Cargando…

IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

OBJECTIVE: There is an evidence–practice gap in assessment of the upper extremities during acute and subacute stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to target this gap by describing and evaluating the implementation of, and adherence to, an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ALT MURPHY, Margit, BJÖRKDAHL, Ann, FORSBERG-WÄRLEBY, Gunilla, PERSSON, Carina U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2790
_version_ 1784635831140483072
author ALT MURPHY, Margit
BJÖRKDAHL, Ann
FORSBERG-WÄRLEBY, Gunilla
PERSSON, Carina U.
author_facet ALT MURPHY, Margit
BJÖRKDAHL, Ann
FORSBERG-WÄRLEBY, Gunilla
PERSSON, Carina U.
author_sort ALT MURPHY, Margit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is an evidence–practice gap in assessment of the upper extremities during acute and subacute stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to target this gap by describing and evaluating the implementation of, and adherence to, an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for occupational therapists and physiotherapists. METHODS: The upper extremity assessment implementation process at Sahlgrenska University Hospital comprised 5 stages: mapping clinical practice, identifying evidence-based outcome measures, development of a guideline, implementation, and evaluation. A systematic theoretical framework was used to guide and facilitate the implementation process. A survey, answered by 44 clinicians (23 physiotherapists and 21 occupational therapists), was used for evaluation. RESULTS: The guideline includes 6 primary standardized assessments (Shoulder Abduction, Finger Extension (SAFE), 2 items of the Actions Research Arm Test (ARAT-2), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and grip strength (Jamar hand dynamometer)) performed at specified time-points post-stroke. More than 80% (35 to 42) clinicians reported reported being content with the guideline and the implementation process. Approximately 60–90% of the clinicians reported good adherence to specific assessments, and approximately 50% reported good adherence to the agreed time-points. Comprehensive scales were more difficult to implement compared with the shorter screening scales. High levels of work rotation among staff, and the need to prioritize other assessments during the first week after stroke, hindered to implementation. CONCLUSION: The robustness of evidence, adequate support and receptive context facilitated the implementation process. The guideline enables a more structured, knowledge-based and consistent assessment, and thereby supports clinical decision-making and patient involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87723592022-02-08 IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE ALT MURPHY, Margit BJÖRKDAHL, Ann FORSBERG-WÄRLEBY, Gunilla PERSSON, Carina U. J Rehabil Med Original Report OBJECTIVE: There is an evidence–practice gap in assessment of the upper extremities during acute and subacute stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to target this gap by describing and evaluating the implementation of, and adherence to, an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for occupational therapists and physiotherapists. METHODS: The upper extremity assessment implementation process at Sahlgrenska University Hospital comprised 5 stages: mapping clinical practice, identifying evidence-based outcome measures, development of a guideline, implementation, and evaluation. A systematic theoretical framework was used to guide and facilitate the implementation process. A survey, answered by 44 clinicians (23 physiotherapists and 21 occupational therapists), was used for evaluation. RESULTS: The guideline includes 6 primary standardized assessments (Shoulder Abduction, Finger Extension (SAFE), 2 items of the Actions Research Arm Test (ARAT-2), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and grip strength (Jamar hand dynamometer)) performed at specified time-points post-stroke. More than 80% (35 to 42) clinicians reported reported being content with the guideline and the implementation process. Approximately 60–90% of the clinicians reported good adherence to specific assessments, and approximately 50% reported good adherence to the agreed time-points. Comprehensive scales were more difficult to implement compared with the shorter screening scales. High levels of work rotation among staff, and the need to prioritize other assessments during the first week after stroke, hindered to implementation. CONCLUSION: The robustness of evidence, adequate support and receptive context facilitated the implementation process. The guideline enables a more structured, knowledge-based and consistent assessment, and thereby supports clinical decision-making and patient involvement. Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8772359/ /pubmed/33470413 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2790 Text en © 2021 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Report
ALT MURPHY, Margit
BJÖRKDAHL, Ann
FORSBERG-WÄRLEBY, Gunilla
PERSSON, Carina U.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_full IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_fullStr IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_full_unstemmed IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_short IMPLEMENTATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION: FROM EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_sort implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: from evidence to clinical practice
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2790
work_keys_str_mv AT altmurphymargit implementationofevidencebasedassessmentofupperextremityinstrokerehabilitationfromevidencetoclinicalpractice
AT bjorkdahlann implementationofevidencebasedassessmentofupperextremityinstrokerehabilitationfromevidencetoclinicalpractice
AT forsbergwarlebygunilla implementationofevidencebasedassessmentofupperextremityinstrokerehabilitationfromevidencetoclinicalpractice
AT perssoncarinau implementationofevidencebasedassessmentofupperextremityinstrokerehabilitationfromevidencetoclinicalpractice