Cargando…

Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content

BACKGROUND: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients contains cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) derived from tumour cells and it has been widely recognized as a non-invasive source of tumour DNA for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Molecular profiling of ctDNA is often perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganesamoorthy, Devika, Robertson, Alan James, Chen, Wenhan, Hall, Michael B., Cao, Minh Duc, Ferguson, Kaltin, Lakhani, Sunil R., Nones, Katia, Simpson, Peter T., Coin, Lachlan J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35057759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09160-1
_version_ 1784635767144841216
author Ganesamoorthy, Devika
Robertson, Alan James
Chen, Wenhan
Hall, Michael B.
Cao, Minh Duc
Ferguson, Kaltin
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Nones, Katia
Simpson, Peter T.
Coin, Lachlan J. M.
author_facet Ganesamoorthy, Devika
Robertson, Alan James
Chen, Wenhan
Hall, Michael B.
Cao, Minh Duc
Ferguson, Kaltin
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Nones, Katia
Simpson, Peter T.
Coin, Lachlan J. M.
author_sort Ganesamoorthy, Devika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients contains cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) derived from tumour cells and it has been widely recognized as a non-invasive source of tumour DNA for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Molecular profiling of ctDNA is often performed using targeted sequencing or low-coverage whole genome sequencing (WGS) to identify tumour specific somatic mutations or somatic copy number aberrations (sCNAs). However, these approaches cannot efficiently detect all tumour-derived genomic changes in ctDNA. METHODS: We performed WGS analysis of cfDNA from 4 breast cancer patients and 2 patients with benign tumours. We sequenced matched germline DNA for all 6 patients and tumour samples from the breast cancer patients. All samples were sequenced on Illumina HiSeqXTen sequencing platform and achieved approximately 30x, 60x and 100x coverage on germline, tumour and plasma DNA samples, respectively. RESULTS: The mutational burden of the plasma samples (1.44 somatic mutations/Mb of genome) was higher than the matched tumour samples. However, 90% of high confidence somatic cfDNA variants were not detected in matched tumour samples and were found to comprise two background plasma mutational signatures. In contrast, cfDNA from the di-nucleosome fraction (300 bp–350 bp) had much higher proportion (30%) of variants shared with tumour. Despite high coverage sequencing we were unable to detect sCNAs in plasma samples. CONCLUSIONS: Deep sequencing analysis of plasma samples revealed higher fraction of unique somatic mutations in plasma samples, which were not detected in matched tumour samples. Sequencing of di-nucleosome bound cfDNA fragments may increase recovery of tumour mutations from plasma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09160-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87720832022-01-20 Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content Ganesamoorthy, Devika Robertson, Alan James Chen, Wenhan Hall, Michael B. Cao, Minh Duc Ferguson, Kaltin Lakhani, Sunil R. Nones, Katia Simpson, Peter T. Coin, Lachlan J. M. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients contains cell-free tumour DNA (ctDNA) derived from tumour cells and it has been widely recognized as a non-invasive source of tumour DNA for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Molecular profiling of ctDNA is often performed using targeted sequencing or low-coverage whole genome sequencing (WGS) to identify tumour specific somatic mutations or somatic copy number aberrations (sCNAs). However, these approaches cannot efficiently detect all tumour-derived genomic changes in ctDNA. METHODS: We performed WGS analysis of cfDNA from 4 breast cancer patients and 2 patients with benign tumours. We sequenced matched germline DNA for all 6 patients and tumour samples from the breast cancer patients. All samples were sequenced on Illumina HiSeqXTen sequencing platform and achieved approximately 30x, 60x and 100x coverage on germline, tumour and plasma DNA samples, respectively. RESULTS: The mutational burden of the plasma samples (1.44 somatic mutations/Mb of genome) was higher than the matched tumour samples. However, 90% of high confidence somatic cfDNA variants were not detected in matched tumour samples and were found to comprise two background plasma mutational signatures. In contrast, cfDNA from the di-nucleosome fraction (300 bp–350 bp) had much higher proportion (30%) of variants shared with tumour. Despite high coverage sequencing we were unable to detect sCNAs in plasma samples. CONCLUSIONS: Deep sequencing analysis of plasma samples revealed higher fraction of unique somatic mutations in plasma samples, which were not detected in matched tumour samples. Sequencing of di-nucleosome bound cfDNA fragments may increase recovery of tumour mutations from plasma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09160-1. BioMed Central 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8772083/ /pubmed/35057759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09160-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ganesamoorthy, Devika
Robertson, Alan James
Chen, Wenhan
Hall, Michael B.
Cao, Minh Duc
Ferguson, Kaltin
Lakhani, Sunil R.
Nones, Katia
Simpson, Peter T.
Coin, Lachlan J. M.
Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title_full Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title_fullStr Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title_full_unstemmed Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title_short Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free DNA in samples with low tumour content
title_sort whole genome deep sequencing analysis of cell-free dna in samples with low tumour content
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35057759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09160-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ganesamoorthydevika wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT robertsonalanjames wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT chenwenhan wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT hallmichaelb wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT caominhduc wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT fergusonkaltin wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT lakhanisunilr wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT noneskatia wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT simpsonpetert wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent
AT coinlachlanjm wholegenomedeepsequencinganalysisofcellfreednainsampleswithlowtumourcontent