and SUVmax ratio – prostate SUVmax to background SUVmax ratio) in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk group patients (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/ml). METHODOLOGY: The study included thirty-three consecutive adult men with serum prostate specific antigen >10ng/ml, and systematic 12 core prostate biopsy proven prostate cancer. All the 33 patients, were evaluated with mpMRI, and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT. The biopsy specimens and imaging were evaluated for 12 sectors per prostate by a predetermined scheme. RESULTS: MpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score ≥3 showed higher sensitivity than (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (96.3% vs. 82.4%), with similar specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). Combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in parallel increased sensitivity (99.5%) and NPV (98.7%) for detection of CSPCa and combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in series increased specificity (71.8%) and PPV (71.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). ADC showed a strong negative correlation with Gleason score (r = −0.77), and the highest discriminative ability for detection and localization of CSPCa (area under curve [AUC]: 0.91), followed by K(trans) (r = 0.74; AUC: 0.89), PI-RADS (0.73; 0.86), SUVmax ratio (0.49; 0.74), and K(ep) (0.24; 0.66). CONCLUSION: MpMRI PI-RADS v2 score and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (individually as well as in combination) are reliable tool for detection and localization of CSPCa. Quantitative MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT parameters have potential to predict Gleason score and detect CSPCa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8771078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87710782022-02-03 Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study Kubihal, Vijay Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Rakesh Seth, Amlesh Kumar, Rajeev Kaushal, Seema Sarangi, Jayati Gupta, Ravikant Das, Chandan Jyoti Indian J Nucl Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx rate contrast, K(ep) – efflux rate constant, ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient, and SUVmax ratio – prostate SUVmax to background SUVmax ratio) in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk group patients (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/ml). METHODOLOGY: The study included thirty-three consecutive adult men with serum prostate specific antigen >10ng/ml, and systematic 12 core prostate biopsy proven prostate cancer. All the 33 patients, were evaluated with mpMRI, and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT. The biopsy specimens and imaging were evaluated for 12 sectors per prostate by a predetermined scheme. RESULTS: MpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score ≥3 showed higher sensitivity than (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (96.3% vs. 82.4%), with similar specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). Combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in parallel increased sensitivity (99.5%) and NPV (98.7%) for detection of CSPCa and combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in series increased specificity (71.8%) and PPV (71.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). ADC showed a strong negative correlation with Gleason score (r = −0.77), and the highest discriminative ability for detection and localization of CSPCa (area under curve [AUC]: 0.91), followed by K(trans) (r = 0.74; AUC: 0.89), PI-RADS (0.73; 0.86), SUVmax ratio (0.49; 0.74), and K(ep) (0.24; 0.66). CONCLUSION: MpMRI PI-RADS v2 score and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (individually as well as in combination) are reliable tool for detection and localization of CSPCa. Quantitative MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT parameters have potential to predict Gleason score and detect CSPCa. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8771078/ /pubmed/35125753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kubihal, Vijay Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Rakesh Seth, Amlesh Kumar, Rajeev Kaushal, Seema Sarangi, Jayati Gupta, Ravikant Das, Chandan Jyoti Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title_full | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title_fullStr | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title_short | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study |
title_sort | multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, (68)ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography, and respective quantitative parameters in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer in intermediate- and high-risk group patients: an indian demographic study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubihalvijay multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT sharmasanjay multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT kumarrakesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT sethamlesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT kumarrajeev multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT kaushalseema multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT sarangijayati multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT guptaravikant multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa AT daschandanjyoti multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa |