Cargando…

A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder

AIMS: To conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of manualised psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and examine the differential efficacy of psychological treatments by treatment type and format. BACKGROUND: Previous meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigby, Jake, Fisher, Peter, Cherry, Gemma, Stuart, Taylor, Temple, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.758
_version_ 1784635638783410176
author Rigby, Jake
Fisher, Peter
Cherry, Gemma
Stuart, Taylor
Temple, James
author_facet Rigby, Jake
Fisher, Peter
Cherry, Gemma
Stuart, Taylor
Temple, James
author_sort Rigby, Jake
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of manualised psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and examine the differential efficacy of psychological treatments by treatment type and format. BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses conclude that efficacious psychological treatments for OCD exist. However, determining the efficacy of psychological treatments requires multiple forms of assessment across a range of indexes, yet most previous meta-analyses in OCD are based solely on effect sizes. METHOD: We evaluated treatment efficacy across 24 RCTs (n = 1,667) by conducting clinical significance analyses (using standardised Jacobson methodology) and standardised mean difference within-group effect-size analyses. Outcomes were Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores, evaluated at post-treatment and follow-up (3-6 months post-treatment). RESULT: Post-treatment, there was a large significant within-group effect size for treated patients (g = 1.28) and a small significant effect size for controls (g = 0.30). At follow-up, large within-group effect sizes were found for both treated patients (g = 1.45) and controls (g = 0.90). Clinical significance analyses indicated that treated patients were significantly more likely than controls to recover following an intervention, but recovery rates were low; post-intervention, only 32% of treated patients and 3% of controls recovered; rising to 38% and 21% respectively at follow-up. Regardless of allocation, only approximately 20% of patients were asymptomatic at follow-up. Across the different analysis methods, individual cognitive therapy (CT) was the most effective intervention, followed by group CT plus exposure and response prevention. Self-help interventions were generally less effective. CONCLUSION: Reliance on aggregated within-group effect sizes may lead to overestimation of the efficacy of psychological treatments for OCD. More research is needed to determine the most effective treatment type and format for patients with OCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87715882022-01-31 A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder Rigby, Jake Fisher, Peter Cherry, Gemma Stuart, Taylor Temple, James BJPsych Open Research AIMS: To conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of manualised psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and examine the differential efficacy of psychological treatments by treatment type and format. BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses conclude that efficacious psychological treatments for OCD exist. However, determining the efficacy of psychological treatments requires multiple forms of assessment across a range of indexes, yet most previous meta-analyses in OCD are based solely on effect sizes. METHOD: We evaluated treatment efficacy across 24 RCTs (n = 1,667) by conducting clinical significance analyses (using standardised Jacobson methodology) and standardised mean difference within-group effect-size analyses. Outcomes were Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores, evaluated at post-treatment and follow-up (3-6 months post-treatment). RESULT: Post-treatment, there was a large significant within-group effect size for treated patients (g = 1.28) and a small significant effect size for controls (g = 0.30). At follow-up, large within-group effect sizes were found for both treated patients (g = 1.45) and controls (g = 0.90). Clinical significance analyses indicated that treated patients were significantly more likely than controls to recover following an intervention, but recovery rates were low; post-intervention, only 32% of treated patients and 3% of controls recovered; rising to 38% and 21% respectively at follow-up. Regardless of allocation, only approximately 20% of patients were asymptomatic at follow-up. Across the different analysis methods, individual cognitive therapy (CT) was the most effective intervention, followed by group CT plus exposure and response prevention. Self-help interventions were generally less effective. CONCLUSION: Reliance on aggregated within-group effect sizes may lead to overestimation of the efficacy of psychological treatments for OCD. More research is needed to determine the most effective treatment type and format for patients with OCD. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8771588/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.758 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rigby, Jake
Fisher, Peter
Cherry, Gemma
Stuart, Taylor
Temple, James
A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_full A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_fullStr A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_full_unstemmed A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_short A clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
title_sort clinical significance analysis of manualised psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.758
work_keys_str_mv AT rigbyjake aclinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT fisherpeter aclinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT cherrygemma aclinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT stuarttaylor aclinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT templejames aclinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT rigbyjake clinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT fisherpeter clinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT cherrygemma clinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT stuarttaylor clinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT templejames clinicalsignificanceanalysisofmanualisedpsychologicalinterventionsforobsessivecompulsivedisorder