Cargando…
Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5)
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European (EASL) and American (AASLD) guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggest different management of nodules with indeterminate imaging in cirrhosis. In particular, nodules classified as LR-3 and LR-4 by the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (indeterminate fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14020336 |
_version_ | 1784636168714846208 |
---|---|
author | Terzi, Eleonora Giamperoli, Alice Iavarone, Massimo Leoni, Simona De Bonis, Ludovico Granito, Alessandro Forgione, Antonella Tovoli, Francesco Piscaglia, Fabio |
author_facet | Terzi, Eleonora Giamperoli, Alice Iavarone, Massimo Leoni, Simona De Bonis, Ludovico Granito, Alessandro Forgione, Antonella Tovoli, Francesco Piscaglia, Fabio |
author_sort | Terzi, Eleonora |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European (EASL) and American (AASLD) guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggest different management of nodules with indeterminate imaging in cirrhosis. In particular, nodules classified as LR-3 and LR-4 by the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (indeterminate for HCC) are suggested to be biopsied according the EASL guidelines, but may be only monitored with follow-up imaging, with biopsy left to selected LR-4/LR-M cases, according to the AASLD ones. The present study shows that CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 HCC have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC (LR-5). Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated. ABSTRACT: The American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme, which categorizes hepatic nodules in risk classes from LR-1 to LR-5 (according to the degree of risk to be HCC) and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). The aim of this study was to test whether HCC with different LR patterns on CEUS have different overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We retrospectively enrolled 167 patients with the first definitive diagnosis of single HCC (by using CT/MRI or histological techniques if CT/MRI were inconclusive) for whom CEUS examination was available. The median size of HCC lesions was 2.2 cm (range 1.0–7.2 cm). According to CEUS LI-RADS classification, 28 patients were in LR-3, 48 in LR-4, 83 in LR-5, and 8 in LR-M. Patient liver function and nodule characteristics were not statistically different between CEUS LI-RADS classes. Using univariate analysis, CEUS LI-RADS class was not found to be a predictor of survival (p = 0.347). In conclusion, HCC showing the CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC. Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8773738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87737382022-01-21 Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) Terzi, Eleonora Giamperoli, Alice Iavarone, Massimo Leoni, Simona De Bonis, Ludovico Granito, Alessandro Forgione, Antonella Tovoli, Francesco Piscaglia, Fabio Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The European (EASL) and American (AASLD) guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggest different management of nodules with indeterminate imaging in cirrhosis. In particular, nodules classified as LR-3 and LR-4 by the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (indeterminate for HCC) are suggested to be biopsied according the EASL guidelines, but may be only monitored with follow-up imaging, with biopsy left to selected LR-4/LR-M cases, according to the AASLD ones. The present study shows that CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 HCC have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC (LR-5). Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated. ABSTRACT: The American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) scheme, which categorizes hepatic nodules in risk classes from LR-1 to LR-5 (according to the degree of risk to be HCC) and LR-M (probable malignancy not specific for HCC). The aim of this study was to test whether HCC with different LR patterns on CEUS have different overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We retrospectively enrolled 167 patients with the first definitive diagnosis of single HCC (by using CT/MRI or histological techniques if CT/MRI were inconclusive) for whom CEUS examination was available. The median size of HCC lesions was 2.2 cm (range 1.0–7.2 cm). According to CEUS LI-RADS classification, 28 patients were in LR-3, 48 in LR-4, 83 in LR-5, and 8 in LR-M. Patient liver function and nodule characteristics were not statistically different between CEUS LI-RADS classes. Using univariate analysis, CEUS LI-RADS class was not found to be a predictor of survival (p = 0.347). In conclusion, HCC showing the CEUS LI-RADS classes LR-3 and LR-4 have no better clinical outcome than typical HCC. Such data support the EASL policy, aimed at conclusive diagnostic investigations of indeterminate nodules up to obtaining histological proof to avoid leaving aggressive HCC not timely treated. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8773738/ /pubmed/35053498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14020336 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Terzi, Eleonora Giamperoli, Alice Iavarone, Massimo Leoni, Simona De Bonis, Ludovico Granito, Alessandro Forgione, Antonella Tovoli, Francesco Piscaglia, Fabio Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title | Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title_full | Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title_fullStr | Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title_short | Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5) |
title_sort | prognosis of single early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) with ceus inconclusive imaging (li-rads lr-3 and lr-4) is no better than typical hcc (lr-5) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8773738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14020336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terzieleonora prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT giamperolialice prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT iavaronemassimo prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT leonisimona prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT debonisludovico prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT granitoalessandro prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT forgioneantonella prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT tovolifrancesco prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 AT piscagliafabio prognosisofsingleearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomahccwithceusinconclusiveimagingliradslr3andlr4isnobetterthantypicalhcclr5 |