Cargando…

Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION: Safe anaesthesia care is a fundamental part of healthcare. In a previous study, registered nurse anaesthetists (RNAs) had the highest task frequency, with the largest amount of multitasking and interruptions among all professionals working in a surgical team. There is a lack of knowled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olin, Karolina, Göras, Camilla, Nilsson, Ulrica, Unbeck, Maria, Ehrenberg, Anna, Pukk-Härenstam, Karin, Ekstedt, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052283
_version_ 1784635842247000064
author Olin, Karolina
Göras, Camilla
Nilsson, Ulrica
Unbeck, Maria
Ehrenberg, Anna
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Ekstedt, Mirjam
author_facet Olin, Karolina
Göras, Camilla
Nilsson, Ulrica
Unbeck, Maria
Ehrenberg, Anna
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Ekstedt, Mirjam
author_sort Olin, Karolina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Safe anaesthesia care is a fundamental part of healthcare. In a previous study, registered nurse anaesthetists (RNAs) had the highest task frequency, with the largest amount of multitasking and interruptions among all professionals working in a surgical team. There is a lack of knowledge on how these factors are distributed during the intraoperative anaesthesia care process, and what implications they might have on safety and quality of care. OBJECTIVE: To map the RNAs’ work as done in practice, including tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions, during all phases of the intraoperative anaesthesia work process. METHODS: Structured observations of RNAs (n=8) conducted during 30 procedures lasting a total of 73 hours in an operating department at a county hospital in Sweden, using the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing tool. RESULTS: High task intensity and multitasking were revealed during preparation for anaesthesia induction (79 tasks/hour, 61.9% of task time spent multitasking), anaesthesia induction (98 tasks/hour, 50.7%) and preparation for anaesthesia maintenance (86 tasks/hour, 80.2%). Frequent interruptions took place during preoperative preparation (4.7 /hour), anaesthesia induction (6.2 /hour) and preparation for anaesthesia maintenance (4.3 /hour). The interruptions were most often related to medication care (n=54, 19.8%), equipment issues (n=40, 14.7%) or the procedure itself (n=39, 14.3%). RNAs’ work was conducted mostly independently (58.4%), but RNAs interacted with multiple professionals in and outside the operating room during anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: The tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions during different phases illustrated the RNAs’ work as done, as part of a complex adaptive system. Management of safety in the most intense phases—preparing for anaesthesia induction, induction and preparing for anaesthesia maintenance—should be investigated further. The complexity and adaptivity of the nature of RNAs’ work should be taken into consideration in future management, development, research and education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87724152022-02-04 Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study Olin, Karolina Göras, Camilla Nilsson, Ulrica Unbeck, Maria Ehrenberg, Anna Pukk-Härenstam, Karin Ekstedt, Mirjam BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Safe anaesthesia care is a fundamental part of healthcare. In a previous study, registered nurse anaesthetists (RNAs) had the highest task frequency, with the largest amount of multitasking and interruptions among all professionals working in a surgical team. There is a lack of knowledge on how these factors are distributed during the intraoperative anaesthesia care process, and what implications they might have on safety and quality of care. OBJECTIVE: To map the RNAs’ work as done in practice, including tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions, during all phases of the intraoperative anaesthesia work process. METHODS: Structured observations of RNAs (n=8) conducted during 30 procedures lasting a total of 73 hours in an operating department at a county hospital in Sweden, using the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing tool. RESULTS: High task intensity and multitasking were revealed during preparation for anaesthesia induction (79 tasks/hour, 61.9% of task time spent multitasking), anaesthesia induction (98 tasks/hour, 50.7%) and preparation for anaesthesia maintenance (86 tasks/hour, 80.2%). Frequent interruptions took place during preoperative preparation (4.7 /hour), anaesthesia induction (6.2 /hour) and preparation for anaesthesia maintenance (4.3 /hour). The interruptions were most often related to medication care (n=54, 19.8%), equipment issues (n=40, 14.7%) or the procedure itself (n=39, 14.3%). RNAs’ work was conducted mostly independently (58.4%), but RNAs interacted with multiple professionals in and outside the operating room during anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: The tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions during different phases illustrated the RNAs’ work as done, as part of a complex adaptive system. Management of safety in the most intense phases—preparing for anaesthesia induction, induction and preparing for anaesthesia maintenance—should be investigated further. The complexity and adaptivity of the nature of RNAs’ work should be taken into consideration in future management, development, research and education. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8772415/ /pubmed/35045998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Olin, Karolina
Göras, Camilla
Nilsson, Ulrica
Unbeck, Maria
Ehrenberg, Anna
Pukk-Härenstam, Karin
Ekstedt, Mirjam
Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title_full Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title_short Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
title_sort mapping registered nurse anaesthetists’ intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052283
work_keys_str_mv AT olinkarolina mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gorascamilla mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nilssonulrica mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT unbeckmaria mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ehrenberganna mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pukkharenstamkarin mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ekstedtmirjam mappingregisterednurseanaesthetistsintraoperativeworktasksmultitaskinginterruptionsandtheircausesandinteractionsaprospectiveobservationalstudy