Cargando…
Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I)
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ultrasound or sonography is an image which can provide valuable information for diagnosing and treating a variety of diseases and conditions. This experiment was done to check the performance and evaluate the ultrasonic imaging system. There were three tests performed in this...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_166_20 |
_version_ | 1784635854110588928 |
---|---|
author | Oglat, Ammar A. Dheyab, Mohammed Ali |
author_facet | Oglat, Ammar A. Dheyab, Mohammed Ali |
author_sort | Oglat, Ammar A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ultrasound or sonography is an image which can provide valuable information for diagnosing and treating a variety of diseases and conditions. This experiment was done to check the performance and evaluate the ultrasonic imaging system. There were three tests performed in this experiment: dead zone (transducer ring-down), vertical measurement calibration, and horizontal measurement calibration. METHODS: The evaluation was made by performed all the tests with different depth on two different multipurpose phantom model #539. The tests were also performed by two different probes which were curved and flat (linear probe). The images were taken, and the measurements were made by electronic calipers on the ultrasound machine system. Observations and evaluations were done via all images and measurements taken. RESULTS: The images formed by two various probes were different. The penetration settings were different since the depths were different. The depth influenced the penetrations to the formed image. From the comparison of all results and measurements recorded were all under the accepted value of the standard that was given by the manufacture of the phantom. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it can be concluded that the measurements were all not exceeding 2% of the standard value given based on the result that we get. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8772471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87724712022-02-03 Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) Oglat, Ammar A. Dheyab, Mohammed Ali J Med Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ultrasound or sonography is an image which can provide valuable information for diagnosing and treating a variety of diseases and conditions. This experiment was done to check the performance and evaluate the ultrasonic imaging system. There were three tests performed in this experiment: dead zone (transducer ring-down), vertical measurement calibration, and horizontal measurement calibration. METHODS: The evaluation was made by performed all the tests with different depth on two different multipurpose phantom model #539. The tests were also performed by two different probes which were curved and flat (linear probe). The images were taken, and the measurements were made by electronic calipers on the ultrasound machine system. Observations and evaluations were done via all images and measurements taken. RESULTS: The images formed by two various probes were different. The penetration settings were different since the depths were different. The depth influenced the penetrations to the formed image. From the comparison of all results and measurements recorded were all under the accepted value of the standard that was given by the manufacture of the phantom. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it can be concluded that the measurements were all not exceeding 2% of the standard value given based on the result that we get. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8772471/ /pubmed/35127405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_166_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Medical Ultrasound https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oglat, Ammar A. Dheyab, Mohammed Ali Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title | Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title_full | Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title_fullStr | Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title_short | Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Imaging System (Part I) |
title_sort | performance evaluation of ultrasonic imaging system (part i) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_166_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oglatammara performanceevaluationofultrasonicimagingsystemparti AT dheyabmohammedali performanceevaluationofultrasonicimagingsystemparti |