Cargando…

Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks

A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Pratap S., Abouhawwash, Mohamed, Almutairi, Abdulwahab, Singh, Rishi Pal, Singh, Yudhvir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111906
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789
_version_ 1784635692145442816
author Malik, Pratap S.
Abouhawwash, Mohamed
Almutairi, Abdulwahab
Singh, Rishi Pal
Singh, Yudhvir
author_facet Malik, Pratap S.
Abouhawwash, Mohamed
Almutairi, Abdulwahab
Singh, Rishi Pal
Singh, Yudhvir
author_sort Malik, Pratap S.
collection PubMed
description A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers from significant challenges attributing to signal absorption by rocks, soil, or water contents, highly varying channel condition caused by soil characteristics, and requirement of big antennas. As a strong alternative of EM, various magnetic induction (MI) techniques have been introduced. These techniques basically depend upon the magnetic induction between two coupled coils associated with transceiver sensor nodes. This paper elaborates on three basic MI communication mechanisms i.e. direct MI transmission, MI waveguide transmission, and 3D coil MI communication with detailed discussion of their working mechanism, advantages and limitations. The comparative analysis of these MI techniques with each other as well as with EM wave method will facilitate the users in choosing the best method to offer enhanced transmission range (upto 250 m), reduced path loss (<100 dB), channel reliability, working bandwidth (1–2 kHz), & omni-directional coverage to realize the promising MI-based wireless underground sensor network (WUSN) applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8771792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87717922022-02-01 Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks Malik, Pratap S. Abouhawwash, Mohamed Almutairi, Abdulwahab Singh, Rishi Pal Singh, Yudhvir PeerJ Comput Sci Computer Networks and Communications A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers from significant challenges attributing to signal absorption by rocks, soil, or water contents, highly varying channel condition caused by soil characteristics, and requirement of big antennas. As a strong alternative of EM, various magnetic induction (MI) techniques have been introduced. These techniques basically depend upon the magnetic induction between two coupled coils associated with transceiver sensor nodes. This paper elaborates on three basic MI communication mechanisms i.e. direct MI transmission, MI waveguide transmission, and 3D coil MI communication with detailed discussion of their working mechanism, advantages and limitations. The comparative analysis of these MI techniques with each other as well as with EM wave method will facilitate the users in choosing the best method to offer enhanced transmission range (upto 250 m), reduced path loss (<100 dB), channel reliability, working bandwidth (1–2 kHz), & omni-directional coverage to realize the promising MI-based wireless underground sensor network (WUSN) applications. PeerJ Inc. 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8771792/ /pubmed/35111906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789 Text en © 2022 Malik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Computer Networks and Communications
Malik, Pratap S.
Abouhawwash, Mohamed
Almutairi, Abdulwahab
Singh, Rishi Pal
Singh, Yudhvir
Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title_full Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title_short Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
title_sort comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
topic Computer Networks and Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111906
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789
work_keys_str_mv AT malikprataps comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks
AT abouhawwashmohamed comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks
AT almutairiabdulwahab comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks
AT singhrishipal comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks
AT singhyudhvir comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks