Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study

Ischial tuberosity cyst is a common disease, and the conventional incision procedure is associated with several disadvantages, leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for ischial tuberosity cyst and compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Ying-chun, Mi, Yun-feng, Jiang, Bo, Dong, Qirong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028128
_version_ 1784635894686285824
author Zhu, Ying-chun
Mi, Yun-feng
Jiang, Bo
Dong, Qirong
author_facet Zhu, Ying-chun
Mi, Yun-feng
Jiang, Bo
Dong, Qirong
author_sort Zhu, Ying-chun
collection PubMed
description Ischial tuberosity cyst is a common disease, and the conventional incision procedure is associated with several disadvantages, leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for ischial tuberosity cyst and compared it with conventional incision surgery. The clinical data of 57 patients with ischial tuberosity cyst from May 2016 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 49 patients were included. Of these patients, 24 patients received arthroscopic procedure (N = 24) and 25 patients received conventional incision procedure (N = 25). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Visual analogue scale scores was used to evaluate pain at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery. All 49 patients were followed up for (11.3 ± 3.3) months. All patients in the arthroscopy group achieved phase I healing while 3 patients in conventional incision group developed complications. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay in the arthroscopy group were (54.7 ± 7.7) minutes, (20.8 ± 3.5) mL, (20.3 ± 5.6) mL, and (2.8 ± 0.6) days, and were significantly better than those of (71.8 ± 8.8) minutes, (67.3 ± 12.0) mL, (103.6 ± 20.3) mL, and (7.8 ± 2.9) days in the conventional incision group, respectively. In the arthroscopy group, the visual analogue scale scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery [(2.6 ± 0.7), (0.5 ± 0.6), (0.3 ± 0.5) points] were significantly lower than those in the conventional incision group [(6.0 ± 0.7), (3.0 ± 1.0), and (1.1 ± 1.0) points], and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Finally, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the treatment of ischial tuberosity cysts, arthroscopy has advantages of minimal invasion, less blood loss during perioperative period, milder postoperative pain, and rapid recovery when compared with conventional incision surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87726622022-01-21 Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study Zhu, Ying-chun Mi, Yun-feng Jiang, Bo Dong, Qirong Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Ischial tuberosity cyst is a common disease, and the conventional incision procedure is associated with several disadvantages, leading to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for ischial tuberosity cyst and compared it with conventional incision surgery. The clinical data of 57 patients with ischial tuberosity cyst from May 2016 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 49 patients were included. Of these patients, 24 patients received arthroscopic procedure (N = 24) and 25 patients received conventional incision procedure (N = 25). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Visual analogue scale scores was used to evaluate pain at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery. All 49 patients were followed up for (11.3 ± 3.3) months. All patients in the arthroscopy group achieved phase I healing while 3 patients in conventional incision group developed complications. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay in the arthroscopy group were (54.7 ± 7.7) minutes, (20.8 ± 3.5) mL, (20.3 ± 5.6) mL, and (2.8 ± 0.6) days, and were significantly better than those of (71.8 ± 8.8) minutes, (67.3 ± 12.0) mL, (103.6 ± 20.3) mL, and (7.8 ± 2.9) days in the conventional incision group, respectively. In the arthroscopy group, the visual analogue scale scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the surgery [(2.6 ± 0.7), (0.5 ± 0.6), (0.3 ± 0.5) points] were significantly lower than those in the conventional incision group [(6.0 ± 0.7), (3.0 ± 1.0), and (1.1 ± 1.0) points], and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Finally, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the treatment of ischial tuberosity cysts, arthroscopy has advantages of minimal invasion, less blood loss during perioperative period, milder postoperative pain, and rapid recovery when compared with conventional incision surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8772662/ /pubmed/35060495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028128 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Zhu, Ying-chun
Mi, Yun-feng
Jiang, Bo
Dong, Qirong
Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title_full Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title_short Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: A retrospective comparison study
title_sort clinical efficacy of arthroscopic treatment in ischial tuberosity cyst: a retrospective comparison study
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35060495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028128
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyingchun clinicalefficacyofarthroscopictreatmentinischialtuberositycystaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT miyunfeng clinicalefficacyofarthroscopictreatmentinischialtuberositycystaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT jiangbo clinicalefficacyofarthroscopictreatmentinischialtuberositycystaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT dongqirong clinicalefficacyofarthroscopictreatmentinischialtuberositycystaretrospectivecomparisonstudy