Cargando…

Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach

Robot-assisted rehabilitation (RAR) and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are interventions that, both individually and combined, can significantly enhance motor performance after spinal cord injury (SCI). We sought to determine whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naro, Antonino, Billeri, Luana, Balletta, Tina, Lauria, Paola, Onesta, Maria Pia, Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010119
_version_ 1784636160311558144
author Naro, Antonino
Billeri, Luana
Balletta, Tina
Lauria, Paola
Onesta, Maria Pia
Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
author_facet Naro, Antonino
Billeri, Luana
Balletta, Tina
Lauria, Paola
Onesta, Maria Pia
Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
author_sort Naro, Antonino
collection PubMed
description Robot-assisted rehabilitation (RAR) and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are interventions that, both individually and combined, can significantly enhance motor performance after spinal cord injury (SCI). We sought to determine whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with active transvertebral direct current stimulation (tvDCS) (namely, NIBS) in association with RAR (RAR + NIBS) improves lower extremity motor function more than RAR alone in subjects with motor incomplete SCI (iSCI). Fifteen adults with iSCI received one daily session of RAR+NIBS in the early afternoon, six sessions weekly, for eight consecutive weeks. Outcome measures included the 6 min walk test (6MWT), the 10 m walk test (10MWT), the timed up and go (TUG) to test mobility and balance, the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), the Functional Independence Measure-Locomotion (FIM-L), the manual muscle testing for lower extremity motor score (LEMS), the modified Ashworth scale for lower limbs (MAS), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The data of these subjects were compared with those of 20 individuals matched for clinical and demographic features who previously received the same amount or RAR without NIBS (RAR − NIBS). All patients completed the trial, and none reported any side effects either during or following the training. The 10MWT improved in both groups, but the increase was significantly greater following RAR + NIBS than RAR − NIBS. The same occurred for the FIM-L, LEMS, and WISCI II. No significant differences were appreciable concerning the 6MWT and TUG. Conversely, RAR − NIBS outperformed RAR + NIBS regarding the MAS and VAS. Pairing tvDCS with rTMS during RAR can improve lower extremity motor function more than RAR alone can do. Future research with a larger sample size is recommended to determine longer-term effects on motor function and activities of daily living.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8773706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87737062022-01-21 Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach Naro, Antonino Billeri, Luana Balletta, Tina Lauria, Paola Onesta, Maria Pia Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore Brain Sci Article Robot-assisted rehabilitation (RAR) and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are interventions that, both individually and combined, can significantly enhance motor performance after spinal cord injury (SCI). We sought to determine whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with active transvertebral direct current stimulation (tvDCS) (namely, NIBS) in association with RAR (RAR + NIBS) improves lower extremity motor function more than RAR alone in subjects with motor incomplete SCI (iSCI). Fifteen adults with iSCI received one daily session of RAR+NIBS in the early afternoon, six sessions weekly, for eight consecutive weeks. Outcome measures included the 6 min walk test (6MWT), the 10 m walk test (10MWT), the timed up and go (TUG) to test mobility and balance, the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), the Functional Independence Measure-Locomotion (FIM-L), the manual muscle testing for lower extremity motor score (LEMS), the modified Ashworth scale for lower limbs (MAS), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The data of these subjects were compared with those of 20 individuals matched for clinical and demographic features who previously received the same amount or RAR without NIBS (RAR − NIBS). All patients completed the trial, and none reported any side effects either during or following the training. The 10MWT improved in both groups, but the increase was significantly greater following RAR + NIBS than RAR − NIBS. The same occurred for the FIM-L, LEMS, and WISCI II. No significant differences were appreciable concerning the 6MWT and TUG. Conversely, RAR − NIBS outperformed RAR + NIBS regarding the MAS and VAS. Pairing tvDCS with rTMS during RAR can improve lower extremity motor function more than RAR alone can do. Future research with a larger sample size is recommended to determine longer-term effects on motor function and activities of daily living. MDPI 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8773706/ /pubmed/35053862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010119 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naro, Antonino
Billeri, Luana
Balletta, Tina
Lauria, Paola
Onesta, Maria Pia
Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title_full Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title_fullStr Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title_short Finding the Way to Improve Motor Recovery of Patients with Spinal Cord Lesions: A Case-Control Pilot Study on a Novel Neuromodulation Approach
title_sort finding the way to improve motor recovery of patients with spinal cord lesions: a case-control pilot study on a novel neuromodulation approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010119
work_keys_str_mv AT naroantonino findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach
AT billeriluana findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach
AT ballettatina findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach
AT lauriapaola findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach
AT onestamariapia findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach
AT calabroroccosalvatore findingthewaytoimprovemotorrecoveryofpatientswithspinalcordlesionsacasecontrolpilotstudyonanovelneuromodulationapproach