Cargando…

Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?

AIMS: To establish rates of pregnancy testing on admission of women within a blended secure service. BACKGROUND: Women with psychiatric illness are known to be at increased risk of pregnancy, often due to engagement in risky sexual behaviours such as having a higher numbers of sexual partners and en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rampling, Jeremy, Pantall, Shay-Anne, Woodman, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772093/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.902
_version_ 1784635769711755264
author Rampling, Jeremy
Pantall, Shay-Anne
Woodman, Hannah
author_facet Rampling, Jeremy
Pantall, Shay-Anne
Woodman, Hannah
author_sort Rampling, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To establish rates of pregnancy testing on admission of women within a blended secure service. BACKGROUND: Women with psychiatric illness are known to be at increased risk of pregnancy, often due to engagement in risky sexual behaviours such as having a higher numbers of sexual partners and engaging in sexual activity whilst under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Awareness of pregnancy at the point of admission to psychiatric hospital would inform ongoing care plans to manage the pregnancy in the safest, least restrictive environment and inform future prescribing decisions, to minimise the risk of teratogenicity associated with some psychotropic medications. Ardenleigh in Birmingham is a blended female secure unit. No pregnancy screening guidelines for this population currently exist. This audit sought to establish current rates of pregnancy testing at the point of admission with a view to developing future guidelines. METHOD: A retrospective case note audit of electronic records of all patients admitted to Ardenleigh blended women's service as of 1st September 2019 (n = 26). The expected standard for pregnancy testing within one month of admission was set as 100%. RESULT: The majority of patients (67%) were aged under 35 years (range 20–56). The most common ethnicities were Caucasian (42%) and African-Caribbean (38%). Almost half (46%) had a primary diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Two women were known to be pregnant at the point of admission. Only 54% of women with an unknown pregnancy status were screened for pregnancy within one month of admission. Rates of screening were particularly poor in women aged under 25 years (43%) and between 36 and 45 (0%). Women not screened for pregnancy were typically admitted from other hospital settings, including AWA services (27%) or other medium secure units (55%). 2 women admitted from prison were not tested (29%). Of those tested, the majority were checked using urine hCG (92%). None of the women tested were found to be pregnant. CONCLUSION: Overall pregnancy testing on admission to the unit was poor, with only 54% of service users screened. Less than 100% compliance could result in serious consequences for both the woman and unborn baby if a pregnancy is not discovered. Updating the admission checklist for Ardenleigh to include pregnancy testing may prove beneficial. It is recommended that a re-audit is completed 6 months following checklist introduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87720932022-01-31 Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services? Rampling, Jeremy Pantall, Shay-Anne Woodman, Hannah BJPsych Open Service Evaluation AIMS: To establish rates of pregnancy testing on admission of women within a blended secure service. BACKGROUND: Women with psychiatric illness are known to be at increased risk of pregnancy, often due to engagement in risky sexual behaviours such as having a higher numbers of sexual partners and engaging in sexual activity whilst under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Awareness of pregnancy at the point of admission to psychiatric hospital would inform ongoing care plans to manage the pregnancy in the safest, least restrictive environment and inform future prescribing decisions, to minimise the risk of teratogenicity associated with some psychotropic medications. Ardenleigh in Birmingham is a blended female secure unit. No pregnancy screening guidelines for this population currently exist. This audit sought to establish current rates of pregnancy testing at the point of admission with a view to developing future guidelines. METHOD: A retrospective case note audit of electronic records of all patients admitted to Ardenleigh blended women's service as of 1st September 2019 (n = 26). The expected standard for pregnancy testing within one month of admission was set as 100%. RESULT: The majority of patients (67%) were aged under 35 years (range 20–56). The most common ethnicities were Caucasian (42%) and African-Caribbean (38%). Almost half (46%) had a primary diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Two women were known to be pregnant at the point of admission. Only 54% of women with an unknown pregnancy status were screened for pregnancy within one month of admission. Rates of screening were particularly poor in women aged under 25 years (43%) and between 36 and 45 (0%). Women not screened for pregnancy were typically admitted from other hospital settings, including AWA services (27%) or other medium secure units (55%). 2 women admitted from prison were not tested (29%). Of those tested, the majority were checked using urine hCG (92%). None of the women tested were found to be pregnant. CONCLUSION: Overall pregnancy testing on admission to the unit was poor, with only 54% of service users screened. Less than 100% compliance could result in serious consequences for both the woman and unborn baby if a pregnancy is not discovered. Updating the admission checklist for Ardenleigh to include pregnancy testing may prove beneficial. It is recommended that a re-audit is completed 6 months following checklist introduction. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8772093/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.902 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Service Evaluation
Rampling, Jeremy
Pantall, Shay-Anne
Woodman, Hannah
Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title_full Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title_fullStr Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title_full_unstemmed Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title_short Is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
title_sort is pregnancy status being assessed within women's secure services?
topic Service Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772093/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.902
work_keys_str_mv AT ramplingjeremy ispregnancystatusbeingassessedwithinwomenssecureservices
AT pantallshayanne ispregnancystatusbeingassessedwithinwomenssecureservices
AT woodmanhannah ispregnancystatusbeingassessedwithinwomenssecureservices