Cargando…
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective
PURPOSE: This study sought the views of women with impaired fertility on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their fertility treatment and psychological wellbeing. METHODS: A cross-sectional, anonymous, online questionnaire was completed in June–December 2020 by 249 women attending fertility clin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06379-y |
_version_ | 1784636076065816576 |
---|---|
author | Wedner-Ross, Shona Schippert, Cordula von Versen-Höynck, Frauke |
author_facet | Wedner-Ross, Shona Schippert, Cordula von Versen-Höynck, Frauke |
author_sort | Wedner-Ross, Shona |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study sought the views of women with impaired fertility on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their fertility treatment and psychological wellbeing. METHODS: A cross-sectional, anonymous, online questionnaire was completed in June–December 2020 by 249 women attending fertility clinics across Germany. All women seeking treatment in fertility clinics were eligible to participate. The online survey covered questions about the patient’s quality of life, their opinions about the professional societies’ recommendations and their effects as well as any concerns about infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Three-quarters of participants disagreed with the pausing of fertility treatments. Women who participated from October to December 2020, when the incidence rate was high, were as likely to disagree as participants that participated from June to September 2020 (73% vs 79%, p = 0.3). Seventy-two participants (29%) had their appointments cancelled. Nearly all (97%) reported being upset by this, with 40 (56%) reporting that they were extremely or very disappointed about the cancellation. Women who had to wait 10 weeks or longer were more likely to be upset by the postponement or cancellation of their appointment than women who had to wait a shorter amount of time (p = 0.01). Many participants (41%) were worried about possible negative effects a SARS-CoV-2 infection might have related to their fertility, pregnancy or unborn child. CONCLUSION: Postponement of treatments increased distress among patients and should be avoided when possible. Fertility clinics must provide information about the current state of knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancies and options for immunization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-021-06379-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8773402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87734022022-01-21 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective Wedner-Ross, Shona Schippert, Cordula von Versen-Höynck, Frauke Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine PURPOSE: This study sought the views of women with impaired fertility on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their fertility treatment and psychological wellbeing. METHODS: A cross-sectional, anonymous, online questionnaire was completed in June–December 2020 by 249 women attending fertility clinics across Germany. All women seeking treatment in fertility clinics were eligible to participate. The online survey covered questions about the patient’s quality of life, their opinions about the professional societies’ recommendations and their effects as well as any concerns about infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Three-quarters of participants disagreed with the pausing of fertility treatments. Women who participated from October to December 2020, when the incidence rate was high, were as likely to disagree as participants that participated from June to September 2020 (73% vs 79%, p = 0.3). Seventy-two participants (29%) had their appointments cancelled. Nearly all (97%) reported being upset by this, with 40 (56%) reporting that they were extremely or very disappointed about the cancellation. Women who had to wait 10 weeks or longer were more likely to be upset by the postponement or cancellation of their appointment than women who had to wait a shorter amount of time (p = 0.01). Many participants (41%) were worried about possible negative effects a SARS-CoV-2 infection might have related to their fertility, pregnancy or unborn child. CONCLUSION: Postponement of treatments increased distress among patients and should be avoided when possible. Fertility clinics must provide information about the current state of knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancies and options for immunization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-021-06379-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8773402/ /pubmed/35059794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06379-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine Wedner-Ross, Shona Schippert, Cordula von Versen-Höynck, Frauke The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title | The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title_full | The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title_fullStr | The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title_short | The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
title_sort | impact of the covid-19 pandemic on women seeking fertility treatment: the patient’s perspective |
topic | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35059794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06379-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wednerrossshona theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective AT schippertcordula theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective AT vonversenhoynckfrauke theimpactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective AT wednerrossshona impactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective AT schippertcordula impactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective AT vonversenhoynckfrauke impactofthecovid19pandemiconwomenseekingfertilitytreatmentthepatientsperspective |