Cargando…

Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The use of cortical strut allograft has not been determined for Vancouver type B1 or C fracture. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of locking compression plating with or without cortical strut allograft in managing these types of fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Hui, Guo, Xing, Wang, Yuan Hui, Zhang, Zhong Jie, Zou, Long Fei, Xue, Hao, Huang, Deng Hua, Tan, Mei Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05008-2
_version_ 1784635783194345472
author Lv, Hui
Guo, Xing
Wang, Yuan Hui
Zhang, Zhong Jie
Zou, Long Fei
Xue, Hao
Huang, Deng Hua
Tan, Mei Yun
author_facet Lv, Hui
Guo, Xing
Wang, Yuan Hui
Zhang, Zhong Jie
Zou, Long Fei
Xue, Hao
Huang, Deng Hua
Tan, Mei Yun
author_sort Lv, Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of cortical strut allograft has not been determined for Vancouver type B1 or C fracture. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of locking compression plating with or without cortical strut allograft in managing these types of fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 32 patients (17 males, 15 females; 23–88 years, mean: 67.2 years) with Vancouver type B1 or C fractures. Seventeen patients (Group A; B1 fractures in 15 hips, C fractures in 2 hips) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plates (group A). The other 15 patients (Group B; B1 in 14 hips, C in 1 hip) were fixed by locking compression plating combined with cortical strut allografting (group B). The fracture healing rate, healing time, complications and function were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 32.4 months (12 to 66), and the overall fracture union rate of the 32 patients was 96.9%. Group B had a higher fracture union rate than Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. Group A had one case of nonunion of type B1 fracture and one case of malunion; the mean time to fracture healing was 5.3 months (3 to 9). In group B, all patients reached bony union without malunion, with a mean time of fracture healing of 5.1 months (3 to 8). CONCLUSION: Treatment of Vancouver type B1 or C fractures by locking compression plating, with or without cortical strut allografting, resulted in similar union rates in these patients. This suggest that, the use of cortical strut allografting should be decided cautiously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87721532022-01-20 Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up Lv, Hui Guo, Xing Wang, Yuan Hui Zhang, Zhong Jie Zou, Long Fei Xue, Hao Huang, Deng Hua Tan, Mei Yun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The use of cortical strut allograft has not been determined for Vancouver type B1 or C fracture. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of locking compression plating with or without cortical strut allograft in managing these types of fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 32 patients (17 males, 15 females; 23–88 years, mean: 67.2 years) with Vancouver type B1 or C fractures. Seventeen patients (Group A; B1 fractures in 15 hips, C fractures in 2 hips) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plates (group A). The other 15 patients (Group B; B1 in 14 hips, C in 1 hip) were fixed by locking compression plating combined with cortical strut allografting (group B). The fracture healing rate, healing time, complications and function were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 32.4 months (12 to 66), and the overall fracture union rate of the 32 patients was 96.9%. Group B had a higher fracture union rate than Group A, but the difference was not statistically significant. Group A had one case of nonunion of type B1 fracture and one case of malunion; the mean time to fracture healing was 5.3 months (3 to 9). In group B, all patients reached bony union without malunion, with a mean time of fracture healing of 5.1 months (3 to 8). CONCLUSION: Treatment of Vancouver type B1 or C fractures by locking compression plating, with or without cortical strut allografting, resulted in similar union rates in these patients. This suggest that, the use of cortical strut allografting should be decided cautiously. BioMed Central 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8772153/ /pubmed/35045862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05008-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lv, Hui
Guo, Xing
Wang, Yuan Hui
Zhang, Zhong Jie
Zou, Long Fei
Xue, Hao
Huang, Deng Hua
Tan, Mei Yun
Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title_full Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title_fullStr Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title_short Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
title_sort open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05008-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lvhui openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT guoxing openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT wangyuanhui openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT zhangzhongjie openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT zoulongfei openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT xuehao openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT huangdenghua openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup
AT tanmeiyun openreductionandlockedcompressionplatefixationwithorwithoutallograftstrutforperiprostheticfracturesinpatientswhohadawellfixedfemoralstemaretrospectivestudywithanaverage2yearfollowup