Cargando…
ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF UPPER-LIMB SPASTICITY MANAGEMENT USING A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO GOAL-SETTING AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: FIRST CYCLE RESULTS FROM THE ULIS-III STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To describe the utility of a structured approach to assessing effectiveness following injection with botulinum toxin-A alongside physical therapies, within the first cycle of the Upper Limb International Spasticity-III (ULIS-III) study. METHODS: ULIS-III (registered at clinicaltrials.gov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2770 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To describe the utility of a structured approach to assessing effectiveness following injection with botulinum toxin-A alongside physical therapies, within the first cycle of the Upper Limb International Spasticity-III (ULIS-III) study. METHODS: ULIS-III (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02454803) is a large international, observational, longitudinal study of adults treated for upper-limb spasticity. It introduces novel methods for the structured evaluation of person-centred goal attainment alongside targeted standardized outcome measures: the Upper limb Spasticity Index, and the Upper Limb Spasticity Therapy Recording Schedule. RESULTS: A total of 953/1,004 enrolled patients (95%) completed cycle 1. Mean overall goal attainment scaling (GAS) T scores were 49.8 (95% confidence interval 49.2–50.3; 67.1% of patients met their primary goal, with highest achievement rates for goals related to involuntary movement, (75.6%) and range of movement (74.4%). Standardized measures of spasticity, pain, involuntary movements, active and passive function, all improved significantly over the treatment cycle. Overall, 59.7% of patients saw a therapist following botulinum toxin-A injection. Interventions varied, as expected, with the set treatment goals. After controlling for concomitant therapies using the upper limb spasticity therapy recording schedule, significant differences in injection intervals (p < 0.001) were seen between the commercially-available botulinum toxin-A agents. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm the utility of the Upper Limb Spasticity Index and Upper Limb Spasticity Therapy Recording Schedule as a structured approach to capturing goal-setting, therapy inputs and outcomes assessment. |
---|