Cargando…

Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England

IMPORTANCE: Dentists in the United States are under pressure from orthopedic surgeons and their patients with prosthetic joints to provide antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures (IDP) to reduce the risk of late prosthetic joint infection (LPJI). This has been a common practice for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornhill, Martin H., Crum, Annabel, Rex, Saleema, Stone, Tony, Campbell, Richard, Bradburn, Mike, Fibisan, Veronica, Lockhart, Peter B., Springer, Bryan, Baddour, Larry M., Nicholl, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42987
_version_ 1784635571627360256
author Thornhill, Martin H.
Crum, Annabel
Rex, Saleema
Stone, Tony
Campbell, Richard
Bradburn, Mike
Fibisan, Veronica
Lockhart, Peter B.
Springer, Bryan
Baddour, Larry M.
Nicholl, Jon
author_facet Thornhill, Martin H.
Crum, Annabel
Rex, Saleema
Stone, Tony
Campbell, Richard
Bradburn, Mike
Fibisan, Veronica
Lockhart, Peter B.
Springer, Bryan
Baddour, Larry M.
Nicholl, Jon
author_sort Thornhill, Martin H.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Dentists in the United States are under pressure from orthopedic surgeons and their patients with prosthetic joints to provide antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures (IDP) to reduce the risk of late prosthetic joint infection (LPJI). This has been a common practice for decades, despite a lack of evidence for an association between IDP and LPJI, a lack of evidence of antibiotic prophylaxis efficacy, cost of providing antibiotic prophylaxis, and risk of both adverse drug reactions and the potential for promoting antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE: To quantify any temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a case-crossover and time trend design to examine any potential association between IDP and LPJI. The population of England (55 million) was chosen because antibiotic prophylaxis has never been recommended to prevent LPJI in England, and any association between IDP and LPJI would therefore be fully exposed. All patients admitted to hospitals in England for LPJI from December 25, 2011, through March 31, 2017, and for whom dental records were available were included. Analyses were performed between May 2018 and June 2021. EXPOSURES: Exposure to IDP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the incidence of IDP in the 3 months before LPJI hospital admission (case period) compared with the incidence in the 12 months before that (control period). RESULTS: A total of 9427 LPJI hospital admissions with dental records (mean [SD] patient age, 67.8 [13.1] years) were identified, including 4897 (52.0%) men and 4529 (48.0%) women. Of these, 2385 (25.3%) had hip prosthetic joints, 3168 (33.6%) had knee prosthetic joints, 259 (2.8%) had other prosthetic joints, and 3615 (38.4%) had unknown prosthetic joint types. There was no significant temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. Indeed, there was a lower incidence of IDP in the 3 months prior to LPJI (incidence rate ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that there is no rationale to administer antibiotic prophylaxis before IDP in patients with prosthetic joints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87713002022-02-04 Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England Thornhill, Martin H. Crum, Annabel Rex, Saleema Stone, Tony Campbell, Richard Bradburn, Mike Fibisan, Veronica Lockhart, Peter B. Springer, Bryan Baddour, Larry M. Nicholl, Jon JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Dentists in the United States are under pressure from orthopedic surgeons and their patients with prosthetic joints to provide antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures (IDP) to reduce the risk of late prosthetic joint infection (LPJI). This has been a common practice for decades, despite a lack of evidence for an association between IDP and LPJI, a lack of evidence of antibiotic prophylaxis efficacy, cost of providing antibiotic prophylaxis, and risk of both adverse drug reactions and the potential for promoting antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE: To quantify any temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a case-crossover and time trend design to examine any potential association between IDP and LPJI. The population of England (55 million) was chosen because antibiotic prophylaxis has never been recommended to prevent LPJI in England, and any association between IDP and LPJI would therefore be fully exposed. All patients admitted to hospitals in England for LPJI from December 25, 2011, through March 31, 2017, and for whom dental records were available were included. Analyses were performed between May 2018 and June 2021. EXPOSURES: Exposure to IDP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the incidence of IDP in the 3 months before LPJI hospital admission (case period) compared with the incidence in the 12 months before that (control period). RESULTS: A total of 9427 LPJI hospital admissions with dental records (mean [SD] patient age, 67.8 [13.1] years) were identified, including 4897 (52.0%) men and 4529 (48.0%) women. Of these, 2385 (25.3%) had hip prosthetic joints, 3168 (33.6%) had knee prosthetic joints, 259 (2.8%) had other prosthetic joints, and 3615 (38.4%) had unknown prosthetic joint types. There was no significant temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. Indeed, there was a lower incidence of IDP in the 3 months prior to LPJI (incidence rate ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that there is no rationale to administer antibiotic prophylaxis before IDP in patients with prosthetic joints. American Medical Association 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8771300/ /pubmed/35044470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42987 Text en Copyright 2022 Thornhill MH et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Thornhill, Martin H.
Crum, Annabel
Rex, Saleema
Stone, Tony
Campbell, Richard
Bradburn, Mike
Fibisan, Veronica
Lockhart, Peter B.
Springer, Bryan
Baddour, Larry M.
Nicholl, Jon
Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title_full Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title_fullStr Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title_short Analysis of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Invasive Dental Procedures in England
title_sort analysis of prosthetic joint infections following invasive dental procedures in england
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42987
work_keys_str_mv AT thornhillmartinh analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT crumannabel analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT rexsaleema analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT stonetony analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT campbellrichard analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT bradburnmike analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT fibisanveronica analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT lockhartpeterb analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT springerbryan analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT baddourlarrym analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland
AT nicholljon analysisofprostheticjointinfectionsfollowinginvasivedentalproceduresinengland