Cargando…

Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak

AIMS: To compare the usage of remote consultations before and after the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and explore mental health workers’ views on the usage of telemedicine. METHOD: An online questionnaire survey was developed, and disseminated to mental healthcare professionals via e-mail an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khodabux, Nusra, Gangadharan, Satheesh, Tromans, Samuel, Hiremath, Avinash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.704
_version_ 1784635685109497856
author Khodabux, Nusra
Gangadharan, Satheesh
Tromans, Samuel
Hiremath, Avinash
author_facet Khodabux, Nusra
Gangadharan, Satheesh
Tromans, Samuel
Hiremath, Avinash
author_sort Khodabux, Nusra
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the usage of remote consultations before and after the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and explore mental health workers’ views on the usage of telemedicine. METHOD: An online questionnaire survey was developed, and disseminated to mental healthcare professionals via e-mail and social media. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six step procedure for thematic analysis.1 RESULT: There were 40 responses from mental healthcare professionals of varying grades from different sub-specialties, predominantly from the UK. Compared to before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, there was an increase in usage of telephone (9(22.5% to (29)72.5%) and video consultations (4(10%) to 17(42.5%)). Respondents reported an increase in virtual MDTs (35(87.5%) during the pandemic, 9(22.5%) pre-pandemic). Based on a 5-point Likert scale, the mean technical quality of telephone consultations was 3.56/5 (Range 2-5), with 75% rating telephone consultations as not being as good as face-to-face consultations. The mean technical quality of video consultations was 3.58/5 (Range 2-5), with 63% rating video consultations as not being as good as face-to-face consultations. 25 (62.5%) respondents felt comfortable using telephone consultations during the pandemic, 20(50%) felt comfortable using video consultations. Recurring themes identified from the qualitative data regarding reasons for the technical quality ratings were: connection issues, poor infrastructure and security concerns. Nine (23%) respondents felt that using video conferencing consultations had a detrimental impact on the mental health of patients while 14(35%) felt that telephone consultations had a detrimental impact on patients’ mental health. Recurring themes for health practitioners’ perceived effect of the use of telemedicine on patients’ mental heath were the loss of personal touch and reduced patient engagement. CONCLUSION: There was a substantial increase in usage of remote consultations during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among mental healthcare professionals. The results reported in the present study suggest there are numerous barriers to the use of telemedicine in psychiatry, which require future exploration, ideally through interview or ethnographic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87717642022-01-31 Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak Khodabux, Nusra Gangadharan, Satheesh Tromans, Samuel Hiremath, Avinash BJPsych Open Research AIMS: To compare the usage of remote consultations before and after the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and explore mental health workers’ views on the usage of telemedicine. METHOD: An online questionnaire survey was developed, and disseminated to mental healthcare professionals via e-mail and social media. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six step procedure for thematic analysis.1 RESULT: There were 40 responses from mental healthcare professionals of varying grades from different sub-specialties, predominantly from the UK. Compared to before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, there was an increase in usage of telephone (9(22.5% to (29)72.5%) and video consultations (4(10%) to 17(42.5%)). Respondents reported an increase in virtual MDTs (35(87.5%) during the pandemic, 9(22.5%) pre-pandemic). Based on a 5-point Likert scale, the mean technical quality of telephone consultations was 3.56/5 (Range 2-5), with 75% rating telephone consultations as not being as good as face-to-face consultations. The mean technical quality of video consultations was 3.58/5 (Range 2-5), with 63% rating video consultations as not being as good as face-to-face consultations. 25 (62.5%) respondents felt comfortable using telephone consultations during the pandemic, 20(50%) felt comfortable using video consultations. Recurring themes identified from the qualitative data regarding reasons for the technical quality ratings were: connection issues, poor infrastructure and security concerns. Nine (23%) respondents felt that using video conferencing consultations had a detrimental impact on the mental health of patients while 14(35%) felt that telephone consultations had a detrimental impact on patients’ mental health. Recurring themes for health practitioners’ perceived effect of the use of telemedicine on patients’ mental heath were the loss of personal touch and reduced patient engagement. CONCLUSION: There was a substantial increase in usage of remote consultations during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among mental healthcare professionals. The results reported in the present study suggest there are numerous barriers to the use of telemedicine in psychiatry, which require future exploration, ideally through interview or ethnographic studies. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8771764/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.704 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Khodabux, Nusra
Gangadharan, Satheesh
Tromans, Samuel
Hiremath, Avinash
Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title_full Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title_fullStr Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title_short Survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
title_sort survey of remote consultations in psychiatry during the sars-cov-2 outbreak
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771764/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.704
work_keys_str_mv AT khodabuxnusra surveyofremoteconsultationsinpsychiatryduringthesarscov2outbreak
AT gangadharansatheesh surveyofremoteconsultationsinpsychiatryduringthesarscov2outbreak
AT tromanssamuel surveyofremoteconsultationsinpsychiatryduringthesarscov2outbreak
AT hiremathavinash surveyofremoteconsultationsinpsychiatryduringthesarscov2outbreak