Cargando…

Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service

AIMS: Aims included to explore how, within a London trust, staff at the interface between patients, relatives and access to services view their understanding of confidentiality, and to determine ways to improve knowledge if needed. BACKGROUND: Confidentiality is essential to the trust and developmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Rhianne, Congdon, Lawrence, Habel, Sheva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771500/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.599
_version_ 1784635616219103232
author Thomas, Rhianne
Congdon, Lawrence
Habel, Sheva
author_facet Thomas, Rhianne
Congdon, Lawrence
Habel, Sheva
author_sort Thomas, Rhianne
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Aims included to explore how, within a London trust, staff at the interface between patients, relatives and access to services view their understanding of confidentiality, and to determine ways to improve knowledge if needed. BACKGROUND: Confidentiality is essential to the trust and development of clinician-patient relationships. National policies set guidance on how confidential information should be recorded, secured and shared. However, confidentiality breaches are reportedly common within health professions. Working with adolescent patient groups brings additional issues regarding confidentiality. Care-givers who contact services, often desiring containment, may experience a sense of uncertainty when confidentiality policy prevents details being shared about a young person's clinical experience. METHOD: Stakeholders were identified from the multidisciplinary team, with a collaborative rather than ‘top-down’ approach. Administrators in patient-facing roles were surveyed to ascertain current understanding and frequency of involvement in confidentiality issues. Based on feedback, a flowchart prompt was designed, ensuring it reflected best practice. Qualitative and quantitive data were collected before and after a two month implementation period. RESULT: All respondents (n = 10) dealt with confidentiality issues at work, with 50% experiencing issues daily. 33% respondents did not feel confident dealing with confidentiality queries at work. The majority (60%) had received confidentiality training, but all respondents thought extra information would be useful. Of possible interventions, 70% supported a flowchart. Following an implementation period, 100% respondents re-surveyed agreed they felt confident dealing with issues related to confidentiality at work. The majority of respondents had used the flowchart and found it useful (83%). Qualitative data gathered suggested rolling-out the project elsewhere. CONCLUSION: A lack of confidence surrounding issues with confidentiality, including information sharing, was identified. This can negatively impact patient engagement and delivery of care. The introduction of the confidentiality flowchart demonstrated improved understanding of, and confidence in, patient confidentiality issues. The small sample size means there are limitations in extrapolating findings to wider contexts. However, it is likely that more confidentiality training and practical information for NHS staff at the interface between patients, clinicians and services would reduce the risk of confidentiality breaches and reinforce positive relationships with services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87715002022-01-31 Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service Thomas, Rhianne Congdon, Lawrence Habel, Sheva BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: Aims included to explore how, within a London trust, staff at the interface between patients, relatives and access to services view their understanding of confidentiality, and to determine ways to improve knowledge if needed. BACKGROUND: Confidentiality is essential to the trust and development of clinician-patient relationships. National policies set guidance on how confidential information should be recorded, secured and shared. However, confidentiality breaches are reportedly common within health professions. Working with adolescent patient groups brings additional issues regarding confidentiality. Care-givers who contact services, often desiring containment, may experience a sense of uncertainty when confidentiality policy prevents details being shared about a young person's clinical experience. METHOD: Stakeholders were identified from the multidisciplinary team, with a collaborative rather than ‘top-down’ approach. Administrators in patient-facing roles were surveyed to ascertain current understanding and frequency of involvement in confidentiality issues. Based on feedback, a flowchart prompt was designed, ensuring it reflected best practice. Qualitative and quantitive data were collected before and after a two month implementation period. RESULT: All respondents (n = 10) dealt with confidentiality issues at work, with 50% experiencing issues daily. 33% respondents did not feel confident dealing with confidentiality queries at work. The majority (60%) had received confidentiality training, but all respondents thought extra information would be useful. Of possible interventions, 70% supported a flowchart. Following an implementation period, 100% respondents re-surveyed agreed they felt confident dealing with issues related to confidentiality at work. The majority of respondents had used the flowchart and found it useful (83%). Qualitative data gathered suggested rolling-out the project elsewhere. CONCLUSION: A lack of confidence surrounding issues with confidentiality, including information sharing, was identified. This can negatively impact patient engagement and delivery of care. The introduction of the confidentiality flowchart demonstrated improved understanding of, and confidence in, patient confidentiality issues. The small sample size means there are limitations in extrapolating findings to wider contexts. However, it is likely that more confidentiality training and practical information for NHS staff at the interface between patients, clinicians and services would reduce the risk of confidentiality breaches and reinforce positive relationships with services. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8771500/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.599 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Thomas, Rhianne
Congdon, Lawrence
Habel, Sheva
Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title_full Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title_fullStr Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title_full_unstemmed Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title_short Confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
title_sort confidentiality at the interface of an adolescent psychotherapy service
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771500/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.599
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrhianne confidentialityattheinterfaceofanadolescentpsychotherapyservice
AT congdonlawrence confidentialityattheinterfaceofanadolescentpsychotherapyservice
AT habelsheva confidentialityattheinterfaceofanadolescentpsychotherapyservice