Cargando…

Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries

OBJECTIVE: To provide experience for formulating prevention and control policies, this study analyzed the effectiveness of the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) prevention and control policies, and evaluated health equity and epidemic cooperation among BRICS countries. METHODS: This study summarize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiao, Jun, Shi, Leiyu, Zhang, Yuyao, Chen, Haiqian, Wang, Xiaohan, Yang, Manfei, Yang, Junyan, Liu, Meiheng, Sun, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35057810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z
_version_ 1784635546310541312
author Jiao, Jun
Shi, Leiyu
Zhang, Yuyao
Chen, Haiqian
Wang, Xiaohan
Yang, Manfei
Yang, Junyan
Liu, Meiheng
Sun, Gang
author_facet Jiao, Jun
Shi, Leiyu
Zhang, Yuyao
Chen, Haiqian
Wang, Xiaohan
Yang, Manfei
Yang, Junyan
Liu, Meiheng
Sun, Gang
author_sort Jiao, Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide experience for formulating prevention and control policies, this study analyzed the effectiveness of the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) prevention and control policies, and evaluated health equity and epidemic cooperation among BRICS countries. METHODS: This study summarized the pandemic prevention and control policies in BRICS countries and evaluated the effectiveness of those policies by extracting COVID-19 related data from official websites. RESULT: As of May 4, 2021, responding to COVID-19. China adopted containment strategies. China’s total confirmed cases (102,560) were stable, without a second pandemic peak, and the total deaths per million (3.37) were much lower than others. India and South Africa who adopted intermediate strategies have similar pandemic curves, total confirmed cases in India (20,664,979) surpassed South Africa (1,586,148) as the highest in five countries, but total deaths per million (163.90) lower than South Africa (919.11). Brazil and Russia adopted mitigation strategies. Total confirmed cases in Brazil (14,856,888) and Russia (4,784,497) continued to increase, and Brazil’s total deaths per million (1,936.34) is higher than Russia (751.50) and other countries. CONCLUSION: This study shows BRICS countries implemented different epidemic interventions. Containment strategy is more effective than intermediate strategy and mitigation strategy in limiting the spread of COVID-19. Especially when a strict containment strategy is implemented in an early stage, but premature relaxation of restrictions may lead to rebounding. It is a good choice to combat COVID-19 by improving the inclusiveness of intervention policies, deepening BRICS epidemic cooperation, and increasing health equities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87711922022-01-20 Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries Jiao, Jun Shi, Leiyu Zhang, Yuyao Chen, Haiqian Wang, Xiaohan Yang, Manfei Yang, Junyan Liu, Meiheng Sun, Gang Int J Equity Health Research OBJECTIVE: To provide experience for formulating prevention and control policies, this study analyzed the effectiveness of the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) prevention and control policies, and evaluated health equity and epidemic cooperation among BRICS countries. METHODS: This study summarized the pandemic prevention and control policies in BRICS countries and evaluated the effectiveness of those policies by extracting COVID-19 related data from official websites. RESULT: As of May 4, 2021, responding to COVID-19. China adopted containment strategies. China’s total confirmed cases (102,560) were stable, without a second pandemic peak, and the total deaths per million (3.37) were much lower than others. India and South Africa who adopted intermediate strategies have similar pandemic curves, total confirmed cases in India (20,664,979) surpassed South Africa (1,586,148) as the highest in five countries, but total deaths per million (163.90) lower than South Africa (919.11). Brazil and Russia adopted mitigation strategies. Total confirmed cases in Brazil (14,856,888) and Russia (4,784,497) continued to increase, and Brazil’s total deaths per million (1,936.34) is higher than Russia (751.50) and other countries. CONCLUSION: This study shows BRICS countries implemented different epidemic interventions. Containment strategy is more effective than intermediate strategy and mitigation strategy in limiting the spread of COVID-19. Especially when a strict containment strategy is implemented in an early stage, but premature relaxation of restrictions may lead to rebounding. It is a good choice to combat COVID-19 by improving the inclusiveness of intervention policies, deepening BRICS epidemic cooperation, and increasing health equities. BioMed Central 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8771192/ /pubmed/35057810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jiao, Jun
Shi, Leiyu
Zhang, Yuyao
Chen, Haiqian
Wang, Xiaohan
Yang, Manfei
Yang, Junyan
Liu, Meiheng
Sun, Gang
Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title_full Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title_fullStr Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title_full_unstemmed Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title_short Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries
title_sort core policies disparity response to covid-19 among brics countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35057810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaojun corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT shileiyu corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT zhangyuyao corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT chenhaiqian corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT wangxiaohan corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT yangmanfei corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT yangjunyan corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT liumeiheng corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries
AT sungang corepoliciesdisparityresponsetocovid19amongbricscountries