Cargando…

Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety

AIMS: Healthcare triage for those subject to section 136 powers (MHA 1983/2007) remains challenging. Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust opened a dedicated Health-Based Place of Safety (HBPOS) in 2020, situated separately from an emergency department (ED). There was concern that this may lead...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berry, Alex, Dalton, Florence, Dunning, Michael, Johansson, Freddie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771440/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.81
_version_ 1784635604496023552
author Berry, Alex
Dalton, Florence
Dunning, Michael
Johansson, Freddie
author_facet Berry, Alex
Dalton, Florence
Dunning, Michael
Johansson, Freddie
author_sort Berry, Alex
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Healthcare triage for those subject to section 136 powers (MHA 1983/2007) remains challenging. Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust opened a dedicated Health-Based Place of Safety (HBPOS) in 2020, situated separately from an emergency department (ED). There was concern that this may lead to physical health problems going unrecognised. We aimed to design a simple, efficient algorithm to be used by non-medically-trained staff to identify those who are subject to s.136 powers who would benefit from medical clearance before being admitted to the HBPOS METHOD: We chaired a consensus meeting with nursing staff, police and emergency medicine consultants when designing the algorithm. Case notes of those presenting under s.136 to the POS over 1 calendar-month in 2019 were reviewed, and the proportion of those who the algorithm would have diverted for medical clearance was calculated. We then reviewed the proportion of cases sent for medical clearance during a single calendar month in 2020, after the HBPOS had opened, to see whether there was a significant difference. RESULT: 37 patients were admitted to the ED-based POS in July 2019, of which 36 records were analysed. 9 patients (25%) were referred for medical clearance, with 2 (6%) requiring medical admission. 8.6% were identified as needing medical clearance when the algorithm was applied retrospectively (positive predictive value 66%, negative predictive value = 79%). Review of records over 1 calendar-month after the HBPOS was established showed 30.6% of patients had been diverted for medical clearance prior to entering the HBPOS. Of the 65 patients, 1 (2%) required transfer to ED within 48 hours of entry. No statistical difference in the proportion of patients sent for medical clearance was observed since the formation of the HBPOS away from the ED (Chi-squared = 0.549, p = 0.458), suggesting the algorithm successfully identified those patients who needed medical clearance prior to admission. We observed high rates of intoxication amongst those admitted (30–40%). CONCLUSION: The algorithm showed high specificity and negative predictive value, allowing for a degree of confidence when admitting those deemed at low-risk of physical deterioration, though it does not eliminate the need for clinical judgement. Interpretation of the results is complicated by the COVID19 pandemic in 2020, which was not accounted for in the algorithm, which possibly led to deviations from the algorithm in real-world clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87714402022-01-31 Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety Berry, Alex Dalton, Florence Dunning, Michael Johansson, Freddie BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations AIMS: Healthcare triage for those subject to section 136 powers (MHA 1983/2007) remains challenging. Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust opened a dedicated Health-Based Place of Safety (HBPOS) in 2020, situated separately from an emergency department (ED). There was concern that this may lead to physical health problems going unrecognised. We aimed to design a simple, efficient algorithm to be used by non-medically-trained staff to identify those who are subject to s.136 powers who would benefit from medical clearance before being admitted to the HBPOS METHOD: We chaired a consensus meeting with nursing staff, police and emergency medicine consultants when designing the algorithm. Case notes of those presenting under s.136 to the POS over 1 calendar-month in 2019 were reviewed, and the proportion of those who the algorithm would have diverted for medical clearance was calculated. We then reviewed the proportion of cases sent for medical clearance during a single calendar month in 2020, after the HBPOS had opened, to see whether there was a significant difference. RESULT: 37 patients were admitted to the ED-based POS in July 2019, of which 36 records were analysed. 9 patients (25%) were referred for medical clearance, with 2 (6%) requiring medical admission. 8.6% were identified as needing medical clearance when the algorithm was applied retrospectively (positive predictive value 66%, negative predictive value = 79%). Review of records over 1 calendar-month after the HBPOS was established showed 30.6% of patients had been diverted for medical clearance prior to entering the HBPOS. Of the 65 patients, 1 (2%) required transfer to ED within 48 hours of entry. No statistical difference in the proportion of patients sent for medical clearance was observed since the formation of the HBPOS away from the ED (Chi-squared = 0.549, p = 0.458), suggesting the algorithm successfully identified those patients who needed medical clearance prior to admission. We observed high rates of intoxication amongst those admitted (30–40%). CONCLUSION: The algorithm showed high specificity and negative predictive value, allowing for a degree of confidence when admitting those deemed at low-risk of physical deterioration, though it does not eliminate the need for clinical judgement. Interpretation of the results is complicated by the COVID19 pandemic in 2020, which was not accounted for in the algorithm, which possibly led to deviations from the algorithm in real-world clinical practice. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8771440/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.81 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
Berry, Alex
Dalton, Florence
Dunning, Michael
Johansson, Freddie
Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title_full Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title_fullStr Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title_full_unstemmed Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title_short Predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
title_sort predicting risks of physical health deterioration in a place of safety
topic Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771440/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.81
work_keys_str_mv AT berryalex predictingrisksofphysicalhealthdeteriorationinaplaceofsafety
AT daltonflorence predictingrisksofphysicalhealthdeteriorationinaplaceofsafety
AT dunningmichael predictingrisksofphysicalhealthdeteriorationinaplaceofsafety
AT johanssonfreddie predictingrisksofphysicalhealthdeteriorationinaplaceofsafety