Cargando…

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubihal, Vijay, Sharma, Sanjay, Kumar, Rakesh, Seth, Amlesh, Kumar, Rajeev, Kaushal, Seema, Sarangi, Jayati, Gupta, Ravikant, Das, Chandan Jyoti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21
_version_ 1784635518425759744
author Kubihal, Vijay
Sharma, Sanjay
Kumar, Rakesh
Seth, Amlesh
Kumar, Rajeev
Kaushal, Seema
Sarangi, Jayati
Gupta, Ravikant
Das, Chandan Jyoti
author_facet Kubihal, Vijay
Sharma, Sanjay
Kumar, Rakesh
Seth, Amlesh
Kumar, Rajeev
Kaushal, Seema
Sarangi, Jayati
Gupta, Ravikant
Das, Chandan Jyoti
author_sort Kubihal, Vijay
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx rate contrast, K(ep) – efflux rate constant, ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient, and SUVmax ratio – prostate SUVmax to background SUVmax ratio) in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk group patients (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/ml). METHODOLOGY: The study included thirty-three consecutive adult men with serum prostate specific antigen >10ng/ml, and systematic 12 core prostate biopsy proven prostate cancer. All the 33 patients, were evaluated with mpMRI, and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT. The biopsy specimens and imaging were evaluated for 12 sectors per prostate by a predetermined scheme. RESULTS: MpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score ≥3 showed higher sensitivity than (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (96.3% vs. 82.4%), with similar specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). Combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in parallel increased sensitivity (99.5%) and NPV (98.7%) for detection of CSPCa and combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in series increased specificity (71.8%) and PPV (71.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). ADC showed a strong negative correlation with Gleason score (r = −0.77), and the highest discriminative ability for detection and localization of CSPCa (area under curve [AUC]: 0.91), followed by K(trans) (r = 0.74; AUC: 0.89), PI-RADS (0.73; 0.86), SUVmax ratio (0.49; 0.74), and K(ep) (0.24; 0.66). CONCLUSION: MpMRI PI-RADS v2 score and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (individually as well as in combination) are reliable tool for detection and localization of CSPCa. Quantitative MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT parameters have potential to predict Gleason score and detect CSPCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87710782022-02-03 Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study Kubihal, Vijay Sharma, Sanjay Kumar, Rakesh Seth, Amlesh Kumar, Rajeev Kaushal, Seema Sarangi, Jayati Gupta, Ravikant Das, Chandan Jyoti Indian J Nucl Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and (68)Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (K(trans) – influx rate contrast, K(ep) – efflux rate constant, ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient, and SUVmax ratio – prostate SUVmax to background SUVmax ratio) in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk group patients (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/ml). METHODOLOGY: The study included thirty-three consecutive adult men with serum prostate specific antigen >10ng/ml, and systematic 12 core prostate biopsy proven prostate cancer. All the 33 patients, were evaluated with mpMRI, and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT. The biopsy specimens and imaging were evaluated for 12 sectors per prostate by a predetermined scheme. RESULTS: MpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score ≥3 showed higher sensitivity than (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (96.3% vs. 82.4%), with similar specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). Combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in parallel increased sensitivity (99.5%) and NPV (98.7%) for detection of CSPCa and combined use of MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT in series increased specificity (71.8%) and PPV (71.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). ADC showed a strong negative correlation with Gleason score (r = −0.77), and the highest discriminative ability for detection and localization of CSPCa (area under curve [AUC]: 0.91), followed by K(trans) (r = 0.74; AUC: 0.89), PI-RADS (0.73; 0.86), SUVmax ratio (0.49; 0.74), and K(ep) (0.24; 0.66). CONCLUSION: MpMRI PI-RADS v2 score and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT (individually as well as in combination) are reliable tool for detection and localization of CSPCa. Quantitative MRI and (68)Ga PSMA PET-CT parameters have potential to predict Gleason score and detect CSPCa. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8771078/ /pubmed/35125753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kubihal, Vijay
Sharma, Sanjay
Kumar, Rakesh
Seth, Amlesh
Kumar, Rajeev
Kaushal, Seema
Sarangi, Jayati
Gupta, Ravikant
Das, Chandan Jyoti
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title_full Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title_fullStr Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title_short Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, (68)Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study
title_sort multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, (68)ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography, and respective quantitative parameters in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer in intermediate- and high-risk group patients: an indian demographic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_80_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kubihalvijay multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT sharmasanjay multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT kumarrakesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT sethamlesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT kumarrajeev multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT kaushalseema multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT sarangijayati multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT guptaravikant multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa
AT daschandanjyoti multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging68gaprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandrespectivequantitativeparametersindetectionandlocalizationofclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinintermediateandhighriskgrouppatientsa