Cargando…

Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation

Bilateral motor training is a useful method for modifying corticospinal excitability. The effects of bilateral movement that are caused by artificial stimulation on corticospinal excitability have not been reported. We compared motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the primary motor cortex (M1) after co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani, Suzuki, Shinya, Yoshida, Susumu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010061
_version_ 1784636289889337344
author Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani
Suzuki, Shinya
Yoshida, Susumu
author_facet Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani
Suzuki, Shinya
Yoshida, Susumu
author_sort Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani
collection PubMed
description Bilateral motor training is a useful method for modifying corticospinal excitability. The effects of bilateral movement that are caused by artificial stimulation on corticospinal excitability have not been reported. We compared motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the primary motor cortex (M1) after conventional bilateral motor training and artificial bilateral movements generated by electromyogram activity of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle-triggered peripheral nerve stimulation (c-MNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the ipsilateral M1 (i-TMS). A total of three protocols with different interventions—bilateral finger training, APB-triggered c-MNS, and APB-triggered i-TMS—were administered to 12 healthy participants. Each protocol consisted of 360 trials of 30 min for each trial. MEPs that were induced by single-pulse TMS, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) that were induced by paired-pulse TMS were assessed as outcome measures at baseline and at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min after intervention. MEP amplitude significantly increased up to 40 min post-intervention in all protocols compared to that at the baseline, although there were some differences in the changing pattern of ICF and SICI in each protocol. These findings suggest that artificial bilateral movement has the potential to increase the ipsilateral cortical excitability of the moving finger.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8774239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87742392022-01-21 Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani Suzuki, Shinya Yoshida, Susumu Brain Sci Article Bilateral motor training is a useful method for modifying corticospinal excitability. The effects of bilateral movement that are caused by artificial stimulation on corticospinal excitability have not been reported. We compared motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the primary motor cortex (M1) after conventional bilateral motor training and artificial bilateral movements generated by electromyogram activity of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle-triggered peripheral nerve stimulation (c-MNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the ipsilateral M1 (i-TMS). A total of three protocols with different interventions—bilateral finger training, APB-triggered c-MNS, and APB-triggered i-TMS—were administered to 12 healthy participants. Each protocol consisted of 360 trials of 30 min for each trial. MEPs that were induced by single-pulse TMS, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) that were induced by paired-pulse TMS were assessed as outcome measures at baseline and at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min after intervention. MEP amplitude significantly increased up to 40 min post-intervention in all protocols compared to that at the baseline, although there were some differences in the changing pattern of ICF and SICI in each protocol. These findings suggest that artificial bilateral movement has the potential to increase the ipsilateral cortical excitability of the moving finger. MDPI 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8774239/ /pubmed/35053805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010061 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kariyawasam, Pramudika Nirmani
Suzuki, Shinya
Yoshida, Susumu
Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title_full Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title_fullStr Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title_short Motor Cortical Plasticity Induced by Volitional Muscle Activity-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Median Nerve Stimulation
title_sort motor cortical plasticity induced by volitional muscle activity-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation and median nerve stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010061
work_keys_str_mv AT kariyawasampramudikanirmani motorcorticalplasticityinducedbyvolitionalmuscleactivitytriggeredtranscranialmagneticstimulationandmediannervestimulation
AT suzukishinya motorcorticalplasticityinducedbyvolitionalmuscleactivitytriggeredtranscranialmagneticstimulationandmediannervestimulation
AT yoshidasusumu motorcorticalplasticityinducedbyvolitionalmuscleactivitytriggeredtranscranialmagneticstimulationandmediannervestimulation