Cargando…
Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks
A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789 |
_version_ | 1784635692145442816 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Pratap S. Abouhawwash, Mohamed Almutairi, Abdulwahab Singh, Rishi Pal Singh, Yudhvir |
author_facet | Malik, Pratap S. Abouhawwash, Mohamed Almutairi, Abdulwahab Singh, Rishi Pal Singh, Yudhvir |
author_sort | Malik, Pratap S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers from significant challenges attributing to signal absorption by rocks, soil, or water contents, highly varying channel condition caused by soil characteristics, and requirement of big antennas. As a strong alternative of EM, various magnetic induction (MI) techniques have been introduced. These techniques basically depend upon the magnetic induction between two coupled coils associated with transceiver sensor nodes. This paper elaborates on three basic MI communication mechanisms i.e. direct MI transmission, MI waveguide transmission, and 3D coil MI communication with detailed discussion of their working mechanism, advantages and limitations. The comparative analysis of these MI techniques with each other as well as with EM wave method will facilitate the users in choosing the best method to offer enhanced transmission range (upto 250 m), reduced path loss (<100 dB), channel reliability, working bandwidth (1–2 kHz), & omni-directional coverage to realize the promising MI-based wireless underground sensor network (WUSN) applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8771792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87717922022-02-01 Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks Malik, Pratap S. Abouhawwash, Mohamed Almutairi, Abdulwahab Singh, Rishi Pal Singh, Yudhvir PeerJ Comput Sci Computer Networks and Communications A large range of applications have been identified based upon the communication of underground sensors deeply buried in the soil. The classical electromagnetic wave (EM) approach, which works well for terrestrial communication in air medium, when applied for this underground communication, suffers from significant challenges attributing to signal absorption by rocks, soil, or water contents, highly varying channel condition caused by soil characteristics, and requirement of big antennas. As a strong alternative of EM, various magnetic induction (MI) techniques have been introduced. These techniques basically depend upon the magnetic induction between two coupled coils associated with transceiver sensor nodes. This paper elaborates on three basic MI communication mechanisms i.e. direct MI transmission, MI waveguide transmission, and 3D coil MI communication with detailed discussion of their working mechanism, advantages and limitations. The comparative analysis of these MI techniques with each other as well as with EM wave method will facilitate the users in choosing the best method to offer enhanced transmission range (upto 250 m), reduced path loss (<100 dB), channel reliability, working bandwidth (1–2 kHz), & omni-directional coverage to realize the promising MI-based wireless underground sensor network (WUSN) applications. PeerJ Inc. 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8771792/ /pubmed/35111906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789 Text en © 2022 Malik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Computer Networks and Communications Malik, Pratap S. Abouhawwash, Mohamed Almutairi, Abdulwahab Singh, Rishi Pal Singh, Yudhvir Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title | Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title_full | Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title_short | Comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
title_sort | comparative analysis of magnetic induction based communication techniques for wireless underground sensor networks |
topic | Computer Networks and Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8771792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.789 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikprataps comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks AT abouhawwashmohamed comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks AT almutairiabdulwahab comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks AT singhrishipal comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks AT singhyudhvir comparativeanalysisofmagneticinductionbasedcommunicationtechniquesforwirelessundergroundsensornetworks |