Cargando…

A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors

AIMS: Doctors’ mental health is a national concern – the General Medical Council, British Medical Association and Health Education England pledge to improve their well-being. Well-being has no common definition, instead pathogenic measures such as burnout are published as a demonstration of doctors’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, John, Boxley, Emma, Simons, Gemma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772333/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.139
_version_ 1784635826436571136
author Jenkins, John
Boxley, Emma
Simons, Gemma
author_facet Jenkins, John
Boxley, Emma
Simons, Gemma
author_sort Jenkins, John
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Doctors’ mental health is a national concern – the General Medical Council, British Medical Association and Health Education England pledge to improve their well-being. Well-being has no common definition, instead pathogenic measures such as burnout are published as a demonstration of doctors’ wellbeing. Yet, the relationship between burnout and wel-being has not been explored. AIM: to investigate the relationship between burnout and well-being. HYPOTHESIS: they are negatively associated, but not opposites. METHOD: An online cross-sectional national survey was distributed to doctors of all grades and specialties via the Royal Colleges and doctor organisations. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) measured burnout, and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) measured well-being. Correlation coefficients between total scores of these measures estimated the relationship. Additionally, semi-structured interviews explored personal definitions of wellbeing and its relationship with burnout. Thematic analysis was carried out. RESULT: 64 doctors completed the OLBI and WEMWBS. Comparing the total scores for the questionnaires with Spearman's rho indicates a moderate negative correlation (rs= –0.658, p = 0.00, n = 64). Total scores were made into binary variables, a Chi-square test showed that a low WEMWBS score (<40) and a very high risk OLBI score (≥2.85 exhaustion and ≥2.6 disengagement) were statistically significantly associated (X 2 (1, N = 64) = 4.232, p = 0.04). Three themes emerged from the 10 interviews conducted: the importance of networks/relationships outside work; scepticism towards the proposal of an NHS wellbeing check-in; and how participants do not strive to improve their wellbeing until its decline. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates that wellbeing and burnout have only a moderate negative correlation when using commonly employed measurement tools. Therefore, measures of burnout are not a surrogate for wellbeing. Further research could adopt a salutogenic approach by using the WEMWBS to monitor doctors’ wellbeing and could explore interventions to increase well-being, rather than waiting for its decline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87723332022-01-31 A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors Jenkins, John Boxley, Emma Simons, Gemma BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations AIMS: Doctors’ mental health is a national concern – the General Medical Council, British Medical Association and Health Education England pledge to improve their well-being. Well-being has no common definition, instead pathogenic measures such as burnout are published as a demonstration of doctors’ wellbeing. Yet, the relationship between burnout and wel-being has not been explored. AIM: to investigate the relationship between burnout and well-being. HYPOTHESIS: they are negatively associated, but not opposites. METHOD: An online cross-sectional national survey was distributed to doctors of all grades and specialties via the Royal Colleges and doctor organisations. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) measured burnout, and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) measured well-being. Correlation coefficients between total scores of these measures estimated the relationship. Additionally, semi-structured interviews explored personal definitions of wellbeing and its relationship with burnout. Thematic analysis was carried out. RESULT: 64 doctors completed the OLBI and WEMWBS. Comparing the total scores for the questionnaires with Spearman's rho indicates a moderate negative correlation (rs= –0.658, p = 0.00, n = 64). Total scores were made into binary variables, a Chi-square test showed that a low WEMWBS score (<40) and a very high risk OLBI score (≥2.85 exhaustion and ≥2.6 disengagement) were statistically significantly associated (X 2 (1, N = 64) = 4.232, p = 0.04). Three themes emerged from the 10 interviews conducted: the importance of networks/relationships outside work; scepticism towards the proposal of an NHS wellbeing check-in; and how participants do not strive to improve their wellbeing until its decline. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates that wellbeing and burnout have only a moderate negative correlation when using commonly employed measurement tools. Therefore, measures of burnout are not a surrogate for wellbeing. Further research could adopt a salutogenic approach by using the WEMWBS to monitor doctors’ wellbeing and could explore interventions to increase well-being, rather than waiting for its decline. Cambridge University Press 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8772333/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.139 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
Jenkins, John
Boxley, Emma
Simons, Gemma
A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title_full A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title_fullStr A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title_full_unstemmed A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title_short A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
title_sort national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
topic Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772333/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.139
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinsjohn anationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors
AT boxleyemma anationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors
AT simonsgemma anationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors
AT jenkinsjohn nationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors
AT boxleyemma nationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors
AT simonsgemma nationalcrosssectionalsurveyandinterviewsexploringtherelationshipbetweenwellbeingandburnoutindoctors